Influence of honeycomb structures on fluids transmission and heat retention properties; An initiative towards stretchable weaves
Source abstract
Abstract
The aesthetics and functionality of honeycomb woven assemblies qualifies them for a range of applications expanding across home textiles, fashion, functional apparels, and technical products. Researchers have explored honeycomb assemblies with the focus on shrinkage, sound absorption, thermal conductivity, and heat protection properties analysis via variation in their cell sizes. However, very minimal research is found on analysis of honeycomb woven fabric assemblies’ thermal comfort characteristics by employing different weft insertion sequence and materials (cotton and stretchable yarns). This study reflects the thermal conductivity, dry fluid transmission (air permeability), wet fluid transmission (moisture management), and stiffness attributes of twelve stretchable honeycomb woven assemblies consisting of single ridge, double ridge, and brighton honeycomb weave structures along with different weft sequences of cotton and Type 400 (T-400) stretch yarns. Characterization data showed that single ridge honeycomb structure supports the highest dry fluid transmission property; however, brighton honeycomb offers the highest heat retention property. Double ridge honeycomb highlights the capability of the highest wet fluid transmission property, and brighton honeycomb has immense stiffness. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) also showed that honeycomb structures, weft yarn sequence and material have a statistically significant impact on thermal conductivity and fluid transmission behaviors with p -values less than 0.05.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Textile University
RMIT University
North Carolina State University
NC State University
Funding
Higher Education Commission, Pakistan
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2024.10923510.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2024.109235 ↗
2. 10.1177/0040517524126452210.1177/00405175241264522 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-3-031-44927-7_410.1007/978-3-031-44927-7_4 ↗
4. Cao X, Pervaiz S, Abbas A, et al. A comprehensive study on physical properties of Jacquard knitted camouflage. J Text Inst 2023, Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00405000.2023.2297322
5. 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.10165810.1016/j.tsep.2023.101658 ↗
6. 10.1177/1558925022112546110.1177/15589250221125461 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.10195010.1016/j.tsep.2023.101950 ↗
8. Lin JP. Analysis of mechanism and main factors of honeycomb weave honeycomb effect. Adv Mat Res 2013; 739: 183–189.
9. 10.1177/152808371985184410.1177/1528083719851844 ↗
10. 10.1155/2015/47045610.1155/2015/470456 ↗
11. Malčiauskienė E, Milašius R, Rukuižienė Ž. Investigation of linen honeycomb weave fabric shrinkage after laundering in pure water. Fibres Text East Eur 2008; 6(6): 28–31.
12. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.10814810.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108148 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11431-015-5869-110.1007/s11431-015-5869-1 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.09.01310.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.09.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.09.04210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.09.042 ↗
16. 10.1177/004051751456192110.1177/0040517514561921 ↗
17. 10.1177/004051750708785510.1177/0040517507087855 ↗
18. 10.1177/004051751875800110.1177/0040517518758001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.10857410.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108574 ↗
20. 10.3389/fchem.2018.0017510.3389/fchem.2018.00175 ↗
21. 10.1080/00405000.2015.104525410.1080/00405000.2015.1045254 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.2033810.1002/pen.20338 ↗
23. Seyam AM. Structural design of woven fabrics : theory and practice : a critical appreciation of recent developments. Manchester, England: Textile Institute, 2002, p. 36.
24. 10.1080/00405000.2024.237549010.1080/00405000.2024.2375490 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.05.01710.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2010.05.017 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.10643210.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106432 ↗
27. 10.1108/RJTA-10-2021-012310.1108/RJTA-10-2021-0123 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.10195010.1016/j.tsep.2023.101950 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.04.00310.1016/j.commatsci.2013.04.003 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.10689810.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.106898 ↗
31. 10.1080/15440478.2022.216303010.1080/15440478.2022.2163030 ↗
32. 10.1108/IJCST-10-2017-016310.1108/IJCST-10-2017-0163 ↗
33. 10.1177/1558925022114891710.1177/15589250221148917 ↗
34. 10.3993/jfbi1220090110.3993/jfbi12200901 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.10194610.1016/j.tsep.2023.101946 ↗
36. Uhlemann J, Stranghöner N, Motevalli M, et al. Architectural woven polyester fabrics: examination of possible classification of stiffness values in correlation with strength values. Architect Eng Des Manag 2021; 17: 1–18. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17452007.2020.1793720
37. 10.1080/00405000.2022.215763610.1080/00405000.2022.2157636 ↗
38. 10.1177/1558925023115339810.1177/15589250231153398 ↗