Effect of different hole shape of thermal barrier on the performance for thermal protective clothing
Source abstract
Abstract
The insulating layer of the hollow structure of thermal protective clothing plays a positive role in weight and thermal protection. The relationship between the hole shape and the performance of the hollow structure is of great importance to optimization. This paper focuses on the performance optimization of the honeycomb structure insulation layer. Laser cutting technology was used to cut the hole in the non-woven fabric. The thermal insulation layers of five common three-dimensional sections were prepared by the multi-layer composite method. Compared with the conventional solid fabric system, the honeycomb fabric system has better thermal protection. At the same time, the section structure also affects the thermal protection performance. The developed A-type structure possesses a superior Thermal Protective Performance value in comparison to I-type straight structure. It has lower moisture resistance and higher total heat loss. The thermal protection of A-type section structure, together with excellent thermal and moisture comfort, make it put forward the improvement direction for the structural optimization of commercial nonwovens where the balance between thermal protection and thermal and moisture comfort is the key requirement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Aerogels and thermal insulation · Thermoregulation and physiological responses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Fashion and Design, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
Key Laboratory of Clothing Design and Technology, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/001401303100012196810.1080/0014013031000121968 ↗
2. 10.1080/0040516920868885610.1080/00405169208688856 ↗
3. 10.1177/00405175830530080610.1177/004051758305300806 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10694-010-0151-310.1007/s10694-010-0151-3 ↗
5. 10.1177/004051751038010810.1177/0040517510380108 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.01.04110.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.01.041 ↗
7. 10.1080/00405167.2016.117947710.1080/00405167.2016.1179477 ↗
8. 10.3993/jfbi0920130910.3993/jfbi09201309 ↗
9. 10.1080/00405000.2014.93980810.1080/00405000.2014.939808 ↗
10. 10.1177/152808371771616710.1177/1528083717716167 ↗
11. Hoffele S · Int Nonwovens J · 2005 · 14 · 10
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.05.02610.1016/j.compositesa.2018.05.026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.07610.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.076 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12221-010-0731-310.1007/s12221-010-0731-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.10344410.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103444 ↗
16. Li H · J Text Res · 2008 · 29 · 84
17. 10.1007/s10853-012-6252-210.1007/s10853-012-6252-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.02.02010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.02.020 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11301610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113016 ↗
20. 10.1080/00405000.2021.201166310.1080/00405000.2021.2011663 ↗
21. Du F · J Ind Text · 2019 · 50 · 1
22. 10.1080/08916152.2014.94043310.1080/08916152.2014.940433 ↗
23. Zhang H · J Text Res · 2019 · 40 · 147
24. Hou Y · J Text Res · 2019 · 40 · 109
25. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.11440810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114408 ↗
26. Huang Y · Comput Appl Chem · 2016 · 33 · 6
27. Liu C · J Propul Technol · 2019
28. NFPA 1971, Standard on Protective Ensembles for Structural Fire Fighting.
29. ISO 11092: 2014, Textiles - Physiological effects - Measurement of thermal and water-vapour resistance under steady-state conditions (sweating guarded-hotplate test).