Analysis of interfacial charges in aged co-host emitting layer of organic light-emitting diodes using impedance spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the charge injection and accumulation characteristics of organic lightemitting diodes (OLEDs) generated by spontaneous orientation polarization (SOP) of organic molecules.SOP enhances the electrical characteristics of OLED devices, such as charge injection and transport, by adjusting the interfacial charge density between the organic layers within the device.An OLED device with a mixed co-host emitting layer was fabricated to examine the degradation effect of SOP after electrical aging.Impedance spectroscopy (IS) revealed the presence of interfacial charges originating from the SOP of small molecules within the electron transport layer (ETL), in both pristine and aged devices.Furthermore, the IS simulation results using equivalent circuits were successfully interpreted based on the electrical properties of each organic layer in the pristine and aged devices.The electrical properties of the ETL, which contained 1,3,5-tris(N-phenyl benzimidazole-2yl)benzene (TPBi), were degraded, reducing hole accumulation and electron injection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Creative Convergence Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pi.197410.1002/pi.1974 ↗
2. 10.1117/12.82485610.1117/12.824856 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.491654910.1063/1.4916549 ↗
4. 10.1039/C9TC03092A10.1039/C9TC03092A ↗
5. 10.1166/jnn.2018.1558910.1166/jnn.2018.15589 ↗
6. 10.1002/adom.20220127810.1002/adom.202201278 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.496379610.1063/1.4963796 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2022.11710110.1016/j.synthmet.2022.117101 ↗
9. 10.1002/adom.20210100410.1002/adom.202101004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.04.02610.1016/j.orgel.2018.04.026 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0587110.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05871 ↗
12. 10.1088/0022-3727/44/11/11510310.1088/0022-3727/44/11/115103 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mtener.2021.10079410.1016/j.mtener.2021.100794 ↗
14. 10.1063/5.001169910.1063/5.0011699 ↗
15. V. Bender, N.D. Barth, F.B. Mendes, R.A. Pinto, T. Marchesan, and J.M.A. Alvarez, IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 3, 1190–1195 (2015).
16. 10.1063/1.477318810.1063/1.4773188 ↗
17. 10.3131/jvsj2.58.10910.3131/jvsj2.58.109 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0587110.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05871 ↗
19. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0075010.3389/fchem.2020.00750 ↗
20. 10.1002/jsid.95610.1002/jsid.956 ↗
21. 10.7567/1347-4065/ab0de710.7567/1347-4065/ab0de7 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.04.02610.1016/j.orgel.2018.04.026 ↗
23. 10.7567/1347-4065/ab0de810.7567/1347-4065/ab0de8 ↗
24. 10.1039/D0TC00893A10.1039/D0TC00893A ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20120361510.1002/adma.201203615 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20130373010.1002/adfm.201303730 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0632310.1021/acs.jpcc.1c06323 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.236126610.1063/1.2361266 ↗
29. 10.1080/15980316.2022.208975110.1080/15980316.2022.2089751 ↗
30. 10.1088/2053-1591/aacec610.1088/2053-1591/aacec6 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.12.00910.1016/j.orgel.2014.12.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.04.01810.1016/j.orgel.2017.04.018 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.481943610.1063/1.4819436 ↗
34. 10.1021/cm040081o10.1021/cm040081o ↗
35. 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.01.03510.1016/j.orgel.2019.01.035 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.02.01210.1016/j.orgel.2009.02.012 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.12.00510.1016/j.orgel.2010.12.005 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.orgel.2023.10685010.1016/j.orgel.2023.106850 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1566-1199(01)00009-X10.1016/S1566-1199(01)00009-X ↗
40. 10.1063/1.472434910.1063/1.4724349 ↗
41. 10.1016/S1566-1199(00)00007-010.1016/S1566-1199(00)00007-0 ↗
42. 10.1143/JJAP.49.01AA0110.1143/JJAP.49.01AA01 ↗