Physical, mechanical and thermal properties of Spanish broom (Spartium junceum L.) fibre reinforced unidirectional polyester composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This research analyses Spanish broom fibres (Spartium junceum L.) as possible reinforcement in polymer composites. It includes fibre extraction, characterisation, and composite construction. We extracted the Spanish broom fibres by water retting for 30 days, followed by hand washing and air drying. The fibres were spun into skeins using circular spinning. The fibres exhibited a density of 1.27 ± 0.03 g/cm 3 and an average diameter of 170 ± 1.80 μm. The SEM investigation revealed a rough, uneven surface with microfibrils and spaces, that are typical of lignocellulosic fibres. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin were detected using FTIR analysis. TGA revealed three weight-reduction phases, with the most significant cellulose degradation temperature around 319°C. XRD analysis revealed a 48.09% crystallinity index and 15.7 nm crystallite size. Single fibre tensile testing showed an elastic modulus of 20.51 ± 5.30 GPa, a fracture stress of 486.17 ± 129.16 MPa, and a fracture strain of 1.57 ± 0.43%. Spanish broom yarn and polyester resin were used to create unidirectional composites. Results indicate that both unreinforced polyester and SJL fibre-reinforced composites have enhanced mechanical characteristics, with maximum stress of 29.79 ± 0.79 MPa and Young’s modulus of 3.10 ± 0.25 GPa. This work highlights the significance of employing Spanish broom fibres as a green reinforcing material for polymer composites and suggests future research options.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Med BOUDIAF University
M’hamed BOUGARA University
UAE University
Funding
United Arab Emirates University
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4236/nr.2016.7301110.4236/nr.2016.73011 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.564.310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.564.3 ↗
3. 10.3390/jcs712050610.3390/jcs7120506 ↗
4. Angelini LG, Tavarini S, Foschi L. Spanish broom (Spartium junceum L.) as new fiber for biocomposites: the effect of crop age and microbial retting on fiber quality. In: Conference papers in science. Wiley Online Library, 2013. 274359.
5. Santulli C, Giampaoli G. Spanish broom fibres properties and extraction for application in composites: a review. J ASEP 2021; 14: 624–631.
6. 10.33765/thate.9.3.110.33765/thate.9.3.1 ↗
7. 10.3390/polym1702023510.3390/polym17020235 ↗
8. 10.1080/15440478.2011.57727710.1080/15440478.2011.577277 ↗
9. Cerchiara T, Gallucci M, Gattuso C, et al. Chemical composition, morphology and tensile properties of Spanish broom (Spartium junceum L.) fibres in comparison with flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Fibres Text East Eur. 2014; 22(2): 25–28.
10. 10.1038/s41598-020-79568-510.1038/s41598-020-79568-5 ↗
11. 10.5552/drind.2011.111210.5552/drind.2011.1112 ↗
12. Govorčin Bajsić E, Meheš M, Kratofil Krehula L, et al. Preparation and thermal properties of thermoplastic composites filled with Spartium junceum L. fibers. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Nanomaterials—Research & Application; Brno, Czech Republic. 18–20 October. 2023; 392–399.
13. 10.1177/004051751244752610.1177/0040517512447526 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.08.00410.1016/j.arabjc.2016.08.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00059-X10.1016/S0926-6690(99)00059-X ↗
16. Juradin S, Boko I. Possibility of cement composite reinforcement by Spanish broom fibres. Građevinar 2018; 70: 487–495.
17. 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.0019110.52711/0974-360X.2022.00191 ↗
18. 10.1080/00914037.2011.61733210.1080/00914037.2011.617332 ↗
19. Salim B, Sorya N. Effects of chemical treatments on the structural, mechanical and morphological properties of poly (vinyl chloride)/Spartium junceum fiber composites. Cellul Chem Technol Eff 2015; 49: 375–385.
20. Bischof S Kovačević Z. From weed to fabric. 2013.
21. Martin NAM. Contribution à l'étude de paramètres influençant les propriétés mécaniques de fibres élémentaires de lin: Corrélation avec les propriétés de matériaux composites. Université de Bretagne Sud 2014.
22. Standard A. D3039/D3039M–08. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International, 2008.
23. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.15910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.159 ↗
24. 10.1002/pol.1969.16007101210.1002/pol.1969.160071012 ↗
25. 10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y ↗
27. ASTM D. 3822/D 3822M-14: standard test method for tensile properties of single textile fibres. ASTM International, American Society for Testing …, 2014.
28. 10.1080/15440478.2020.183899910.1080/15440478.2020.1838999 ↗
29. 10.9734/CJAST/2017/3618910.9734/CJAST/2017/36189 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2046110.1002/pc.20461 ↗
31. Mouli KC, Pannirselvam N, Anitha V, et al. Strength studies on banana fibre concrete with metakaolin. Int J Civ Eng Technol 2019; 10: 684–689.
32. 10.1007/s10924-021-02147-w10.1007/s10924-021-02147-w ↗
33. Arul Marcel Moshi A, Ravindran D, Sundara Bharathi S, et al. Characterization of new natural cellulosic fibers–a comprehensive review. In: IOP Conference series: materials science and engineering. IOP Publishing, 2019, 012013.
34. 10.1002/app.4739210.1002/app.47392 ↗
35. 10.1080/15440478.2020.184310210.1080/15440478.2020.1843102 ↗
36. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab539510.1088/2053-1591/ab5395 ↗
37. 10.1080/15440478.2019.171065010.1080/15440478.2019.1710650 ↗
38. Akin DE. Chemistry of Plants IN Industrial applications of Natural fibres: Structure, Properties and Technical Applications. Book Chapter. 2010; 13–22.
39. 10.1177/00221554010490120610.1177/002215540104901206 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.05010.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.050 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.10.00410.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.10.004 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.022 ↗
43. 10.1177/073168441143465410.1177/0731684411434654 ↗
44. 10.1080/15440478.2020.186794210.1080/15440478.2020.1867942 ↗
45. 10.1080/15440478.2018.149249110.1080/15440478.2018.1492491 ↗
46. 10.1080/15440478.2019.161230810.1080/15440478.2019.1612308 ↗
47. 10.3390/polym1622311310.3390/polym16223113 ↗
48. 10.1007/978-3-319-46610-1_610.1007/978-3-319-46610-1_6 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jksues.2013.08.00210.1016/j.jksues.2013.08.002 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10570-020-03385-210.1007/s10570-020-03385-2 ↗
51. Bakri MB, Jayamani E, Hamdan S, et al. Fundamental study on the effect of alkaline treatment on natural fibers structures and behaviors. J Eng Appl Sci 2016; 11: 8759–8763.
52. 10.1007/s10570-023-05377-410.1007/s10570-023-05377-4 ↗
53. 10.15376/biores.4.2.626-63910.15376/biores.4.2.626-639 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.00410.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.004 ↗
55. 10.1002/app.4216010.1002/app.42160 ↗
56. 10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.1.4610.1515/hfsg.1998.52.1.46 ↗
57. 10.1007/s10570-019-02779-110.1007/s10570-019-02779-1 ↗
58. 10.1002/app.1046010.1002/app.10460 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.04110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.041 ↗
60. 10.1002/pc.2008310.1002/pc.20083 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2009.09.013 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.05210.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.052 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.00310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.05.003 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.tca.2005.10.01610.1016/j.tca.2005.10.016 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.23010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.230 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.13610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.136 ↗
67. 10.1080/1023666X.2016.116863610.1080/1023666X.2016.1168636 ↗
68. 10.1002/pc.2710010.1002/pc.27100 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.05610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.056 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.09410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.094 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.13410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.134 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11599610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115996 ↗