Light extraction film for organic light-emitting diodes based on an eco-friendly template comprising cellulose and polyphenon 60
Source abstract
Abstract
The demand for eco-friendly, alternative materials and processes is increasing across various industries to substitute petroleum-based materials, which have negative environmental impacts. Therefore, this study developed an environmentally sustainable template using polyphenon 60 (P60) extracted from green tea and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) via a solvent-free process employing only deionized water. The template surface exhibited randomly distributed microscale aggregates owing to the chemical interactions between HEC and P60, with their morphology varying as a function of the P60 concentration. The quantitative analysis utilizing fill factor calculations demonstrated that increased P60 concentration led to a higher aggregate density and larger structure sizes as the fill factor values increased from 21% at 1.5 wt% to 45% at 2.0 wt% and 86% at 2.5 wt%. This precise modulation of the P60 concentration enabled systematic control over the aggregate size and density, offering a significant advantage in optimizing the structural properties of the enhanced optical performance template. The light extraction film showed enhanced efficiency of up to 29.5% in all directions when integrated into an organic light-emitting diode (OLED), validating the effectiveness of the proposed method in improving device performance. These findings highlight a scalable and sustainable approach for advancing OLED display and lighting technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tea Polyphenols and Effects · Dye analysis and toxicity · Color Science and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hanbat National University
Reality Device Research Division
Pukyong National University
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15373010.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153730 ↗
2. 10.3390/nu1503061710.3390/nu15030617 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.10750110.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107501 ↗
4. 10.3390/ijerph19201322310.3390/ijerph192013223 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.00110.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.00910.1016/j.rser.2006.05.009 ↗
7. 10.1039/C9QM00716D10.1039/C9QM00716D ↗
8. 10.1039/C9QM00042A10.1039/C9QM00042A ↗
9. 10.1038/lsa.2017.16810.1038/lsa.2017.168 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41377-020-0341-910.1038/s41377-020-0341-9 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.orgel.2022.10658010.1016/j.orgel.2022.106580 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20130340110.1002/adfm.201303401 ↗
13. 10.1007/s13391-021-00303-x10.1007/s13391-021-00303-x ↗
14. 10.1364/OE.39778910.1364/OE.397789 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.08.02910.1016/j.orgel.2016.08.029 ↗
16. 10.1080/15980316.2024.232535710.1080/15980316.2024.2325357 ↗
17. 10.1002/adom.20180101510.1002/adom.201801015 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.10.04210.1016/j.orgel.2016.10.042 ↗
19. 10.1080/15980316.2022.212795010.1080/15980316.2022.2127950 ↗
20. 10.1080/15980316.2018.153107310.1080/15980316.2018.1531073 ↗
21. 10.1080/14686996.2018.155104010.1080/14686996.2018.1551040 ↗
22. 10.1080/15980316.2024.243411010.1080/15980316.2024.2434110 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20200159110.1002/adma.202001591 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.02110.1016/j.rser.2012.02.021 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.04010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.040 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.02.02510.1016/j.ejpb.2015.02.025 ↗
27. 10.1080/07315724.2006.1071951810.1080/07315724.2006.10719518 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.06.01110.1016/j.lfs.2007.06.011 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.04410.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.044 ↗
30. 10.1039/D4SE01443J10.1039/D4SE01443J ↗
31. 10.3390/molecules2814537010.3390/molecules28145370 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.01210.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.012 ↗
33. 10.1002/bip.1049910.1002/bip.10499 ↗
34. 10.1039/C4RA04171B10.1039/C4RA04171B ↗