Failure analysis of conveyor belt samples under tensile load
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper is dedicated to investigating the properties of smooth conveyor belts through a tensile loading test, with the aim of examining the behavior of the inner structure of the belt samples. When the belt is subjected to a long-term strain, the belt relaxation effect is observed and changes may occur to the inner structure of the belt. The tensile test at constant velocity determines the load strength limit of the strip samples. The experiment has also shown the phenomenon of relaxation of the samples after the load. Metro-tomographic analysis is used to observe the behavior of the internal structure of the belt sample after the load. The obtained results indicate the initial damage of the inner structure of the conveyor belt occurred at the value of 2157 N. Under this load, the maximum damage size was 4.8 mm. This confirms the suitability of the method for tracking changes in the internal structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Mineral Processing and Grinding
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnology, Technical University of Kosice, Kosice, Slovak Republic
Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Technical University of Presov, Presov, Slovak Republic
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Kosice, Slovak Republic
Funding
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV · Kultúrna a Edukacná Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR · Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Pang Y and Lodewijks G. A novel embedded conductive detection system for intelligent conveyor belt monitoring. In: 2006 IEEE International conference on service operations and logistics, and informatics, SOLI 2006 . Shanghai, China: IEEE, 2006, pp.803–808.10.1109/SOLI.2006.235556 ↗
2. Naga K · Int J Adv Eng Technol E · 2013 · 2 · 43
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.12.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.12.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.10.01110.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.10.011 ↗
5. Vajsábel M · Int J Appl or Innov Eng Manage · 2016 · 5 · 174
6. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.01410.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.014 ↗
7. 10.1177/152808371456724210.1177/1528083714567242 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.02.03510.1016/j.measurement.2014.02.035 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.04510.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.045 ↗
10. Maton AE. Tubular pipe conveyor design: a review of cross section and belt selection. Bulk Solids Handl 2001; 21(2): 179–182.
11. Zamiralova ME, Van Keulen F and Lodewijks G. A new analytical approach to calculate the idler roll load distribution of a pipe conveyor. In: ICBMH 2013 – 11th international conference on bulk materials storage, handling and transportation . Newcastle: The University of Newcastle, pp.1–12.
12. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.01710.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.017 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.01610.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.016 ↗
14. Fedorko G · Bulk Solids Handl · 2015 · 35 · 44
15. 10.1016/j.wear.2014.06.02610.1016/j.wear.2014.06.026 ↗
16. Blazej R, Zimroz R, Jurdziak L, et al. Conveyor belt condition evaluation via non-destructive testing techniques. In: Mine planning and equipment selection . Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.1119–1126.10.1007/978-3-319-02678-7_109 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apt.2016.04.02610.1016/j.apt.2016.04.026 ↗
18. 10.1007/s13319-016-0085-810.1007/s13319-016-0085-8 ↗
19. Hu K, Guo Y-C and Wang P-Y. Simulation methods for conveyor belt based on virtual prototyping. In: 2010 International conference on mechanic automation and control engineering, MACE2010 Wuhan, China: IEEE, 2010, pp.2332–2334.10.1109/MACE.2010.5535538 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.49510.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.495 ↗
21. Schilling O, Westerwald M, Wiedenroth J, et al. ABAQUS FE analysis of a pipe conveyor using solids with embedded truss elements and shells with rebar layers. In: NAFEMS Seminar: ‘simulating composite materials and structures’ . Bad Kissingen, Germany, 2007, pp.1–10.
22. Webb C · 2013 · 25
23. Mazurkiewicz D · Arch Civ Mech Eng · 2010 · 1
24. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.012 ↗
25. 10.1080/17480930.2016.118796710.1080/17480930.2016.1187967 ↗
26. Gładysiewicz L, Król R, Kisielewski W, et al. Experimental determination of belt conveyors artificial friction coefficient. 2017; 22: 206–214.
27. Yan L · J Eng Des Technol · 2017 · 15 · 254
28. 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.03010.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.030 ↗
29. 10.1177/135065011562277810.1177/1350650115622778 ↗