Optimization of 3D woven preform for improved mechanical performance
Source abstract
Abstract
For structural design applications, through-thickness characteristics of reinforcement played a vital role, which is why 3D woven preforms are recommended for such applications. These characteristics are mainly dependent on the fiber and yarn positioning in reinforcement. Although research has been conducted for characterizing woven composites, special attention has not been made on weave pattern parameter which directly affects the mechanical performance of composites. In this research work, 3D orthogonal layer to layer and through thickness woven structures with different interlocking patterns have been thoroughly studied for their mechanical properties, thickness, air permeability and areal density. Natural fibers when used with biodegradable matrix find use in structural, as well as low to medium impact applications for automobiles. Jute yarn was used to produce four-layered 3D woven structures, as synthetic fibers will not give a biodegradable composite part. The focus of this study is to optimize weave pattern, which is robust in design, degradable preforms and easy to reproduce. The main objective of this research focused on the effectiveness of weaving patterns on physical and mechanical properties as well as to optimize the weave pattern for optimum performance. Grey relational analysis was used for the optimization of the robust weave pattern. The results showed that hybrid structures can be useful for improving the properties of the orthogonal layer to layer and through thickness woven structures. It was also noted that weft-way 3D woven structures can provide comparable mechanical properties with warp-way 3D woven structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile Engineering, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Balochistan, Pakistan
Weaving Department, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Funding
Higher Education Commission, Pakistan
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Delmonte J · 2013
2. 10.14429/dsj.64.732310.14429/dsj.64.7323 ↗
3. Su-Yuen H. Literature reviews on modeling internal geometry of textile composites and rate-independent continuum damage. NASA Technical Memo . Report no. 217079, March 2011.
4. Gürdal Z · 1999
5. Shan Z, Chen S, Zhang Q, et al. Three-dimensional woven forming technology and equipment. Journal of Composite Materials 2015; 18: 1–8.
6. Pelin GU. 3D Woven Fabrics, In: Han-Yong J (Ed.) Woven Fabrics , 2012, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/37492. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/woven-fabrics/3-d-woven-fabrics.
7. Anthonio M · 1999
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-9 ↗
10. Philippe B. Advances in Composites Manufacturing and Process Design, London: Woodhead Publishing, 2015, pp. 131–146.10.1016/B978-1-78242-307-2.00007-5 ↗
11. Beheraa BK · Indian J Fibre Text Res · 2008 · 33 · 274
12. Hearle JWS and Chen X. 3D woven preforms and properties for textile composites. In: International conference on composite materials , Edinburgh, UK, 27–31 July 2009.
13. Harris B · 1999
14. Safarabadi M. and Shokrieh MM. Understanding residual stresses in polymer matrix composites, In: Residual Stresses in Composite Materials , 2014, pp.197–232.10.1533/9780857098597.2.197 ↗
15. 10.1177/073168441037140510.1177/0731684410371405 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1000-9361(09)60188-610.1016/S1000-9361(09)60188-6 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199831244314110.1177/0021998312443141 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00101-410.1016/S1359-835X(01)00101-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.032 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.005 ↗
22. 10.1021/la104825u10.1021/la104825u ↗
23. Bilisik K · Adv Mod Woven Fabr Technol · 2011 · 1989 · 79
24. Stobbe D and Mohamed M. 3D woven composites: cost and performance viability in commercial applications. In: International sampe symposium and exhibition , 2003, California US: Long Beach, pp. 1372–1381.
25. Ko FK · Elsevier Sci Publ Text Struct Compos · 1989 · 129
26. Conway C. 3D reinforcement of composite materials. Italy: Polytechnic University of Milan, 2011. https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/37421.
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.03.012 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.010 ↗
30. 10.1177/004051751039247110.1177/0040517510392471 ↗
31. 10.1080/00405000.2012.67626710.1080/00405000.2012.676267 ↗
32. Islam MA. The damage suffered by the warp yarn during weaving, Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, 1987.
33. 10.5772/1653010.5772/16530 ↗
34. 10.1177/152808370404584710.1177/1528083704045847 ↗
35. Gupta MK · IJ Fib Text Res · 2013 · 45 · 619
36. 10.1007/s10853-013-7458-710.1007/s10853-013-7458-7 ↗
37. Car interiors go green, plastics, www.plastics.gl/automotive/car-interiors-go-green/ (accessed 30 October 2017).
38. 10.1007/s11837-006-0234-210.1007/s11837-006-0234-2 ↗
39. Sreekumar PA · Prop Perform Nat Compos · 2008 · 67
40. Jabbar M · J Text Inst · 2017 · 5000 · 1
41. 10.1515/aut-2015-000810.1515/aut-2015-0008 ↗
42. 10.1080/00405000.2014.94634110.1080/00405000.2014.946341 ↗
43. 10.1515/aut-2015-004610.1515/aut-2015-0046 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.00210.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.002 ↗
45. Julong D · J Grey Syst · 1989 · 1 · 1
46. 10.1016/j.btre.2014.06.00710.1016/j.btre.2014.06.007 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00108-310.1016/S0263-8223(02)00108-3 ↗