Modeling the relationship between tactile sensation and physical properties of synthetic leather
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface texture plays an important role in expressing the tactile sensation of leather. The purpose of this study was to develop a combinational panel of physical properties that express the tactile sensations of coarse/fine, uneven/flat, soft/hard, sticky/slippery, and moist/dry. Thirteen synthetic leather samples were fabricated from polyurethane, and eight physical properties were measured as storage modulus, loss modulus, surface roughness, waviness, mean frictional coefficient, apparent contact angle, contact angle hysteresis, and urethane thickness. Thirty adult women performed sensory evaluation of the five tactile sensations by using a semantic differential method based on a five-point scale. The tactile sensation–physical property model for each tactile sensation was explored with logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the proposed models based on multiple physical properties clearly distinguish the tactile sensations with higher sensitivity and specificity compared to using a single physical property. The dynamic viscoelasticity contributed to all the tactile sensations when polyurethane was used as synthetic leather. Additionally, the difference of five tactile sensations might be caused by the surface roughness, the mean frictional coefficient, and the polyurethane thickness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Multisensory perception and integration · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan
Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd, Chiba, Japan
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.02.05210.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.02.052 ↗
2. Maia I · Mater Sci Eng · 2017 · 254 · 1
3. 10.1109/TOH.2012.3210.1109/TOH.2012.32 ↗
4. 10.3758/BF0320691610.3758/BF03206916 ↗
5. 10.1080/089902203100008382510.1080/0899022031000083825 ↗
6. 10.3758/BF0319353710.3758/BF03193537 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.03.02510.1016/j.neucom.2017.03.025 ↗
8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-12-03823.199010.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-12-03823.1990 ↗
9. 10.1037/0735-7044.106.2.27410.1037/0735-7044.106.2.274 ↗
10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-19-07480.199710.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-19-07480.1997 ↗
11. Kimura F, Yamamoto A and Higuchi T. Development of a 2-DOF softness feeling display for tactile tele-presentation of deformable surfaces. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation , Anchorage, USA, 3–7 May 2010, Paper No. 11431456, pp.1822–1827. New York: IEEE.10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509688 ↗
12. 10.1109/TOH.2009.3410.1109/TOH.2009.34 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.triboint.2016.02.03110.1016/j.triboint.2016.02.031 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tins.2016.04.00810.1016/j.tins.2016.04.008 ↗
15. Sokabe T · Brain Nerve · 2009 · 61 · 867
16. 10.4188/transjtmsj.26.P72110.4188/transjtmsj.26.P721 ↗
17. 10.1533/9780857090645.2.21610.1533/9780857090645.2.216 ↗
18. Zuo H, Hope T and Jones M. Tactile aesthetics of materials and design. In: Elvin K, Owain P and Valentina R (eds) Materials Experience . Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014, pp. 27–37.10.1016/B978-0-08-099359-1.00003-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.02110.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.021 ↗
20. Chen X · Int J Des · 2009 · 3 · 67
21. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.02.00310.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.02.003 ↗
22. 10.4188/jte.57.13910.4188/jte.57.139 ↗
23. Chiba T · Lifesupport · 2018 · 30 · 44
24. Hosmer D · Commun Statist · 1983 · 148 · 839
25. 10.1093/biomet/59.1.1910.1093/biomet/59.1.19 ↗
26. 10.1097/00004424-198903000-0001210.1097/00004424-198903000-00012 ↗
27. ISO 139: 2005. Textiles – Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing.
28. 10.3758/BF0321135110.3758/BF03211351 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00221000034810.1007/s002210000348 ↗
30. Wolfram E · 1978 · 213
31. Edward Y, Bormashenko. Wetting of real surfaces, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013, pp. 50.10.1515/9783110258790 ↗
32. 10.1021/am405513k10.1021/am405513k ↗
33. O'Brien R · Qual Quant · 2007 · 41
34. 10.1371/journal.pone.014841410.1371/journal.pone.0148414 ↗
35. Hanley JA · Diagn Radiol · 1982 · 143 · 29
36. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.09.00710.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.09.007 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.11.00910.1016/j.triboint.2008.11.009 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11249-011-9854-y10.1007/s11249-011-9854-y ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.03310.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.033 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.bsbt.2017.02.00210.1016/j.bsbt.2017.02.002 ↗