Theoretical and numerical analysis of acoustic emission guided waves released during crack propagation
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents a theoretical and numerical analysis of guided wave released during an acoustic emission event using excitation potentials. Theoretical formulation showed that guided wave generated using excitation potentials follows the Rayleigh–Lamb equation. The numerical studies predict the out-of-plane displacement of acoustic emission guided wave on the plate surface at some distance away from the source. Parameter studies were performed to evaluate the effect of (1) pressure and shear potentials acting alone and in combination, (2) plate thickness, (3) source depth, (4) rise time, and (5) propagating distance away from the source. Numerical results showed that peak amplitude of S0 signal increases with increasing plate thickness, whereas the peak amplitude of A0 signal initially decreases and then increases with increasing plate thickness. Regarding the source depth, it was found that peak amplitude of S0 signal decreases and A0 signal increases with increasing source depth. Peak time showed a notable contribution to the low-frequency component of A0 signal. There were large losses in S0 and A0 peak signal amplitude over the propagation distance from 100 to 500 mm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Achenbach JD · 2003
2. Aki K · 2002
3. 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00071-310.1016/S0022-460X(03)00071-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/0013-7944(94)90221-610.1016/0013-7944(94)90221-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.12.02110.1016/j.jsv.2014.12.021 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-0-387-68188-710.1007/978-0-387-68188-7 ↗
7. Giurgiutiu V · 2014
8. Graff KF · 1975
9. 10.1115/1.403811610.1115/1.4038116 ↗
10. Haider MF, Giurgiutiu V (2017b) Full derivation of the Helmholtz potential approach to the analysis of guided wave generation during acoustic emission events (USC-ME-LAMSS-2001-101). Available at: http://www.me.sc.edu/Research/lamss/html/reports.html
11. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.03510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.035 ↗
12. Haider MF, Giurgiutiu V, Lin B, et al. (2017) Simulation of lamb wave propagation using excitation potentials. In: ASME 2017 pressure vessels and piping conference. Available at: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2660652
13. Hamstad MA (2010) Frequencies and amplitudes of AE signals in a plate as a function of source rise time. In: 29th European conference on acoustic emission testing. Available at: https://www.ndt.net/events/EWGAE%202010/proceedings/papers/20_Hamstad.pdf
14. Hamstad MA · Journal of Acoustic Emission · 1999 · 17 · 97
15. 10.1177/1045389X1350832910.1177/1045389X13508329 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0232313010.1007/BF02323130 ↗
17. 10.1515/crll.1858.55.2510.1515/crll.1858.55.25 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.01810.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.018 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1974.tb02446.x10.1111/j.1365-246X.1974.tb02446.x ↗
20. 10.1098/rspa.1917.000810.1098/rspa.1917.0008 ↗
21. Landau LD · 1970
22. Love AEH · 1944
23. 10.1080/0934984950940955510.1080/09349849509409555 ↗
24. Ohtsu M · Journal of Acoustic Emission · 1986 · 5 · 124
25. Pao YH · Elastic Waves and Nondestructive Testing of Materials · 1978 · 29 · 107
26. 10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00064-010.1016/S0143-974X(02)00064-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0301-679X(99)00077-810.1016/S0301-679X(99)00077-8 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-1-4899-5681-110.1007/978-1-4899-5681-1 ↗