journal article·2021-03

Cellulose acetate and polyvinylidene fluoride nanofiber mats for N95 respirators

C Akduman

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 50· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanofibrous media have a low basis weight, high permeability and small pore size that make them appropriate for a wide range of filtration applications, particularly for smaller particles. In contrast to electrostatic filter media, nanofibers' filtration efficiencies depend on the mechanical filtration mechanism and do not degrade with time. In this study, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) requirements for the N95 particulate filtering half mask were achieved using electrospun cellulose acetate (CA) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofiber coated polypropylene spunbond layers. Specifically, 16 and 15% (w/v), and 14, 12 and 10% (w/w) polymer concentrations were selected for CA nanofibers and PVDF nanofibers, respectively, to adjust the nanofiber diameters. The diameters of CA and PVDF nanofibers were decreased with decreasing polymer concentration for both CA (319.02 to 264.02 nm) and PVDF (236.50 to 142.59 nm) nanofibers. The thickness of the electrospun 16CA, 15CA and 14PVDF, 12PVDF, 10PVDF mats was adjusted by varying the collection period (15 min, 30 min, 60 min). The effects of electrospun CA and PVDF nanofiber diameter on the pore size and the thickness of the mats were compared in terms of filtration performance. 16CA with a nanofiber diameter of 319.02 nm had the largest first bubble point of 26.5 µm and mean flow pore size of 5.71 µm at 15 min with a thickness of 0.019 mm. The smallest first bubble point and mean flow pore values and the smallest pore size were achieved with the finest nanofibers of 10PVDF. Filtration performances were given as initial penetration and air flow resistance (ΔP). 16CA-60 min and 15CA-30 min mats both met the NIOSH requirements with their bulky structure. For PVDF, thinner nanofibers with smaller pores were produced compared to the CA nanofibers, and the NIOSH requirements were only achieved using double-layered, face-to-face 10PVDF-15 min nanofiber mats with the penetration of 1.85% and ΔP of 33.87 mmH 2 O.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Textile Technology, Denizli Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1545962090312008610.1080/15459620903120086 ↗
2. 10.1080/1542811989101038910.1080/15428119891010389 ↗
3. 10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.039010.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0390 ↗
4. Health C for D and R. Medical devices – masks and N95 respirators. US Food and Drug Administration, www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ucm055977.htm (2017, accessed 10 December 2017).
5. HSA Health Sciences Authority, HSA consumer guide, www.hsa.gov.sg/content/dam/HSA/HPRG/Consumer_Information/Public%20Advisories/Influenza_A_H1N1_information/consumer_advisories/HSAConsumerGuide-MakingInformedDecisionsWhenBuyingMasks_Respirators-FINAL-Aug09.pdf (2009, accessed 3 December 2018).
6. Hutten IM. Air filter applications, filtration mechanisms and theory, properties of nonwoven filter media. In: Hutten IM (ed.) Handbook of nonwoven filter media . Oxford: Elsevier, 2016, pp.423–519, 53–60, 108–157.10.1016/B978-0-08-098301-1.00003-4 ↗
7. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Respiratory protective equipment at work: a practical guide, www.hse.gov.uk/pUbns/priced/hsg53.pdf (2017, accessed 10 December 2017).
8. Pathak V · 3M Personal Safety Division · 2016 · 2 · 2
9. 10.1016/B978-185617375-9/50006-710.1016/B978-185617375-9/50006-7 ↗
10. 10.1080/15459624.2016.122515710.1080/15459624.2016.1225157 ↗
11. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100575-0.00006-110.1016/B978-0-08-100575-0.00006-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.01810.1016/j.ajic.2005.08.018 ↗
13. 10.1080/02786826.2013.82920910.1080/02786826.2013.829209 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1004-9541(12)60356-510.1016/S1004-9541(12)60356-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.09.02110.1016/j.ajic.2008.09.021 ↗
16. 10.1080/1047322005007561710.1080/10473220050075617 ↗
17. 10.1080/1529866939135432410.1080/15298669391354324 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0304-3886(01)00160-710.1016/S0304-3886(01)00160-7 ↗
19. 10.1177/152808370707813310.1177/1528083707078133 ↗
20. 10.1177/152808371454069610.1177/1528083714540696 ↗
21. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/14/R0110.1088/0957-4484/17/14/R01 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.01710.1016/j.ces.2016.07.017 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0015-1882(08)70092-210.1016/S0015-1882(08)70092-2 ↗
24. 10.1039/C5TA06543G10.1039/C5TA06543G ↗
25. 10.1016/S0015-1882(08)70256-810.1016/S0015-1882(08)70256-8 ↗
26. Li X · J Chem · 2015
27. Skaria SD · Ann Occup Hyg · 2014 · 58 · 771
28. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/12/02110.1088/0957-4484/17/12/021 ↗
29. Leung WW. Nanofiber filter facemasks and cabin filters. Patent No. 2008/0264259 A1, USA, 2008.
30. Conlon M. A facemask having one or more nanofiberlayers. Patent No. 2013/0284069 A1, USA, 2016.
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0057910.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00579 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10853-007-1786-410.1007/s10853-007-1786-4 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01633.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01633.x ↗
34. 10.1155/2012/89289410.1155/2012/892894 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00181-710.1016/S0376-7388(99)00181-7 ↗
36. 10.1002/app.2014110.1002/app.20141 ↗
37. 10.3993/jfbim0027210.3993/jfbim00272 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.01410.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.008 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.5b1135610.1021/acsami.5b11356 ↗
41. 10.1002/marc.20110004010.1002/marc.201100040 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.03.05710.1016/j.electacta.2004.03.057 ↗
43. 10.1039/C3TA14264G10.1039/C3TA14264G ↗
44. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.03010.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.030 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.04410.1016/j.memsci.2005.04.044 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.06910.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.069 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.03810.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.038 ↗
48. 10.1002/jbm.b.3272410.1002/jbm.b.32724 ↗
49. 10.2174/1874088X0110501005110.2174/1874088X01105010051 ↗
50. Frederick TJ, Mitchell MG and Partin LR. Process for preparatıon of cellulose acetate fılters for use in paper makıng. Patent No. 5,662,773, USA, 1997.
51. Wen J · Beitr zur Tab Int Contrib Tob Res · 2014 · 26 · 121
52. 10.1007/s12221-009-0177-710.1007/s12221-009-0177-7 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.02310.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.023 ↗
54. 10.1088/1757-899X/230/1/01204310.1088/1757-899X/230/1/012043 ↗
55. ASTM International · ASTM Int · 2014 · 3 · 1
56. 10.1080/15459624.2013.81822910.1080/15459624.2013.818229 ↗
57. 42 CFR Part 84 Standard, https://www.tsi.com/getmedia/d6ba7ce6-4320-4d52-954b-47034fd63cc0/AFT-001_1-42CFR84-appnote?ext=.pdf (accessed 17 April 2019).
58. 42 CFR Part 84 – Testing Modes. The standard application procedure for the approval of air-purifying filtering facepiece respirators under 42 CFR Part 84 table of contents. 2018, pp.1–81. https://www.tsi.com/getmedia/53243666-aa99-4c0f-9ac9-eba0b0ffb4c1/AFT-002_2-42CFR84_Testing_Modes?ext=.pdf (accessed 17 April 2019).
59. TSI Incorporated. Certitest® automated filter testers models 8127 and 8130, www.tsi.com/getmedia/55d5d5f8-df43-4513-8ea8-33ccf61e956d/8127-8130_1931214_USA_web?ext=.pdf (2012, accessed 11 June 2019).
60. Brown P and Cox CL. Fibrous filter media, https://login.e.bibl.liu.se/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=cat00115a&AN=lkp.915634&lang=sv&site=eds-live&scope=site%0Ahttps://login.e.bibl.liu.se/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081 (2017, accessed 11 June 2019).
61. 10.1016/S0014-3057(03)00096-X10.1016/S0014-3057(03)00096-X ↗
62. 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.05610.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.056 ↗
63. Grafe TH and Graham KM. Nanofiber webs from electrospinning. In: Nonwovens in filtration-fifth international conference , vol. 5, Stuttgart, Germany, 2003; pp.1–5. Minneapolis, MN: Donaldson Company Inc.
64. Chase G. What is slip-flow and how does it affect filter performance ? USA: The American Filtration and Separations Society (AFS).
65. Chase GG, Swaminathan S and Raghavan B. Functional nanofibers for filtration applications. In: Wei Q (ed.) Functional nanofibers and their applications . Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012, pp.121–152.10.1533/9780857095640.2.121 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.02210.1016/j.ces.2006.07.022 ↗