An experimental study on the effect of nano-clay addition on mechanical and water absorption behaviour of jute fibre reinforced epoxy composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This study deals with the investigation of the mechanical and water absorption properties of jute fibre reinforced epoxy composites prepared by using hand layup method. The effects of fibre length (10, 20, 30 and 40 mm), fibre weight fraction (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25%), concentration of NaOH treatment (5% and 10%) and nano-clay addition (1, 3, 5 and 7 wt%) on the aforementioned properties were determined. Morphological characterisation was performed for the tensile and flexural fractured surface of the specimens to study their microstructural failures. The results revealed that the composites reinforced with 5% of NaOH-treated fibre and 5 wt% of nano-clay exhibited higher tensile, flexural and impact strengths of 103.05 MPa, 162.8 MPa and 0.358 kJ/mm 2 respectively, and lower water absorption rate. Moreover, the optimum fibre length and fibre weight fraction were found to be 30 mm and 20% respectively for better overall properties. These composites can be used for light and medium load applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, India
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, PSG Institute of Technology and Applied Research, Coimbatore, India
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.043 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.29810.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.298 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.00110.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.02510.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.025 ↗
5. 10.1177/152808371559158110.1177/1528083715591581 ↗
6. 10.1177/152808371663906310.1177/1528083716639063 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2012.04.001 ↗
8. Velusamy K · J Ind Text
9. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.22510.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.225 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.44810.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.448 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.02610.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.026 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.025 ↗
13. 10.1177/152808371772020310.1177/1528083717720203 ↗
14. 10.1080/15440478.2016.119308810.1080/15440478.2016.1193088 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.025 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.06.04610.1016/j.mspro.2015.06.046 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60406-710.1016/S1672-6529(16)60406-7 ↗
18. Govindhasamy K · Int J Emerg Technol Comput Sci Electron · 2016 · 21 · 521
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.06010.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.060 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.003 ↗
21. 10.1177/09673911160240070910.1177/096739111602400709 ↗
22. 10.1080/15440478.2017.130011510.1080/15440478.2017.1300115 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00170-017-0883-z10.1007/s00170-017-0883-z ↗
24. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.00610.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.09.02610.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.09.026 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.008 ↗
28. Rajeshkumar G · J Nat Fib · 2016 · 13 · 702
29. 10.1177/073168441348582610.1177/0731684413485826 ↗
30. 10.1177/073168440935335210.1177/0731684409353352 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.07810.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.078 ↗
32. 10.1177/002199831350358910.1177/0021998313503589 ↗
33. Siddika S · Int J Chem Mol Nucl Mater Metall Eng · 2013 · 7 · 60
34. 10.1177/073168441349532110.1177/0731684413495321 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.004 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.001 ↗