Mechanical and thermal characterization of resin-infused cotton fabric/epoxy composites: Influence of woven construction parameters and surface treatments
Source abstract
Abstract
This study explores the mechanical and thermal characterization of epoxy-based composites reinforced with chemically modified woven cotton fabrics using the resin infusion technique. The woven fabrics construction parameters were varied in terms of weft yarn counts (16, 20, and 24 Tex) and pick densities as defined by pick wheel teeth (PWT) (30, 36, and 41 T). The fabrics were surface treated with 6% concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) using the alkali treatment method. The obtained results revealed that mechanical strength improved with decreasing weft yarn count and increasing PWT. Notably, chemically treated composites with the highest PWT exhibited superior strength compared to untreated counterparts, attributed to more compact microstructures, reduced fabric/fiber breakages, and enhanced interfacial bonding between the reinforced plain-woven cotton fabric and epoxy matrix. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that all composites have higher thermal stability above 300°C, with untreated fabric composites exhibiting the highest resistance to degradation, whereas the treated composite quickly degraded at an onset temperature of 288.4°C due to the removal of the hemicellulose, decomposition of the cellulose, and lignin content. In conclusion, the study indicates that surface treatment and woven construction parameters such as weft yarn counts and pick wheel teeth, as well as the resin infusion technique, significantly influence the mechanical, microstructural, and thermal properties of resin-infused woven cotton reinforced composites for potential application in industrial and automotive sectors, offering lightweight, durable solutions for components such as construction and building panels, doors, and roof panels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universiti Tenaga Nasional
Yaba College of Technology Yaba
Robert Gordon University
Ahmadu Bello University,
Universiti Teknologi MARA UiTM, Shah Alam
Universiti Teknologi MARA UiTM Shah Alam
Universiti Teknologi MARA UiTM
Funding
Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Wankhede B, Bisaria H, Ojha S, et al. A review on cotton fibre-reinforced polymer composites and their applications. J Mater: Des Appl 2023; 237(6): 1347–1362.
2. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10008210.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100082 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10712710.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107127 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2661910.1002/pc.26619 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2669010.1002/pc.26690 ↗
6. 10.1080/00405000.2019.161250210.1080/00405000.2019.1612502 ↗
7. 10.1080/00405000.2017.128520110.1080/00405000.2017.1285201 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.rinma.2022.10035510.1016/j.rinma.2022.100355 ↗
9. Achukwu EO, Ochika JO, Adole AE, et al. Tensile properties of alkali treated four-ply cotton woven fabrics for tarpaulin use. NSUK J Sci Technol 2015; 5(2): 69–72.
10. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11671210.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116712 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.10210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.102 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e0872410.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08724 ↗
13. 10.1177/1528083722112744110.1177/15280837221127441 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2726010.1002/pc.27260 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1317296410.3390/polym13172964 ↗
16. 10.1155/2012/35454710.1155/2012/354547 ↗
17. 10.14314/polimery.2019.2.210.14314/polimery.2019.2.2 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.07710.1016/j.jmrt.2019.12.077 ↗
19. Gupta MK, Gond RK, Bharti A. Effects of treatments on the properties of polyester-based hemp composite. Indian J Fiber Textil Res 2018; 43: 313–319.
20. Owen MM, Ogunleye CO, Achukwu EO. Mechanical properties of sisal fiber-reinforced epoxy composites-effect of alkali concentrations. Adv Polym Sci Technol 2015; 5(3): 26–31.
21. 10.1007/s12034-019-2018-710.1007/s12034-019-2018-7 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.00610.1016/j.cej.2017.03.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.31510.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.315 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.05510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.055 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.12010.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.120 ↗
27. Owen MM. The effects of alkali treatment on the mechanical properties of jute fabric reinforced epoxy composites. International Journal of fiber and textile research 2014; 4(2): 32–40.
28. 10.1080/00405000.2023.225804710.1080/00405000.2023.2258047 ↗
29. 10.1080/15440478.2022.211385010.1080/15440478.2022.2113850 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.009 ↗
31. Owen MM, Okotie GO, Achukwu EO, et al. Evaluation of tensile behavior of fancy woven fabrics based on different pick spacing and weave patterns. Nigerian Journal of Scientific Research 2016; 15(2): 405–409.
32. Achukwu EO, Dauda BM, Ishiaku US. Effects of fabric pattern on the mechanical properties of cotton fabric/unsaturated polyester composites. Curr J Appl Sci Technol 2015; 11(4): 1–11.
33. 10.3390/polym1303047110.3390/polym13030471 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11336610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113366 ↗
35. 10.1007/s00170-017-0565-x10.1007/s00170-017-0565-x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.01310.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.013 ↗
37. 10.1080/15440478.2020.173190310.1080/15440478.2020.1731903 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10853-021-06177-610.1007/s10853-021-06177-6 ↗
39. Achukwu EO, Dauda BM, Ishiaku US. Mechanical properties of plied cotton fabric-coated unsaturated polyester composites: effects of alkali treatments. Int J Compos Mater 2015; 5(4): 71–78.
40. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10276010.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102760 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.04710.1016/j.msea.2011.03.047 ↗
42. Hamdan A, Mustapha F, Ahmad KA, et al. The effect of customized woven and stacked layer orientation on tensile and flexural properties of woven kenaf fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Polym Sci 2016; 2016(1): 6514041.
43. 10.1016/j.csite.2021.10161210.1016/j.csite.2021.101612 ↗
44. 10.1080/15440478.2020.176192510.1080/15440478.2020.1761925 ↗
45. 10.3390/fib1009007410.3390/fib10090074 ↗
46. 10.1533/978184569781510.1533/9781845697815 ↗
47. 10.1080/15440478.2018.155815510.1080/15440478.2018.1558155 ↗
48. Ferdous N, Rahman MS, Kabir RB, et al. A comparative study on tensile strength of different weave structures. Int J Sci Res Eng Technol 2014; 3: 1307–1313.
49. 10.26420/advrestexteng.2017.101810.26420/advrestexteng.2017.1018 ↗
50. 10.1177/004051751560635410.1177/0040517515606354 ↗
51. 10.1177/155892501986752010.1177/1558925019867520 ↗
52. 10.1080/15440478.2019.169111310.1080/15440478.2019.1691113 ↗
53. 10.1080/15440478.2021.187537710.1080/15440478.2021.1875377 ↗
54. 10.1080/00405000.2016.124761610.1080/00405000.2016.1247616 ↗
55. 10.3390/polym1207157010.3390/polym12071570 ↗
56. 10.1080/00405000.2017.132081710.1080/00405000.2017.1320817 ↗
57. 10.1177/15589250140090010610.1177/155892501400900106 ↗
58. 10.1177/0040517521101068310.1177/00405175211010683 ↗
59. Giwa A, Achukwu EO, Shebe MW. Measurement of fabric drape using digital image processing. Afr J Nat Sci 2010; 13: 47–57.
60. Chu CK, Chen YL. Ballistic-proof effects of various woven constructions. Fib Text East Eur 2010; 18: 63–67.
61. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.10708110.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107081 ↗
62. 10.3390/polym1012132010.3390/polym10121320 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10730710.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107307 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.00810.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.008 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.010 ↗
66. 10.3390/polym1206131110.3390/polym12061311 ↗
67. 10.3390/polym1309139010.3390/polym13091390 ↗
68. 10.1007/s12221-021-0209-510.1007/s12221-021-0209-5 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.035 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.37110.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.371 ↗
71. 10.1080/15440478.2020.177666310.1080/15440478.2020.1776663 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10732610.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107326 ↗
73. 10.1080/00405000.2017.133371910.1080/00405000.2017.1333719 ↗
74. 10.1080/00405000.2012.72552110.1080/00405000.2012.725521 ↗
75. Abou Nassif GA. Effect of weave structure and weft density on the physical and mechanical properties of micro polyester woven fabrics. Life Sci J 2012; 9(3): 2–7.
76. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.06710.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.067 ↗
77. Owen MM, Orekoya EO, Dauda BM, et al. Effect of alkali treatment on the mechanical properties of woven cotton reinforced epoxy composites. Niger J Polym Sci Technol 2015; 10: 12–21.
78. 10.1177/073168440708587610.1177/0731684407085876 ↗
79. 10.1177/152808371664876410.1177/1528083716648764 ↗
80. 10.1106/VW5C-GN89-UXKR-WFKT10.1106/VW5C-GN89-UXKR-WFKT ↗
81. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.12964010.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129640 ↗