Research on military targets camouflage effect rating based on background anomaly detection and deep transfer features learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Manual evaluation of military target camouflage often fails to fully capture human visual characteristics. This paper introduces a method for intelligent camouflage feature extraction and effect evaluation using deep neural networks. Firstly, military target and background datasets are constructed, with annotation methods optimized through perceptual experiments. A GANomaly model for background anomaly detection and a transfer learning feature model are developed. These models evaluate data similarity to background and target features to categorize camouflage into three levels. PCA dimensionality reduction and RFE screening identify final features. Two logistic regression models are then combined to create a grading model. In experiments, the GANomaly model was trained and optimized, achieving 86.8% accuracy in distinguishing level 1 from non-level 1 camouflage using 28-dimensional features. Among three transfer models, the MobileNetV2 model identified 33-dimensional features with 85.1% accuracy in distinguishing level 3 from non-level 3 camouflage. Combined, the models reached an 84.3% grading accuracy on the test set, with Micro and Macro average AUC values of 0.939 and 0.945, respectively. This performance surpasses that of BP network models and linear models based on manual features, as well as metrics like SSIM, UIQI, MSE, and PSNR. The results indicate that the models effectively align with human annotations and can reliably assess military target camouflage levels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrared Target Detection Methodologies · Visual Attention and Saliency Detection · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Field Engineering College, Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing, China
Funding
key Project on Battlefield Visibility Control and Unidirectional Transmission technology
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1117/12.253275610.1117/12.2532756 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.05.00610.1016/j.dt.2020.05.006 ↗
3. 10.1111/jzo.1268210.1111/jzo.12682 ↗
4. 10.1093/beheco/arw08110.1093/beheco/arw081 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12304-018-9339-610.1007/s12304-018-9339-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.10339410.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103394 ↗
7. Jun Y · Acta Photonica Sin · 2021 · 50 · 196
8. 10.1007/s00530-014-0368-y10.1007/s00530-014-0368-y ↗
9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.307725810.1109/ACCESS.2021.3077258 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00530-021-00813-610.1007/s00530-021-00813-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.01310.1016/j.compind.2018.03.013 ↗
12. Chao-chao J · Command Control & Simulation · 2017 · 39 · 4
13. 10.3390/s2017467210.3390/s20174672 ↗
14. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.302580110.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025801 ↗
15. 10.1145/3364335.336439910.1145/3364335.3364399 ↗
16. Songlin Y · Protective Engineering · 2020 · 42 · 62
17. Jiaju Y · Semicond Optoelectron · 2019 · 3 · 5
18. Jia-Kun L · Laser & Infrared · 2019 · 49 · 6
19. Jin Y · Shipboard Electronic Countermeas Ure · 2009 · 32 · 3
20. 10.1109/ICIP.2017.829708310.1109/ICIP.2017.8297083 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.visres.2020.07.00810.1016/j.visres.2020.07.008 ↗
22. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.306444310.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064443 ↗
23. 10.1177/1548512922107743210.1177/15485129221077432 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11042-020-09002-510.1007/s11042-020-09002-5 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.08.00710.1016/j.dt.2020.08.007 ↗
26. 10.1137/12087178X10.1137/12087178X ↗
27. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.779510.5604/01.3001.0014.7795 ↗
28. Xiaofeng Z · Electron Opt Control · 2022 · 29 · 7
29. 10.1007/s11042-022-12287-310.1007/s11042-022-12287-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.11.0042214-914710.1016/j.dt.2020.11.0042214-9147 ↗
31. 10.1117/12.256618310.1117/12.2566183 ↗
32. Akcay S · Computer Vision - ACCV · 2018 · 2019 · 622
33. 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.1123110.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 ↗
34. 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp00683710.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 ↗
35. Zeiler MD · Computer Vision - ECCV · 2014 · 2014 · 818
36. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<965::AID-SIM509>3.0.CO;2-O10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<965::AID-SIM509>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
37. 10.1007/s42979-020-0109-610.1007/s42979-020-0109-6 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.29010.1016/j.procs.2020.03.290 ↗
39. Sandler M, Howard A, Zhu M, et al. MobileNetV2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In: 2018 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), June 2018, Salt Lake, 2018, pp. 4510–4520.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
40. Mu L · Journal of Harbin Engineering University · 2008 · 29 · 1002
41. 10.1007/s00586-006-0143-710.1007/s00586-006-0143-7 ↗
42. Lin CJ · Imag Sci J · 2013 · 62 · 1743131X13Y.000