journal article·2022-06Open access

Chitosan nanofibres and polypropylene meltblown substrate based multilayer respiratory filter for byssinosis prevention

Muhammd Tauseef Khawar, Hugh Gong, Qasim Zia, Hafiza Hifza Nawaz, Jiashen Li

Abstract

Byssinosis is a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease very common in textile cotton workers due to inhalation of fine cotton dust and gram negative bacteria. A three layer composite respiratory filter was developed for Byssinosis prevention by using the combination of polypropylene (PP) based meltblown layers and chitosan nanofibres (CSNF). Filtration efficiency against fine particulates ranges from 100 nm to 2.5 μm and anti-bacterial activity against Pantoea agglomerans were investigated. Chitosan nanofibres were produced by using the electrospinning process and were sandwiched between two PP layers to improve the overall surface area of the filter as well as providing a protective barrier against bacterial pathogens. The filter sample with just 2 hour’s CSNF coating showed more than 99% filtration efficiency with a low pressure drop of 71.6 Pa and a high quality factor value 0.082. The antibacterial performance of CSNF layers achieved up to 91% against the Pantoea agglomerans. Finally, results concluded that the developed respiratory filter can potentially reduce Byssinosis in textile workers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Department of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. U.S. National Library of Medicine · 2017
2. 10.1093/occmed/kqv01910.1093/occmed/kqv019 ↗
3. 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835cee9a10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835cee9a ↗
4. Rylander R · Br J Ind Med · 1978 · 35 · 204
5. Lara MA · 2018
6. Schilling RSF · Brit. J. Ind. Med · 1955 · 12 · 217
7. 10.4103/0970-2113.20131910.4103/0970-2113.201319 ↗
8. 10.1378/chest.79.4_Supplement.34S10.1378/chest.79.4_Supplement.34S ↗
9. 10.1111/ina.1292210.1111/ina.12922 ↗
10. 10.1177/152808371667681210.1177/1528083716676812 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cap.2005.07.01310.1016/j.cap.2005.07.013 ↗
12. 10.1007/978-3-642-54160-5__110.1007/978-3-642-54160-5__1 ↗
13. 10.3390/nano1106150110.3390/nano11061501 ↗
14. SterliTech · 2019
15. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.01210.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.012 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.10732810.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107328 ↗
17. 10.3390/molecules2204058510.3390/molecules22040585 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.01710.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.017 ↗
19. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.3410.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.34 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.03710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.037 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.11510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.115 ↗
22. 10.3390/ijms1711179010.3390/ijms17111790 ↗
23. 10.1088/1757-899X/254/10/10200610.1088/1757-899X/254/10/102006 ↗
24. 10.1177/004051751663131810.1177/0040517516631318 ↗
25. 10.1093/annhyg/men01910.1093/annhyg/men019 ↗
26. 10.1080/1545962080255819610.1080/15459620802558196 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.03410.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.034 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.00910.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.009 ↗
29. 10.3390/ijerph1602024710.3390/ijerph16020247 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ces.2012.07.03110.1016/j.ces.2012.07.031 ↗
31. 10.1177/089270571351329110.1177/0892705713513291 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.06.00310.1016/j.jtice.2015.06.003 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11534310.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115343 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.02210.1016/j.ces.2006.07.022 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.00910.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.05010.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.050 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.01710.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.017 ↗
38. Pleil JD · IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng · 2018 · 460 · 012013
39. 10.1016/j.bjp.2015.09.01010.1016/j.bjp.2015.09.010 ↗