journal article·2025-04-01Open access

Digital Fabrication of Biologically Cemented Spatial Structures

Karen Antorveza Paez, Andrea Shin Ling, Nijat Mahamaliyev, Georg Bauer, Benjamin Dillenburger

Abstract

The environmental impact of the construction industry demands sustainable alternatives to traditional concrete production. Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) offers an alternative solution where microbes can produce biocemented structures at a low cost and ambient temperature. This study integrates MICP with nonplanar granular 3D printing methods, overcoming casting limitations such as geometrical constraints and uneven calcification, enabling the creation of thin, porous structures with an increased surface, which is beneficial for biocementation. Our approach combines computational design, microbial techniques, and digital fabrication, presenting biocemented prototypes demonstrating Sporosarcina pasteurii ’s ability to achieve natural calcification in printed systems. Materials analysis confirms the microorganisms’ ability to produce more calcite in geometries that provide more surface exposure to the environment, which is a significant advance in large-scale 3D-printed biocemented structures. Moreover, even though 3D printing has already been demonstrated to be a viable means of fabricating small-scale structures capable of MICP, our study presents key steps toward 3D printing MICP-capable structures on a large scale, surpassing the typical small-scale demonstrators below 10 cm to samples above 20 cm in diameter.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Diatoms and Algae Research · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Building materials and conservation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architecture, Digital Building Technologies, Institute of Technology in Architecture (ITA), ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Environment UN. 2019. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction Sector. 2019. Available from: http://www.unep.org/resources/publication/2019-global-status-report-buildings-and-construction-sector [Last accessed: November1 2023].
2. Nguyen PQ, , Courchesne N-MD, , Duraj-Thatte A, et al. Engineered living materials: Prospects and challenges for using biological systems to direct the assembly of smart materials. Adv Mater, 2018; 30(19):e1704847; doi: 10.1002/adma.201704847
3. 10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.10000810.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100008 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41598-018-19895-w10.1038/s41598-018-19895-w ↗
5. Anonymous. Biomason: Revolutionizing Cement with Biotechnology n.d. Available from: https://biomason.com/ [Last accessed: April12 2023].
6. 10.1520/GTJ2017014810.1520/GTJ20170148 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.11.01110.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.11.011 ↗
8. 10.1007/s41315-021-00218-810.1007/s41315-021-00218-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engreg.2022.07.00210.1016/j.engreg.2022.07.002 ↗
10. 10.1007/s41693-023-00107-510.1007/s41693-023-00107-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mattod.2023.02.00110.1016/j.mattod.2023.02.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10903210.1016/j.matdes.2020.109032 ↗
13. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-081720-10530310.1146/annurev-matsci-081720-105303 ↗
14. 10.3390/en1604165010.3390/en16041650 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.023 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.005 ↗
17. 10.3389/fbioe.2016.0000410.3389/fbioe.2016.00004 ↗
18. 10.1089/3dp.2017.003710.1089/3dp.2017.0037 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12541-014-0516-510.1007/s12541-014-0516-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cad.2020.10288010.1016/j.cad.2020.102880 ↗
21. Leung Pok Yin Victor. DiRT: Distributed Robotic Tools for Spatial Timber Assembly with Integral Timber Joints. 2023. ET H Zürich PhD dissertation.
22. Huang Y Leung PYV Garrett C et al. The new analog: A protocol for linking design and construction intent with algorithmic planning for robotic assembly of complex structures. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication. SCF ’21. Association for Computing Machinery: New York NY USA; 2021; 1–17; doi: 10.1145/3485114.348512210.1145/3485114.3485122 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-3-642-38974-0_3310.1007/978-3-642-38974-0_33 ↗
24. 10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900040057x10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900040057x ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000287110.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002871 ↗
26. Wang Y, , Konstantinou C, , Soga K, et al. Enhancing strength of MICP-treated sandy soils: From micro to macro scale. ArXiv Geophys, 2020.
27. 10.3390/geotechnics303003610.3390/geotechnics3030036 ↗
28. Xin A, , Su Y, , Feng S, et al. Growing living composites with ordered microstructures and exceptional mechanical properties. Adv Mater, 2021; 33(13):e2006946; doi: 10.1002/adma.202006946
29. 10.3390/ma1305109310.3390/ma13051093 ↗
30. Arnardottir T. Turbulent Casting: Bacterial Expression in Mineralized Structures. ACADIA Distrib Prox. 2021.
31. 10.1016/j.matt.2019.11.01610.1016/j.matt.2019.11.016 ↗
32. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.114517710.3389/fbioe.2023.1145177 ↗
33. Armaly P Kirzner S Kashi Y et al. Biomanufacturing of architectural prototypes with cyanobacteria. Ahmedabad; 2023; pp. 149–158; doi: 10.52842/conf.caadria.2023.2.14910.52842/conf.caadria.2023.2.149 ↗