Development of a test equipment for pesticide protective fabric evaluation and studies on simple cotton woven fabrics
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, efforts were taken to identify the most suitable cotton fabric with commonly used structure to be used as protective fabric by the pesticide applicators in the tropical regions, specifically at the time of spraying in the field. As the situation demanded the generation and use of pesticide-borne air for the evaluation of cotton fabrics considered in the study, a test equipment with appropriate features was developed and used. The study revealed that twill fabrics of medium weight construction provide better protection than plain fabrics, especially when they are produced with coarser yarns to achieve the required fabric weight. They are found to give enhanced protection when they are subjected to raising operation. Fabric raised on both the sides performs better than the face side raised fabric. On the contrary, these fabrics in raised or unraised state are found to slightly go down in their performance when they are wet and their performance decreases with increase in wetness. Hence, it is suggested that use of raised fabrics may be avoided for the preparation of pesticide protective clothing as the pesticide applicators are bound to sweat at the time of spraying. As the unraised fabrics give comparatively lower performance reduction on wetting, it can be recommended for the pesticide applicators with the instruction to change the clothing when it become wet to ensure protection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Research in Cotton Cultivation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile Technology, Anna University, Chennai, India
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. The Energy and Resources Institute, India, http://www.teri.res.in/teriin/news/terivsn/issue31/pesticid.htm (assessed 6 July 2008).
2. Mathur SC · Pesticide Information · 1999 · 24 · 9
3. 10.1179/oeh.2006.12.3.22810.1179/oeh.2006.12.3.228 ↗
4. Consumption of Pesticides (Technical-Grade Insecticides) for Agriculture in India (2003-2004 to 2007-2008), http://www.indiastat.com/agriculture/2/consumptionofpesticides/206872/stats.aspx (assessed 21 May 2008).
5. 10.1021/bk-1985-0273.ch01710.1021/bk-1985-0273.ch017 ↗
6. 10.1080/00039896.1971.1066598710.1080/00039896.1971.10665987 ↗
7. 10.1080/00039896.1972.1066613010.1080/00039896.1972.10666130 ↗
8. Spiewak R · Ann Agric Environ Med · 2001 · 8 · 1
9. Fraser AJ
10. Toxicity and hazard, British Columbia, Ministry of Agriculture, http://www.agf.gov.bc.ca/pesticides/b_2.htm (assessed 21 July 2010).
11. Pesticides: health and safety, Personal Protective Equipment, http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/safety/workers/equip.htm (assessed 21 July 2010).
12. The Ohio State University. Protective clothing for pesticide users, http://ohioline.osu.edu/b750/b750_2.html (assessed 21 July 2010).
13. Shaw A, Normula R and Patel B. Protective clothing and application control for pesticide applicators in India: a field study. In: Nelson CN and Henry NW (eds) Performance of protective clothing: issues and priorities for the 21st century, Seventh Volume, ASTM STP 1386 . West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2000, pp. 342–353.10.1520/STP14456S ↗
14. Raheel M · J Environ Health · 1988 · 51 · 82
15. Shaw A, Cohen E and Wicke H. Personal protective equipment for agricultural workers. Industrial Fabric Product Review . 2000, pp. 48–59.
16. Mansfield RG. Polypropylene in nonwovens: products and participants. Nonwovens Industry . 1985, p. 26 and 30.
17. Ward D · Textile Month · 1982 · 48 · 17
18. Ko LL · Text Chem Color Amer Dyestuff Report · 2000 · 32 · 34
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.06110.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.061 ↗
20. ISO 6530:2005 · 2005
21. EN 14786:2006
22. ASTM F 2130-11 · 2011
23. Spray right to avoid drift, Best Management Practices, Spray drift, Fact sheet, July 2008. Grains Research and Development Corporation, http://www.grdc.com.au/uploads/documents/GRDC_FS_Spray.pdf (assessed 11 December 2008).
24. Weather for pesticide spraying, Australian Government, Bureau of Meteorology, ABN 92 637 533 532, http://www.bom.gov.au/info/leaflets/Pesticide-Spraying.pdf (assessed 11 December 2008).
25. Guidelines on Good Practice for Ground Application of Pesticides, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2001, http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/Y2767E/Y2767E00.htm (assessed 10 December 2008).
26. Crop protection, Pesticides: Safe use of pesticides, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, http://agritech.tnau.ac.in/crop_protection/crop_prot_pesticides_safe%20use%20of%20pesticides.html (assessed 10 December 2008).
27. Federal Register · 1973
28. 10.1007/BF0168972710.1007/BF01689727 ↗
29. Cheminova Agro A/S · 1991
30. Occupational Health Services · 1991
31. McPherson MJ. Heat and humidity, Psychrometry: The study of moisture in air, http://www.mvsengineering.com/filelibrary/file_17.pdf (assessed 15 January 2009).
32. 10.1177/00405175950650050810.1177/004051759506500508 ↗
33. Keaschall JL
34. Laughlin JM
35. 10.1007/BF0170236710.1007/BF01702367 ↗
36. 10.1007/BF0105515810.1007/BF01055158 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0116030810.1007/BF01160308 ↗
38. 10.1007/BF0170219410.1007/BF01702194 ↗
39. 10.1007/BF0160561210.1007/BF01605612 ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0161108710.1007/BF01611087 ↗
41. 10.1007/BF0169846110.1007/BF01698461 ↗
42. 10.1007/BF0105540410.1007/BF01055404 ↗
43. 10.1177/00405175830530110810.1177/004051758305301108 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0040-6031(97)00325-010.1016/S0040-6031(97)00325-0 ↗
45. 10.1177/00405175980680040610.1177/004051759806800406 ↗