Optimization and physical performance evaluation of electrospun nanofibrous mats of PLA, PCL and their blends
Source abstract
Abstract
The optimization of process parameters such as applied voltage, orifice diameter, solvent system, and solvent ratio for electrospinning of neat polymers, polylactic acid (PLA) and poly (є-caprolactone) (PCL), to obtain uniform, randomly oriented nanofibers with minimum diameter variation and beaded structures has been critically discussed. The paper focuses on establishing a sequential optimization technique for arriving at a common set of electrospinning process parameters for individual polymers, such as, applied voltages, orifice diameters, solvent mixtures, solvent ratios, to be used in the fabrication of electrospun nanofibrous mats (ENMs) of blended polymers. In this study, the effect of variation of applied voltages, orifice diameters, solvent mixtures, solvent ratios, PLA/PCL blending ratios, solution concentration of blends and flow rate were reported via morphological analysis of electrospun nanofibers. The set of optimal process parameters obtained for both PLA and PCL were adopted for the fabrication of ENMs based on the PLA/PCL blends. The paper further deliberates on the physical performance of PLA/PCL based ENMs in acidic, basic and neutral release media. Thus, the study establishes a hierarchical processing optimization route for designing blended ENMs by following a set of variable electrospinning process parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, India
Funding
Indian Council of Medical Research
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.12.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.12.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.011 ↗
3. 10.1186/2055-7124-18-510.1186/2055-7124-18-5 ↗
4. 10.1021/nn101554u10.1021/nn101554u ↗
5. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.001 ↗
6. 10.1002/polb.2225910.1002/polb.22259 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma901004710.3390/ma9010047 ↗
8. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0032110.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00321 ↗
9. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0049510.3389/fchem.2019.00495 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.12.003 ↗
11. 10.3390/ijms1903074510.3390/ijms19030745 ↗
12. 10.3390/ma1107105910.3390/ma11071059 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.042 ↗
14. Abbasizadeh N · Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater
15. 10.2147/IJN.S16779310.2147/IJN.S167793 ↗
16. 10.1002/masy.20160004810.1002/masy.201600048 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma902007310.3390/ma9020073 ↗
18. 10.1002/masy.20180015310.1002/masy.201800153 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.69810.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.698 ↗
20. 10.1021/sc500344n10.1021/sc500344n ↗
21. 10.1021/ie202896910.1021/ie2028969 ↗
22. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.610.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.6 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00329005013610.1007/s003290050136 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.05110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.051 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.002 ↗
26. 10.5604/12303666.119660710.5604/12303666.1196607 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-X10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-X ↗
28. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.02810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.028 ↗
29. Jahangir MA · Am J Chem · 2017 · 7 · 177
30. 10.1007/s12221-019-8262-z10.1007/s12221-019-8262-z ↗
31. 10.3390/nano604007510.3390/nano6040075 ↗
32. 10.1155/2011/72415310.1155/2011/724153 ↗
33. 10.1002/app.3537210.1002/app.35372 ↗
34. 10.1002/polb.2404210.1002/polb.24042 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41598-017-00181-010.1038/s41598-017-00181-0 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.02210.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.022 ↗
37. 10.1002/app.3544810.1002/app.35448 ↗
38. 10.1002/app.3868310.1002/app.38683 ↗