journal article·2024-01Open access

Development of soft wearable robotic gloves to prevent muscle fatigue and enhance work efficiency

Soah Park, Dongun Lee, Hyunbin Won, Yumin Cho, Jeong Eun Yoon, Jungmin Kim, Dongjun Shin, Sumin Helen Koo

Abstract

This study aimed to develop wearable robotic gloves that can provide comfort to logistics and transportation workers while providing hand assistance and addressing accumulated muscle fatigue caused by repetitive manual handling tasks. Two types of gloves, rivet-type and pouch-type were developed and evaluated using the nine-hole peg test (NHPT) and grip strength tests. Results showed rivet-type gloves had better dexterity, with an 8.14% faster NHPT time, and maintained 85% grip strength compared to 80% for pouch-type gloves, even after fatigue exercises. Wearability tests were conducted by measuring clothing pressure and brainwaves. In contrast to the functional experimental results, the pouch-type gloves exhibited significant decreases in clothing pressure during actuation. According to the difference in brain waves in the frontal lobe region, the beta and gamma waves observed when wearing pouch-type gloves were lower than those of rivet-type gloves, and pouch-type gloves exhibited higher alpha-wave results than rivet-type gloves. These results imply that participants were in a comparatively relaxed state when wearing pouch-type gloves. A wearer’s evaluation survey on the overall design, function, comfort, safety, ease of use, usefulness, and use intention was conducted. In summary, the rivet-type gloves exhibited better results in hand performance while the pouch-type gloves showed advantages in wearability, suggesting a tradeoff relationship between force transmission and wearer comfort. The results of this study aimed to improve the work efficiency at logistics and transportation industry sites and help improve the welfare of workers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Robot Manipulation and Learning · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Clothing and Textiles, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Funding

Yonsei University Research Fund · National Research Foundation of Korea

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 2020
2. ISO 21420. Protective gloves — general requirements and test methods 2020.
3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Personal protective equipment 2023. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/osha3151.pdf (accessed 15 May 2024).
4. 10.1038/s41598-019-45722-x10.1038/s41598-019-45722-x ↗
5. Lee W · J Distrib Manag Res · 2020 · 23 · 98
6. 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.00910.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00017-710.1016/0003-6870(95)00017-7 ↗
8. Gutelius B · Report, UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education and Working Partnerships USA · 2019
9. 10.1111/j.1469-445X.1999.01895.x10.1111/j.1469-445X.1999.01895.x ↗
10. Yung M · 2016
11. 10.5143/JESK.2005.24.4.01510.5143/JESK.2005.24.4.015 ↗
12. 10.1177/205566832091813010.1177/2055668320918130 ↗
13. Neumann DA · 2016
14. 10.1017/wtc.2021.310.1017/wtc.2021.3 ↗
15. 10.2486/indhealth.MS123510.2486/indhealth.MS1235 ↗
16. Gerez L, Gorjup G, Zhou Y, et al. A hybrid, soft robotic exoskeleton glove with inflatable, telescopic structures and a shared control operation scheme. In: 2022 International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 23 May 2022 – 27 May 2022, 2022.10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9812426 ↗
17. 10.1109/LRA.2022.319363410.1109/LRA.2022.3193634 ↗
18. Tsabedze T, Hartman E, Abrego E, et al. TSA-BRAG: a twisted string actuator-powered biomimetic robotic assistive glove. 2020.10.1109/ISMR48331.2020.9312928 ↗
19. 10.1007/s41315-021-00198-910.1007/s41315-021-00198-9 ↗
20. Anke C · PLoS One · 2024 · 19 · e030671310.1371/journal.pone.0306713 ↗
21. 10.1177/1045389X1774272910.1177/1045389X17742729 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00005-810.1016/S0003-6870(99)00005-8 ↗
23. American Society for Testing and Materials · 2021
24. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13997 · ISO · 2023
25. OVAM. The Public Waste Agency of Flanders (OVAM) · OVAM · 2021
26. Yenici H · U.S. Patent No · 2016 · 9
27. Lee S · Korean Fash Text Res J · 2006 · 8 · 349
28. Korea Environmental Industry, Technology Institute. EL317. Eco-label certification standards – 120. Products subject to mandatory purchase in public procurement market cool-warm fabric for clothing.
29. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1359210.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13592 ↗
30. 10.1155/2020/272478310.1155/2020/2724783 ↗
31. 10.1016/0169-8141(94)90096-510.1016/0169-8141(94)90096-5 ↗
32. 10.1109/TOH.2019.292488110.1109/TOH.2019.2924881 ↗
33. 10.1088/1361-665X/aab7cc10.1088/1361-665X/aab7cc ↗
34. 10.37675/jap.2020.6.2.21910.37675/jap.2020.6.2.219 ↗
35. 10.3923/jas.2016.491.49510.3923/jas.2016.491.495 ↗
36. 10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.196310.1152/jn.1996.75.5.1963 ↗
37. 10.1145/1240624.124067410.1145/1240624.1240674 ↗
38. 10.1109/ISWC.1998.72953710.1109/ISWC.1998.729537 ↗
39. 10.1007/s12541-020-00383-z10.1007/s12541-020-00383-z ↗
40. Hasegawa Y, Tokita J, Kamibayashi K, et al. Evaluation of fingertip force accuracy in different support conditions of Exoskeleton. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Shanghai, China, 9-13 May 2011, 2011.10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980512 ↗
41. 10.2478/v10304-012-0032-610.2478/v10304-012-0032-6 ↗
42. 10.21086/ksles.2019.08.26.4.44510.21086/ksles.2019.08.26.4.445 ↗
43. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13934-2 · ISO · 2014
44. ASTM International. ASTM D2594/D2594M-21 · ASTM International · 2021
45. ASTM International. ASTM D3107-07 · ASTM International · 2019
46. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 13938-1:2019. Textiles — bursting properties of fabrics part 1: hydraulic method for determination of bursting strength and bursting distension.
47. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12947-2 · ISO · 2016
48. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9237 · ISO · 1995
49. Qi Y · 2023
50. Ansell. How to measure glove size 2021. https://www.ansell.com/us/en/blogs/safety-briefing/na/na_how-to-measure-glove-size#:∼:text=If-your-hand-measures-6.5,%2C-choose-size-10%2C-XL (accessed 19 July 2024).
51. 10.1177/030936461560539510.1177/0309364615605395 ↗
52. 10.1186/s12891-015-0612-410.1186/s12891-015-0612-4 ↗
53. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e23b10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e23b ↗
54. DHL express. Packaging, https://dhlexpress.ee/en/terms-and-conditions-2/packaging/ (accessed July 19, 2024).
55. Lopienski K. Understanding royal mail parcel and letter sizes: comprehensive guide for ecommerce 2024. https://www.shipbob.com/uk/blog/royal-mail-parcel-size/ (accessed 19 July 2024).
56. 10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.6.99310.5805/SFTI.2013.15.6.993 ↗
57. Cho HK · Textil Res J · 2008 · 10 · 473
58. 10.31152/JB.2022.11.7.4.4110.31152/JB.2022.11.7.4.41 ↗
59. 10.5535/arm.2020.44.2.13110.5535/arm.2020.44.2.131 ↗
60. Comparison of golf gloves price and quality 2021. https://www.sobo112.or.kr/news/news.php?ptype=view&idx=22134&page=&total_searcsear=%C0%E5%B0%A9 (accessed 17 May 2024).
61. 10.1002/aisy.20220017410.1002/aisy.202200174 ↗
62. 10.1109/TMECH.2022.314803210.1109/TMECH.2022.3148032 ↗
63. 10.1007/s41315-021-00198-910.1007/s41315-021-00198-9 ↗
64. 10.1109/TMECH.2022.317529810.1109/TMECH.2022.3175298 ↗
65. 10.1109/TMECH.2021.307293910.1109/TMECH.2021.3072939 ↗
66. 10.1093/gerona/56.9.M58410.1093/gerona/56.9.M584 ↗
67. 10.1371/journal.pone.017373010.1371/journal.pone.0173730 ↗
68. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.54894710.3389/fbioe.2020.548947 ↗
69. 10.1007/s11370-013-0135-510.1007/s11370-013-0135-5 ↗
70. Noritsugu T, Takaiwa M, Sasaki D. Power assist wear driven with pneumatic rubber artificial muscles. In: 2008 15th international conference on mechatronics and machine vision in practice, Auckland, New Zealand, 2-4 December 2008, 2008.10.1109/MMVIP.2008.4749589 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.01410.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014 ↗
72. ISO 1833-2:2020. Textiles — quantitative chemical analysis part 2: ternary fibre mixtures.