Parametric study of microporous nanofiber support and thin-film composite membranes for remediation of saline water
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, polyamide 6 (PA6) nanofiber-supported thin-film composite membranes have been studied for saline water remediation. Nanofiber-based support layers are critical in enhancing the membrane surface area and facilitating the formation of high-performance polyamide (PA) thin films. Herein, microporous nanofiber support membranes were fabricated using a lamination technique at varying temperatures, and the effects of lamination temperature on fiber diameter, pore size, and air permeability were investigated to optimize the support layer for PA thin-film membrane fabrication. Results indicate that increasing the lamination temperature from 110°C to 135°C decreases air permeability and pore size while increasing fiber diameter. Using the optimized support laminated at 110°C, ultrafiltration PA thin-film membranes were developed, and the effects of monomer type and feed pH on membrane performance were evaluated. M-phenylenediamine (MPD)-based membranes achieved a maximum salt rejection of 74% but exhibited a relatively low water flux of 0.42 L·m −2 ·h −1 at 400 kPa. In contrast, piperazine (PIP)-based membranes demonstrated a low sodium chloride (NaCl) rejection of 25% but a high magnesium sulfate (MgSO 4 ) rejection of 97% at the same benzenetricarbonyl trichloride (TMC) concentration, with a significantly higher flux of 8.6 L·m −2 ·h −1 . Acidic conditions improved the flux of MPD-based membranes up to 5-fold but significantly reduced salt rejection, whereas alkaline conditions enhanced salt rejection for PIP-based membranes while decreasing flux. This work is the first attempt in the literature to systematically investigate the influence of lamination temperature on nanofiber support for further PA thin-film membrane formation, providing new insights into optimizing support layer properties for desalination.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technical University of Liberec
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
University of Chemistry and Technology Prague
Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the CAS, Czech Republic
VSB-Technical University of Ostrava
Funding
Czech Science Foundation · Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic · European Union Under the REFRESH – Research Excellence for Region Sustainability and High-Tech Industries
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/jmse904035610.3390/jmse9040356 ↗
2. 10.2166/wrd.2023.06510.2166/wrd.2023.065 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.513803810.1063/1.5138038 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.desal.2021.11537710.1016/j.desal.2021.115377 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.02710.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.027 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.12783110.1016/j.biortech.2022.127831 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.11767110.1016/j.watres.2021.117671 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:102037942191710.1023/A:1020379421917 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.07610.1016/j.cej.2017.10.076 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13022010.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130220 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.08710.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.087 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12878010.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128780 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.desal.2019.07.00410.1016/j.desal.2019.07.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.desal.2021.11517010.1016/j.desal.2021.115170 ↗
15. 10.3390/membranes1104023710.3390/membranes11040237 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.11967210.1016/j.memsci.2021.119672 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11739610.1016/j.memsci.2019.117396 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.05210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.052 ↗
19. 10.1002/open.20180026710.1002/open.201800267 ↗
20. 10.3390/nano810077110.3390/nano8100771 ↗
21. 10.1177/1528083722112744310.1177/15280837221127443 ↗
22. 10.5004/dwt.2016.223010.5004/dwt.2016.2230 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.25910.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.259 ↗
24. 10.1155/2016/756597210.1155/2016/7565972 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11772810.1016/j.memsci.2019.117728 ↗
26. 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00025-910.1016/0376-7388(95)00025-9 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.01310.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.013 ↗
28. 10.3390/polym1406110210.3390/polym14061102 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.03210.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.032 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.01910.1016/j.desal.2012.07.019 ↗
31. 10.1177/174034991245082810.1177/1740349912450828 ↗
32. 10.1039/D0RA01077D10.1039/D0RA01077D ↗
33. 10.1080/10962247.2016.116222810.1080/10962247.2016.1162228 ↗
34. 10.1098/rsif.2009.037410.1098/rsif.2009.0374 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00250-010.1016/S0032-3861(00)00250-0 ↗
36. 10.3390/polym1304066210.3390/polym13040662 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12115510.1016/j.memsci.2022.121155 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.02.03410.1016/j.desal.2010.02.034 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.4791310.1002/app.47913 ↗
40. 10.3390/membranes1007013710.3390/membranes10070137 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.14110.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.141 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.04810.1016/j.desal.2011.07.048 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.02510.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.025 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.03510.1016/j.desal.2013.11.035 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12061810.1016/j.memsci.2022.120618 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14398210.1016/j.cej.2023.143982 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.memsci.2003.12.01010.1016/j.memsci.2003.12.010 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00109-X10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00109-X ↗
49. 10.1016/0376-7388(93)80014-O10.1016/0376-7388(93)80014-O ↗
50. 10.1039/D3RA04258H10.1039/D3RA04258H ↗
51. 10.1080/0022233810805676410.1080/00222338108056764 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12047710.1016/j.memsci.2022.120477 ↗
53. 10.3390/membranes1202015610.3390/membranes12020156 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.desal.2022.11557710.1016/j.desal.2022.115577 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11857210.1016/j.memsci.2020.118572 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.05210.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.052 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.03410.1016/j.desal.2016.02.034 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.desal.2022.11602710.1016/j.desal.2022.116027 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12445210.1016/j.cej.2020.124452 ↗
60. 10.1002/app.4885810.1002/app.48858 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.03910.1016/j.desal.2018.01.039 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.desal.2017.06.02910.1016/j.desal.2017.06.029 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.03310.1016/j.ces.2012.05.033 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.04310.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.043 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.00210.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.002 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11724410.1016/j.memsci.2019.117244 ↗
67. Yang Y. Tailoring selective layer structure for high performance nanofiltration membrane fabrication. Nanyang Technological University 2021, accessed 9 April 2025. https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/handle/10356/156872
68. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2018.08.00710.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2018.08.007 ↗
69. Azelee IW, Goh P, Lau W, et al. Development of thin film nanocomposite embedded with graphene oxide for MgSO4 removal. J Eng Sci Technol 2016; 11: 974–986.
70. 10.1016/j.desal.2023.11646310.1016/j.desal.2023.116463 ↗