journal article·2022-06Open access

Effects of D-lactide content and molecular weight on the morphological, thermal, and mechanical properties of electrospun nanofiber polylactide mats

Handan Palak, Ece Güler, Mohammadreza Nofar, Burçak Karagüzel Kayaoğlu

Journal of Industrial Textiles· Volume 51· Issue 2_suppl

Abstract

In this study, the effects of both D-lactide content, that is, the change in PLA crystallizability, and molecular weight of polylactide (PLA) on its electrospinning behavior, along with thermal and mechanical properties of the electrospun mats were investigated. Although the effect of D-lactide content on processability of PLA has been studied in extrusion, thermoforming, foaming, and melt spinning, it has not been explored in electrospinning. The current study aimed to analyze electrospinnability of three different PLA grades; two amorphous with high and low molecular weights (i.e., aPLA-H and aPLA-L) and a semicrystalline with a high molecular weight (cPLA-H). PLAs were dissolved at different concentrations in chloroform (CHL)/dimethylformamide (DMF) at various volume ratios. Due to its high crystallizability and molecular weight, coarser nanofibers of cPLA-H were produced from solvents with high CHL content (≥75%), resulting in highest water vapor transmission rate (50,000 g/m 2 .day) of mats. aPLA-H revealed coarser nanofibers than that of aPLA-L due to its higher molecular entanglement. Although the increase in DMF content in the solvent hindered dissolving and electrospinning of cPLA-H, it caused the refinement of nanofibers in amorphous PLAs. Despite similar tensile strength, cPLA-H showed higher elongation at break (∼69%) than that of aPLA-H (∼59%) possibly due to the existence of some beads within the fibers in aPLA-H. Storage modulus of electrospun cPLA-H was also higher (∼15MPa) than that of other samples (∼10–12 MPa) due to high content of crystallinity (∼37%) while aPLA-L revealed the lowest storage modulus (∼10MPa) due to its amorphous structure and low molecular entanglement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Textile Engineering, Faculty of Textile Technologies and Design, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey

Sustainable & Green Plastics Laboratory (SGPL), Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey

References (85)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.00210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.20510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.205 ↗
3. 10.1002/mabi.20040004310.1002/mabi.200400043 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.53410.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.534 ↗
6. Nofar M · 2021
7. Gholipour-Kanani A · Trends Biomater Artif Organs · 2010 · 24 · 93
8. 10.1155/2013/49570810.1155/2013/495708 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.01410.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.04010.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.040 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10806110.1016/j.matdes.2019.108061 ↗
12. 10.1177/15589250150100041110.1177/155892501501000411 ↗
13. 10.1186/2055-7124-18-510.1186/2055-7124-18-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.003 ↗
15. 10.1111/1750-3841.1509410.1111/1750-3841.15094 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.02810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.028 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12676810.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126768 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.03710.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.037 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.21110.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.211 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.12.02510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.12.025 ↗
21. 10.3390/app905101410.3390/app9051014 ↗
22. 10.3390/s1916358710.3390/s19163587 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.01.00610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.01.006 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.02810.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.028 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.2148110.1002/app.21481 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.02610.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.026 ↗
27. 10.1002/aic.69045011610.1002/aic.690450116 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70200-510.1016/S1369-7021(10)70200-5 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.281549910.1063/1.2815499 ↗
30. 10.2174/18722100878636968810.2174/187221008786369688 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ces.2007.06.00710.1016/j.ces.2007.06.007 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20090044510.1002/smll.200900445 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.03.00410.1016/j.tifs.2014.03.004 ↗
35. 10.1081/MA-12001485010.1081/MA-120014850 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.368246410.1063/1.3682464 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71389-X10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71389-X ↗
38. 10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/00910.1088/0957-4484/7/3/009 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20040071910.1002/adma.200400719 ↗
40. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/14/R0110.1088/0957-4484/17/14/R01 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12221-019-8262-z10.1007/s12221-019-8262-z ↗
42. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.03210.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.032 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0008310.1021/acs.macromol.8b00083 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.06810.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.068 ↗
45. 10.2115/fiber.66.3510.2115/fiber.66.35 ↗
46. Li S · J Appl Polym Sci · 2017 · 134 · 4485310.1002/app.44853 ↗
47. 10.1002/app.4710310.1002/app.47103 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.03010.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.030 ↗
49. 10.1002/mame.20130047410.1002/mame.201300474 ↗
50. 10.1122/8.000023410.1122/8.0000234 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.10964610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109646 ↗
52. 10.3390/polym1202046310.3390/polym12020463 ↗
53. 10.1002/pen.2537810.1002/pen.25378 ↗
54. 10.1081/MB-12001575010.1081/MB-120015750 ↗
55. 10.1002/APP.4275110.1002/APP.42751 ↗
56. 10.1007/s10924-021-02128-z10.1007/s10924-021-02128-z ↗
57. 10.1002/app.5045710.1002/app.50457 ↗
58. 10.1122/1.495344610.1122/1.4953446 ↗
59. 10.1080/15583724.2019.157218510.1080/15583724.2019.1572185 ↗
60. 10.1002/app.3883310.1002/app.38833 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11824310.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118243 ↗
62. 10.1039/C8RA08156E10.1039/C8RA08156E ↗
63. 10.1021/sc500049510.1021/sc5000495 ↗
64. 10.1002/jsfa.876910.1002/jsfa.8769 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.02410.1016/j.msec.2015.11.024 ↗
66. Elmer P. DSC 4000 Installation and hardware guide, 2018, https://resources.perkinelmer.com/lab-solutions/resources/docs/GDE_DSC_4000_Installation_and_Hardware_Guide_09931392C.pdf (accessed 2 October 2021).
67. 10.1002/app.2942510.1002/app.29425 ↗
68. 10.18689/ijmsr-100010310.18689/ijmsr-1000103 ↗
69. 10.1002/pi.159910.1002/pi.1599 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.01010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.010 ↗
71. 10.1002/app.2628810.1002/app.26288 ↗
72. 10.1002/polb.2404210.1002/polb.24042 ↗
73. 10.1002/macp.20040022510.1002/macp.200400225 ↗
74. 10.1002/app.4566010.1002/app.45660 ↗
75. 10.1007/BF0276359210.1007/BF02763592 ↗
76. 10.1063/1.486516810.1063/1.4865168 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.11510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.115 ↗
78. 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-045310.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-0453 ↗
79. 10.1201/978142005313510.1201/9781420053135 ↗
80. 10.1007/s11595-019-2037-710.1007/s11595-019-2037-7 ↗
81. 10.1007/s10965-009-9292-910.1007/s10965-009-9292-9 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.08.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2011.08.023 ↗
83. Fouad H · Int J Electrochem Sci · 2013 · 8 · 229310.1016/S1452-3981(23)14309-4 ↗
84. Promnil S · Mater Today Proc · 2021 · 47 · 2214
85. Tan EPS · 2015 · 262