Compression and recovery behavior of three-dimensional woven spacer composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Three-dimensional woven spacer composites have great potential for use in different parts of automobiles and construction application due to their better mechanical performance. In literature, time-dependent compression and recovery behavior of three-dimensional woven spacer composites was not studied. In this study, three-dimensional woven spacer composites (three thickness levels) were evaluated under static and dynamic (time-dependent) compression and recovery. The static compressive strength of composites was reduced with the increase in sample thickness. Also, the highest amount of energy was absorbed during the fracture of 4 mm (Comp4) thick composite, followed by 10 mm (Comp10) and 20 mm (Comp20) thick composites. Compressibility (%) and resiliency (%) was highest in Comp4 but recovery (%) was a bit lower as compared to the Comp10 and Comp20, while recovery (%) was highest in 10 mm thick composite as compared to the 4 mm and 20 mm thick samples. Moreover, higher value of permanent deformation in thickness with time was observed in Comp20 showing higher creep followed by Comp4 and Comp10. Furthermore, Comp4 showed the highest values of work done during cyclic compression loading–unloading testing, presenting highest toughness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Center for Composite Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Weaving Department, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10443-008-9072-410.1007/s10443-008-9072-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00087-910.1016/S0263-8223(02)00087-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.03210.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.032 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.021 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.02910.1016/j.msea.2006.09.029 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00033-210.1016/S0263-8223(01)00033-2 ↗
7. 10.1017/CBO978051157450410.1017/CBO9780511574504 ↗
8. 10.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L10.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L ↗
9. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00273-210.1016/S0266-3538(03)00273-2 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11340-006-7103-310.1007/s11340-006-7103-3 ↗
11. 10.1080/0040500900865872310.1080/00405009008658723 ↗
12. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-210.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-2 ↗
13. 10.1177/004051751039247110.1177/0040517510392471 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00093-210.1016/S0263-8223(98)00093-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00017-810.1016/S1359-835X(00)00017-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.056 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.08310.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.083 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.07.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2010.07.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00093-210.1016/S0263-8223(98)00093-2 ↗
20. 10.1177/004051751140212510.1177/0040517511402125 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mspro.2013.02.00210.1016/j.mspro.2013.02.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.07110.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.071 ↗
23. 10.1177/073168440810069710.1177/0731684408100697 ↗
24. 10.5604/01.3001.0010.171010.5604/01.3001.0010.1710 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-012-6252-210.1007/s10853-012-6252-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.03010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.030 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00118-410.1016/S0266-3538(00)00118-4 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00070-110.1016/S0266-3538(00)00070-1 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-910.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.10.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2003.10.013 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
32. Engel PA. Impact wear of materials, 1st Edition. New York: Elsevier, Second Impression, 1978, pp. 61–90.
33. 10.1038/nnano.2007.18610.1038/nnano.2007.186 ↗