Evaluation of cutting force of high-performance fibers’ dynamic cutting behaviour
Source abstract
Abstract
An analysis of fiber mechanics during cutting is conducted using a rotating cutting set up. It was found that high cutting speeds, low cutting angles, and high cutting normal forces lead to low values of cutting force. In this study, a set of high performance organic and inorganic fiber types are tested throughout different conditions of cut testing. Inorganic fibers gave the lowest specific cutting force. Values of cutting stresses on the edge of the blade were proved to be a function of fibers’ Young’s moduli. Higher Young’s moduli give lower cutting stresses on the blade edge while cutting fibers. Organic fibers were found to have a higher cutting resistance than carbon and glass fibers. A significant indirect correlation was found between the shear stress of the fibers and the fiber Young’s modulus. The value of the cutting force is significantly affected by both normal force and cutting velocity. The analysis of fiber mechanics during cutting is conducted using a rotating cutting set-up. It was found that high cutting speeds, low cutting angles, and high cutting normal forces lead to low values of cutting force. In this study, a set of high performance organic and inorganic fiber types are tested throughout different conditions of cut testing. Inorganic fibers gave the lowest specific cutting force. Values of cutting stresses on the edge of the blade were proved to be a function of fibers Young’s modulus. Higher Young’s modulus gives lower cutting stresses on the blade edge while cutting fibers. Organic fibers were found to have a higher cutting resistance than carbon and glass fibers. A significant indirect correlation was found between the shear stress of the fibers and the fibers Young’s modulus. The value of the cutting force is significantly affected by the normal force, cutting angle, and cutting velocity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Textile Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Egypt
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:100478030148910.1023/A:1004780301489 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1011128510.3390/ma10111285 ↗
3. 10.1201/978042905723610.1201/9780429057236 ↗
4. 10.1177/152808371455144110.1177/1528083714551441 ↗
5. 10.1080/0040500970865858810.1080/00405009708658588 ↗
6. Gopalakrishnan D. High performance textiles, fibre2fashion.com, www.fibre2fashion.com/industry-article/1261/high-performance-textiles (2007, accessed 31 October 2020).
7. 10.1007/s00170-015-6895-710.1007/s00170-015-6895-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/B978-1-4832-8370-8.50126-110.1016/B978-1-4832-8370-8.50126-1 ↗
9. 10.1533/978184569127110.1533/9781845691271 ↗
10. Hearle J. · 2001
11. 10.1007/s00170-015-7479-210.1007/s00170-015-7479-2 ↗
12. Van Dingenen J. Gel-spun high-performance polyethylene fibres. In: Hearle J (ed.) High-performance fibers . Woodhead Publishing Limited Series. Cambridge: The Textile Institute, 2001, pp. 63-92.10.1533/9781855737549.62 ↗
13. Beers D, Young R, et al. Other high modulus-high tenacity (HM-HT) fibres from linear polymers. In: Hearle J (ed.) High-performance fibers . Woodhead Publishing Limited Series. Cambridge: The Textile Institute, 2001, pp.93–155.10.1533/9781855737549.93 ↗
14. Rebouillat S, Steffenino B. High performance fibres and the mechanical attributes of cut resistant structures made therewith. WIT Trans Built Environ 2006; 85.10.2495/HPSM06028 ↗
15. Yarborough P, Nelson C. Performance of protective clothing, global needs and emerging markets . West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2005.10.1520/STP1462-EB ↗
16. Tejani N, Blocker R, Schiffelbein P, et al. Cut protection performance test for measuring cut resistance of materials used in protective clothing. In: Stull J and Schwope A (eds) Performance of protective clothing: sixth volume . West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 1997, pp.84–92.10.1520/STP19895S ↗
17. BS EN388. Protective gloves against mechanical risks. 1994.
18. 10.1177/004051750606733510.1177/0040517506067335 ↗
19. 10.1177/004051751989439310.1177/0040517519894393 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00065-510.1016/S0924-0136(99)00065-5 ↗
21. 10.1155/2011/46926210.1155/2011/469262 ↗
22. El Messiry M · Tex Res J · 2020
23. Naito K, Tanaka Y, Yang JM, et al. Tensile and flexural properties of single carbon fibres, www.researchgate.net/publication/288977854_Tensile_and_flexural_properties_of_single_carbon_fibres (accessed 24 October 2020).
24. 10.1177/155892501987929510.1177/1558925019879295 ↗
25. Yang H. · 1993
26. 10.1038/nmat311510.1038/nmat3115 ↗
27. El Messiry M, El-Tarfawy S. Slicing cuts on triaxial fabric using robotic-controlled razor blade. In: AUTEX2019 – 19th world textile conference on textiles at the crossroads , Ghent, Belgium, 11–15 June 2019.