journal article·2022-10-01Open access

Development of 3D Printed Electrospun Scaffolds for the Fabrication of Porous Scaffolds for Vascular Applications

Jahnvi Bansal, Katelyn Neuman, Vaughn K. Greene, David A. Rubenstein

Abstract

Over the past two decades, electrospinning has emerged as a common technique to produce biomedical scaffolds composed of ultrafine fibers formed from many natural and synthetic polymers. A major advantage of this technique is the ability to produce scaffolds that resemble the native extracellular matrix in physical, chemical, and topological properties. However, scaffolds fabricated via electrospinning are not formed with a controlled architecture and typically do a poor job of directing cell growth into prescribed structures for tissue/organ development. To address these weaknesses, 3D bioprinting has recently been used to develop scaffolds that have a highly organized and precise global topology. Unfortunately, these 3D bioprinted scaffolds do not typically resemble the native extracellular matrix in physical properties, such as porosity, fiber diameter, and pore size (e.g., the microarchitecture). Thus, the goal of the current study was to develop a technique that harnesses the intrinsic advantages of both conventional electrospinning and 3D bioprinting techniques to produce scaffolds that have the potential to be used within biomedical applications. The physical properties of formed 3D printed electrospun scaffolds were compared with conventional electrospun and 3D printed scaffolds. Further, we conducted initial proof-of-concept biocompatibility studies to illustrate the applicability of the scaffolds within vascular applications. Our results illustrate that 3D printed electrospun scaffolds can be developed, via our technique, that have highly tailored and organized arbitrary geometries with scaffold properties in the range of the innate extracellular matrix. In addition, these scaffolds were shown to support endothelial cell growth. Therefore, we illustrate the development and testing of a novel bioscaffold fabrication technique that may be used for many tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications, which allows for the direct printing of electrospun scaffolds into well-defined macro-scale geometries that also retain the micro-structures commonly observed in electrospun scaffolds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1163/092050611X57695410.1163/092050611X576954 ↗
2. 10.1002/adhm.20170109510.1002/adhm.201701095 ↗
3. 10.3390/biom909047010.3390/biom9090470 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.06010.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.060 ↗
5. Formhals A. Process and apparatus for preparing artificial threads 1934; US Patent #: 1975504.
6. Formhals A. Method and apparatus for spinning 1939; US Patent #: 2160962.
7. 10.1088/1748-605X/ab07f110.1088/1748-605X/ab07f1 ↗
8. Rubenstein DA, , Greene Jr. VK, Yin W. Electrospun scaffold fiber orientation regulates endothelial cell and platelet properties assocaited with angiogenesis and hemocompatiblity. Materialia, 2020; 14:100942.
9. 10.1163/092050609X1255931714936310.1163/092050609X12559317149363 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.16310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.163 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.03410.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.034 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.04010.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.040 ↗
13. 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.018610.1089/ten.tea.2020.0186 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11953610.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0611-7_1410.1007/978-1-0716-0611-7_14 ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.aba740610.1126/sciadv.aba7406 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.01410.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4CP04801F10.1039/C4CP04801F ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20180051410.1002/adfm.201800514 ↗
20. 10.1155/2017/695679410.1155/2017/6956794 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nano.2020.10230610.1016/j.nano.2020.102306 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10788610.1016/j.matdes.2019.107886 ↗
23. Rivera ML Hudson SE. Desktop electrospinning a single extruder 3D printer for producing rigid plastic and electrospun textiles. In: Chi 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2019.10.1145/3290605.3300434 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.7b0715110.1021/acsami.7b07151 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.elstat.2019.10340610.1016/j.elstat.2019.103406 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10930410.1016/j.matdes.2020.109304 ↗
27. Chen S, , Galuskova D, , Kankova H, et al. Electrospun PCL fiber mats incorporating multi-targeted B and Co Co-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles for angiogenesis. Materials (Basel), 2020; 13:4040.
28. 10.1080/1073968070141017310.1080/10739680701410173 ↗
29. 10.1080/10717544.2020.179723910.1080/10717544.2020.1797239 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1209196210.3390/polym12091962 ↗
31. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0845-6_1310.1007/978-1-0716-0845-6_13 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0440210.1021/acsomega.0c04402 ↗
33. 10.1007/s13770-020-00263-710.1007/s13770-020-00263-7 ↗
34. 10.1371/journal.pone.024033210.1371/journal.pone.0240332 ↗
35. 10.1177/088532821773384910.1177/0885328217733849 ↗
36. 10.1002/jbm.b.3444410.1002/jbm.b.34444 ↗