Nonplanar 3D Printing of Bifurcating Forms
Source abstract
Abstract
The introduction of robotic arms in additive manufacturing enables the scaling up of three-dimensional (3D) printing processes and the realization of nonplanar path geometries. As a result, novel design potential is unlocked by having control over the layered configuration of paths in the object, and 3D printing becomes viable for architectural applications. However, the various challenges associated with creating feasible nonplanar layered paths for the realization of large-scale objects are hindering their integration in the design process and broad use. This work presents methods that contribute to the flexible and intuitive design of nonplanar layered paths for robotic printing. We focus on the challenges related to the realization of single-shell bifurcating structures, with emphasis on the paths' behavior on the bifurcating moments of the shapes. Our methods are based on the use of design techniques that originate from implicit shape representation and on the detection of critical points on the surface through the lens of distance functions. We present fabricated prototypes printed with nonplanar paths that showcase the possibilities of our methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Advanced Vision and Imaging · Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Digital Building Technologies, Institute of Technology in Architecture (ITA), Faculty of Architecture, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Polyhedral Structures Laboratory, Weitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Sarakinioti M, , Konstantinou T, , Turrin M, et al. Development and prototyping of an integrated 3D-printed façade for thermal regulation in complex geometries. J Facade Design and Engineering, 2018; 6:29–40.
2. Mungenast Moritz 3F Studio. 3D-Printed Multifunctional Facade. 2019. https://www.3fstudio.de Accessed April08 2021.
3. Aectual. Pattern Terrazzo Floors. 2019. https://www.aectual.com/architectural-products/flooring/variants/pattern-terrazzo/intro Accessed April08 2021.
4. Jipa A, , Bernhard M, , Dillenburger B, et al. skelETHon formwork 3D printed plastic formwork for load-bearing concrete structures. Blucher Des Proc, 2017; 3:345–352.
5. Leschok M Dillenburger B. Dissolvable 3DP formwork. In: ACADIA 19: Ubiquity and Autonomy. Austin TX: Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) 2019 pp. 188–197.10.52842/conf.acadia.2019.188 ↗
6. 10.1089/3dp.2019.019710.1089/3dp.2019.0197 ↗
7. SHoP Architects. Design Miami. 2018. https://www.shoparc.com/projects/design-miami Accessed April19 2021.
8. Alisa Andrasek . High Resolution Architecture Cloud Perlgola. 2018. https://www.alisaandrasek.com/projects/cloud-pergola Accessed April19 2021.
9. 10.1007/978-981-15-6568-7_1010.1007/978-981-15-6568-7_10 ↗
10. Kwon H, , Eichenhofer M, , Kyttas T, et al. Digital composites: Robotic 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber-reinforced plastics for functionally-graded building components. In: Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design. 2018. Zurich: Springer;. 2019, pp. 363–376.
11. Mohamed H, , Bao DW, , Snooks R. Super composite: Carbon fibre infused 3D printed tectonics. In: Proceedings of the 2020 DigitalFUTURES. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 297–308.
12. 10.1016/j.cad.2017.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2017.04.001 ↗
13. Wu C, , Dai C, , Fang G, et al. RoboFDM: A robotic system for support-free fabrication using FDM. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017, pp. 1175–1180.
14. 10.1145/3197517.320134210.1145/3197517.3201342 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.403099810.1115/1.4030998 ↗
16. 10.1145/3414685.341783410.1145/3414685.3417834 ↗
17. Mitropoulou I Bernhard M Dillenburger B. Print paths key-framing: Design for non-planar layered robotic FDM printing. In: Symposium on Computational Fabrication. New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery 2020.10.1145/3424630.3425408 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cad.2007.10.01410.1016/j.cad.2007.10.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.08.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.12.01610.1016/j.rcim.2018.12.016 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.rcim.2020.10196710.1016/j.rcim.2020.101967 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cad.2019.05.00710.1016/j.cad.2019.05.007 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cag.2020.05.00710.1016/j.cag.2020.05.007 ↗
24. Luo L, , Baran I, , Rusinkiewicz S, et al. Partitioning models into 3D-printable parts. ACM Trans Graphics, 2012; 31:1–9.10.1145/2366145.2366148 ↗
25. 10.1111/cgf.1235310.1111/cgf.12353 ↗
26. 10.1145/2816795.281806410.1145/2816795.2818064 ↗
27. 10.1109/TASE.2019.293821910.1109/TASE.2019.2938219 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.gmod.2019.10103410.1016/j.gmod.2019.101034 ↗
29. de Goes F Desbrun M Tong Y. Vector field processing on triangle meshes. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Courses. California. New York: Association for Computing Machinery 2016.10.1145/2897826.2927303 ↗
30. Milnor J. Morse Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1963.
31. 10.1016/S0925-7721(02)00093-710.1016/S0925-7721(02)00093-7 ↗
32. Biasotti S De Floriani L Falcidieno B et al. Morphological Representations of Scalar Fields. In: Shape Analysis and Structuring. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2008 pp. 185–213.10.1007/978-3-540-33265-7_6 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tcs.2007.10.01810.1016/j.tcs.2007.10.018 ↗
34. 10.1080/00029890.1970.1199252310.1080/00029890.1970.11992523 ↗
35. Edelsbrunner H Harer J Natarajan V et al. Morse-Smale complexes for piecewise linear 3-manifolds. In: Nineteenth Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry. New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery 2003 pp. 361–370.10.1145/777792.777846 ↗
36. Dey T Giesen J Goswami S. Shape segmentation and matching with flow discretization. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Algorithms and Data Structures. WADS. Berlin: Springer 2003 pp. 25–36.10.1007/978-3-540-45078-8_3 ↗
37. Zhou Y Huang Z. Decomposing polygon meshes by means of critical points. In: 10th International Multimedia Modelling Conference. Queensland Australia: IEEE Computer Society 2004 pp. 187–195.
38. Biasotti S Falcidieno B Spagnuolo M. Extended reeb graphs for surface understanding and description. In: Discrete Geometry for Computer Imagery. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer 2000 pp. 185–197.10.1007/3-540-44438-6_16 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cagd.2006.02.00310.1016/j.cagd.2006.02.003 ↗
40. 10.1145/1015706.101576910.1145/1015706.1015769 ↗
41. 10.1145/2516971.251697710.1145/2516971.2516977 ↗
42. Frisken SF Perry RN. Designing with distance fields. In: International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications. Boston Massachusetts. New York USA: Association for Computing Machinery 2005 pp. 60–66.
43. Quilez I . Smooth Minimum. 2013. https://www.iquilezles.org/www/articles/smin/smin.htm Accessed January19 2021.
44. Korndörfer J Keinert B Ganse U et al. HG_SDF: A glsl library for building signed distance functions. 2015. https://mercury.sexy/hg_sdf Accessed January19 2021.
45. Mitropoulou I Burger J . COMPAS_SLICER: Slicing functionality for COMPAS. 2020. https://github.com/compas-dev/compas_slicer Accessed January19 2021.
46. Van Mele T Liew A Méndez Echenagucia T et al. COMPAS: A framework for computational research in architecture and structures. 2017. https://compas.dev Accessed January19 2021.
47. Jacobson A Panozzo D others. libigl: A simple C++ geometry processing library. 2018. https://libigl.github.io Accessed January25 2021.
48. Rutten D. Robert McNeel & Associates. Grasshopper. 2007. https://www.grasshopper3d.com Accessed January25 2021.
49. Bernhard M. Axolotl. https://www.food4rhino.com/app/axolotl Accessed January25 2021.