Quick laboratory methodology for determining the particle filtration efficiency of face masks/respirators in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent crisis in the form of COVID-19 has rendered wearing of mask mandatory for patients, health care workers and members of public worldwide. This has caused a sudden shift of focus on availability, effectiveness, re-use and development of face masks/respirators. In the current pandemic situation, the shortage of masks has also led to rethinking on strategies of reuse of masks after due sterilization. This work discusses a quick laboratory methodology to test/determine the particle filtration efficiency of face masks/respirators. The testing parameters include the particle capture efficiency of the mask material/full mask, pressure drop and the fit factor. Two different, simple, make-shift set-ups have been adopted for the present context. The first is used to measure the intrinsic particle capture efficiency and pressure drop of the filter material and the second as a ‘full mask sampler’ to assess the leakages through seams and joints of the mask. Experiments conducted with atomized NaCl test particles on three types of mask viz. commercial N-95 respirator, surgical mask and cloth mask have been used for evolving the methodology. The differences in terms of capture efficiency of aerosol particles for the filter material and for the full mask in face fix/sealed fixture have been linked to improvement of the mask design in development phase. This paper hopes to provide a crucial laboratory link between the mask developers and the certification agencies in the times of urgency. Needless to mention that commercialization of the same is subject to certification from authorized agencies, following standard procedures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infection Control and Ventilation · COVID-19 and healthcare impacts · Noise Effects and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. worldmeters.info/coronavirus/countries (2020, accessed 15 November 2020).
2. 10.1111/irv.1208010.1111/irv.12080 ↗
3. 10.3201/eid2606.20023910.3201/eid2606.200239 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01253.x10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01253.x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.02410.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024 ↗
6. Paxton NC, Forrestal DP, Desselle M, et al. N95 respiratory masks for COVID-19: a review of the literature to inform local responses to global shortages, https://research.qut.edu.au/biofabrication/wpcontent/uploads/sites/62/2020/04/N95_COVID-19_LiteratureReview_2020_Submission.pdf (2020, accessed 7 November 2020).
7. 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.03410.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.034 ↗
8. 10.11622/smedj.201403710.11622/smedj.2014037 ↗
9. Office of Federal Register. Federal register: 42 code of federal regulations part 84. Respiratory protective devices. Final rules and notice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995, pp. 30335–30398.
10. 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.29310.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.293 ↗
11. World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and considerations during severe shortages: interim guidance, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331695 (2020, accessed 7 November 2020).
12. 10.4209/aaqr.2012.07.017910.4209/aaqr.2012.07.0179 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.09.01410.1016/j.jhin.2019.09.014 ↗
14. 10.1017/S095026880999165810.1017/S0950268809991658 ↗
15. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b9e8b310.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b9e8b3 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.040815910110.1073/pnas.0408159101 ↗
17. 10.1098/rsif.2010.068610.1098/rsif.2010.0686 ↗
18. 10.4209/aaqr.2013.06.020110.4209/aaqr.2013.06.0201 ↗
19. Rengasamy S · J Occup Environ Med · 2014 · 11 · 388
20. Grinshpun SA · J Occup Environ Med · 2009 · 6 · 593
21. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0325210.1021/acsnano.0c03252 ↗
22. Rengasamy S · Ann Occup Hyg · 2010 · 54 · 789
23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30520-110.1016/S0140-6736(20)30520-1 ↗
24. 10.1101/2020.04.19.2007177910.1101/2020.04.19.20071779 ↗
25. 10.1080/1529866839140427510.1080/15298668391404275 ↗
26. 10.1017/dmp.2013.4310.1017/dmp.2013.43 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.abb073610.1126/science.abb0736 ↗
28. 10.1177/152808372090946210.1177/1528083720909462 ↗
29. 10.1177/152808371985876010.1177/1528083719858760 ↗
30. Patanaik A · J App Poly Sci · 2010 · 117 · 132510.1002/app.30561 ↗
31. OSHA 29 CFR Parts 1910 and 1926 · 1998
32. Roberge R · Ann Occup Hyg · 2012 · 56 · 808
33. Clayton M · Ann Occup Hyg · 2005 · 49 · 545
34. 10.1136/oemed-2017-10476510.1136/oemed-2017-104765 ↗
35. Nie XQ · Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi · 2020 · 38 · 255
36. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.10492810.1016/j.microc.2020.104928 ↗
37. 10.1080/15459624.2020.173564010.1080/15459624.2020.1735640 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11051-012-1268-810.1007/s11051-012-1268-8 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.11692510.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116925 ↗
40. IS 16289:2014; reaffirmed 2019. Medical textiles- surgical face masks- specification.
41. BS EN 14683:2019. Medical face masks- requirements and test methods.
42. Adams WC. · 1993
43. Rengasamy S · J Occup Environ Med · 2014 · 14 · 92
44. ASTM F2100-11:2018. Standard specification for performance of materials used in medical face masks.
45. IS 9473:2002; reaffirmed 2019. Respiratory protective devices- filtering half masks to protect against particles-specification.
46. Skaria SD · Ann Occu Hyg · 2014 · 58 · 771
47. 10.1155/2018/509654010.1155/2018/5096540 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.00710.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007 ↗
49. Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, et al. Features, Evaluation, and Treatment of Coronavirus. [Updated 2020 Oct 4]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554776/