Reinforcing fabrics as the mechanical support of ion exchange membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical, physical and electrochemical characteristics are one of the important properties of ion exchange membranes. These parameters are required for a next operation and for an application in an electrodialysis (as tightness of a stack, energy consumption, capacity of electrodialysis). The goal of this article is comparison of the influence of the different reinforcing fabric on the properties of ion exchange membranes. Six types of ion exchange membranes with the nonwoven fabric, the monofilament knit, the multifilament knit, the monofilament woven fabric, the multifilament woven fabric, and for comparison non-reinforcing ion exchange membranes were chosen. The most important properties of a fabric in this application are thickness, free area related to the warp and the weft, mechanical strength, the material (shrinkage), type of fabric (plain or twill weave, a knit, monofilament, multifilament) and of course price. Electrochemical, physical and mechanical properties of ion exchange membranes were studied. Non-reinforcing ion exchange membranes have lower mechanical strength, but the best elongation. These ion exchange membranes report big relative dimension changes after swelling in demineralized water and the lowest value of the areal resistance. The most appropriate ion exchange membrane is with woven fabric from monofilaments after comparison with other ion exchange membranes in terms of the quality of the lamination and other electrochemical, physical and mechanical parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane Separation Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MemBrain, Stráž pod Ralskem, Czech Republic
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Dubrovski PD (eds) Woven fabric engineering . 1st ed, India: Sciyo, 2010.
2. Saiman MP, Wahab MS and Wahit MU. The effect of fabric weave on tensile strength of woven kenaf reinforced unsaturated polyester composite. Int Colloquium Text Eng Fashion Apparel Des ICTEFAD , Penang, Malaysia, 2014, pp.25–29.10.1007/978-981-287-011-7_5 ↗
3. Crouch IG, Arnold L, Pierlot I, et al. Fibres, textiles and protective apparel. In: The science of armour materials . Sawston, Cambridge, UK; Waltham, MA, USA: Woodhead Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier, 2017, pp.269–330.10.1016/B978-0-08-100704-4.00006-2 ↗
4. Qin Y. A brief description of textile fibers. In: Medical textile materials . Elsevier, 2016, pp.23–42.10.1016/B978-0-08-100618-4.00003-0 ↗
5. Qin Y. A brief description of the manufacturing processes for medical textile materials. In: Medical textile materials . Sawston, Cambridge, UK; Waltham, MA, USA: Woodhead Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier, 2016, pp.43–54.10.1016/B978-0-08-100618-4.00004-2 ↗
6. Sinclair R. Understanding textile fibres and their properties. In: Textiles and fashion . Elsevier, 2015, pp.3–27.10.1016/B978-1-84569-931-4.00001-5 ↗
7. 10.5004/dwt.2010.102510.5004/dwt.2010.1025 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.03310.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.033 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.03310.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.033 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.07.01110.1016/j.seppur.2012.07.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.01710.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.017 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.03510.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.035 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.00610.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.11810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.118 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.desal.2017.02.00810.1016/j.desal.2017.02.008 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.00810.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cep.2016.03.01410.1016/j.cep.2016.03.014 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.03410.1016/j.desal.2014.03.034 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.03.03310.1016/j.seppur.2016.03.033 ↗
20. Herrada RA · J Hazard Mater · 2016 · 319 · 10210.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.076 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.08.01410.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.08.014 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.09510.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.095 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.05610.1016/j.rser.2017.03.056 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.07110.1016/j.solener.2017.01.071 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.01710.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.017 ↗
26. Keating JT, Baucom EI, Batman JM. Membrane reinforced with modified leno weave fabric . Patent 5384019-A, USA, 1995.
27. Watanabe IY, Yamakoshi Y, Miyauchi H, et al. Reinforced ion-exchange membrane . Patent 4072793-A, USA, 1978.
28. Maloouk RS, Branca PA and Perry RL. Fabric reinforced composite membrane . Patent 4954388-A, USA, 1990.
29. Křivčík J · Desal Wat Treat · 2014 · 56 · 1
30. Stránská E · Desal Wat Treat · 2015 · 56 · 322010.1080/19443994.2014.981413 ↗
31. Sefar: precision woven synthetic monofilament fabrics. Available at: http://techlist.sefar.com/cms/newtechlistpdf.nsf/vwWebPDFs/openmesh_EN.pdf/$FILE/openmesh_EN.pdf (accessed 13 June 2017).
32. Anadur S · 1995
33. Stránská E · 2015
34. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.04.02210.1016/j.memsci.2004.04.022 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00759-510.1016/S0378-7753(01)00759-5 ↗
36. 10.1016/S1383-5866(98)00069-010.1016/S1383-5866(98)00069-0 ↗
37. Sata T · 2004
38. 10.5004/dwt.2017.2059210.5004/dwt.2017.20592 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.06610.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.066 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cis.2005.09.00510.1016/j.cis.2005.09.005 ↗