Image quality enhancement technique for optical see-through displays across different ambient luminance levels
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates ambient-light–induced image-quality degradation in optical see-through (OST) displays and presents a perceptually driven enhancement method. Luma and chroma of input images are adjusted via power-law transformations to compensate for contrast loss and chroma reduction caused by additive mixing with ambient light. The adjustment parameters were empirically derived through psychophysical experiments and modeled using ambient light level (SR, %) and average image luma. Experimental results show that the proposed adjustment significantly improves perceived image quality across various OST viewing conditions. Analysis of observer feedback reveals that preferences are not driven by a simple maximization of brightness. Instead, the selections are guided by specific qualitative criteria, such as maintaining readability in dark regions, preserving highlight textures, and balancing light–dark organization for depth cues. These findings suggest that effective OST image compensation requires an approach that prioritizes these perceptual factors over global intensity adjustments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies · Image Enhancement Techniques · Ocular and Laser Science Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. E. Kruijff, J.E. Swan, S. Feiner, Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited, in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Mixed Augmented Reality (ISMAR), (2010), pp. 3–1210.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643530 ↗
2. A. Erickson, K. Kim, G. Bruder, G. Welch, Exploring the limitations of environment lighting on optical see-through head-mounted displays, in Proc. ACM Symp. Spatial User Interaction (SUI), (2020), pp. 1–910.1145/3385959.3418445 ↗
3. K. Moffitt, M. Browne, Visibility of color symbology in head-up and head-mounted displays in daylight environments. Opt. Eng. 58(5), 051809 (2019)10.1117/1.OE.58.5.051809 ↗
4. J.L. Gabbard, J.E. Swan II, D. Hix, S.J. Kim, M. McGee, More than meets the eye: An engineering study to empirically examine the blending of real and virtual color spaces, in Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Conf, (2010), pp. 79–8610.1109/VR.2010.5444808 ↗
5. C. Merenda, M. Smith, J. Gabbard, G. Burnett, D. Large, Effects of real-world backgrounds on user interface color naming and matching in automotive AR HUDs, in IEEE VR Workshop Perceptual Cognitive Issues in AR (PERCAR), (2016), pp. 1–610.1109/PERCAR.2016.7562419 ↗
6. N. Hassani, M.J. Murdoch, Investigating color appearance in optical see-through augmented reality. Color. Res. Appl. 44(4), 492–507 (2019)10.1002/col.22380 ↗
7. D. Hirobe, Y. Uranishi, J. Orlosky, S. Shirai, P. Ratsamee, H. Takemura, Objective measurements of background color shifts caused by optical see-through head-mounted displays, in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Mixed Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), 2022, pp. 828–83310.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct57072.2022.00084 ↗
8. M. Gattullo, A.E. Uva, M. Fiorentino, G. Monno, Effect of text outline and contrast polarity on AR text readability in industrial lighting. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 21(5), 638–651 (2015)
9. J.L. Gabbard, J.E. Swan, D. Hix, The effects of text drawing styles, background textures, and natural lighting on text legibility in outdoor augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 15(1), 16–32 (2006)10.1162/pres.2006.15.1.16 ↗
10. J. Kim, S.-W. Oh, J. Choi, S. Park, W. Kim, Optical see-through head-mounted display including transmittance-variable display for high visibility. J. Inf. Disp. 23(2), 121–127 (2022)10.1080/15980316.2021.2018058 ↗
11. J.D. Hincapié-Ramos, L. Ivanchuk, S.K. Sridharan, P.P. Irani, SmartColor: Real-time color and contrast correction for optical see-through head-mounted displays. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 21(12), 1336–1348 (2015)10.1109/TVCG.2015.2450745 ↗
12. K.K. Lee, J.W. Kim, J.H. Ryu, J.O. Kim, Ambient light robust gamut mapping for optical see-through displays. Opt. Express. 28(10), 15392–15406 (2020)10.1364/OE.391447 ↗
13. S. Lee, H. Ha, Y. Kwak, H. Kim, Y.-J. Seo, B. Yang, Preferred tone curve characteristics of transparent display under various viewing conditions, in Proc. SPIE 9395, (2015), pp. 93950Q10.1117/12.2077907 ↗
14. H. Kim, Y.-J. Seo, S. Lee, S.-C. Jo, Y. Kwak, The preferred type of tone-curve in a transparent OLED display. Color Imaging Conf. 2018(1), 101–105 (2018)10.2352/ISSN.2169-2629.2018.26.290 ↗
15. J.-H. Ryu, J.-W. Kim, J.-O. Kim, Enhanced reduction of color blending by a gamma-based image boosting method for optical see-through displays. Opt. Eng. 60(8), 083102 (2021)10.1117/1.OE.60.8.083102 ↗
16. M. Abbasi, P. Váz, J. Silva, P. Martins, Oct., Enhancing visual perception in immersive VR and AR environments: AI-driven color and clarity adjustments under dynamic lighting conditions. Technologies. 12(11), 216 (2024)10.3390/technologies12110216 ↗
17. S. Bianco, C. Cusano, and R. Schettini, Single and multiple illuminant estimation using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(9), 4347–4362 (2017)10.1109/TIP.2017.2713044 ↗
18. M. Lecca, STAR: A segmentation-based approximation of point-based sampling Milano Retinex for color image enhancement. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27(12), 5802–5812 (2018)10.1109/TIP.2018.2858541 ↗
19. Y. Kwak, H. Ha, S. Lee, H. Kim, Y.-J. Seo, B. Yang, Optimal monitor gamma of transparent display, in SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Papers, vol. 46, no. 1, (2015), pp. 196–19910.1002/sdtp.10311 ↗