Advancements in metallic foams for high-performance applications: Energy absorption and lightweight materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Metallic foams are lightweight cellular materials with exceptional energy absorption capabilities. This study systematically analyzes aluminum, magnesium, and titanium foam systems through cross-comparative assessment of 133 studies, examining four manufacturing routes and their impact on performance. Energy absorption varies with composition: aluminum foams achieve 2.6–13 MJ/kg, steel composites reach 4.0–50 MJ/kg, while microsphere foams attain 55–70 MJ/kg. Hybrid bi-continuous interpenetrated porous composites (BIPC) demonstrate 130% higher energy absorption than constituent components through structural synergies. Open-cell architectures exhibit 70–95% porosity, enabling thermal management applications. Systematic cross-comparative analysis demonstrates that relative density (0.1–0.5), pore morphology, and reinforcement strategy govern specific energy absorption, plateau stress, and deformation stability. Manufacturing techniques including powder metallurgy, gas expansion, reactive foaming, and foam infiltration have improved structural control; however, uniform porosity, reproducibility, and scalability remain challenging. The review identifies critical gaps in standardized high-strain-rate characterization and cross-study comparability. Future research should focus on processing optimization, hybrid integration strategies, and unified performance evaluation frameworks to support broader adoption in automotive, aerospace, and defense applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Nanoporous metals and alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Khaled M (2023) Review: closed-cell metallic foams produced via powder metallurgy. Metals 13(5):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1305095910.3390/met13050959 ↗
2. Wheeler JO (2022) Synthesis of lightweight metallic foam and their applications in various engineering sectors. In Materials Horizons (p. 3). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7146-4_310.1007/978-981-19-7146-4_3 ↗
3. Nawaz A, Rani S (2023) Fabrication methods and property analysis of metal foams - a technical overview. Mater Sci Technol 39(9):1060–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2023.218606810.1080/02670836.2023.2186068 ↗
4. Károly D, Maróti JE, Lolbert-Szabó J, Kemény A, Orbulov IN (2022) Production of syntactic metal foams reinforced in the matrix material. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1246(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1246/1/01201410.1088/1757-899X/1246/1/012014 ↗
5. Husain F, Siddiquee AN, Khan RA (2022) Fabrication routes of aluminium metal foams: A review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 441. https://doi.org/10.46254/in02.2022044110.46254/in02.20220441 ↗
6. Salins SS, Kumar S, Shetty S, Sachidananda HK, Khan M (2024) Characterization of the aluminium-based metal foam properties for automotive applications. Arab J Sci Eng 49(11):15265–15279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09399-310.1007/s13369-024-09399-3 ↗
7. Linul E, Galațanu S-V, Marşavina L, Kováčik J (2024) Crushing behavior of closed-cell metallic foams: anisotropy and temperature effects. J Mater Res Technol 30:4055–4070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.03.18610.1016/j.jmrt.2024.03.186 ↗
8. Vogel R, Drebenstedt C, Szyniszewski S, Bittner F, Fras T, Blanc L (2020) Metal foams with ceramic inserts for security applications. In Cellular Materials (pp. 125–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42798-6_1310.1007/978-3-030-42798-6_13 ↗
9. Costanza G, Tata ME (2018) Parameters affecting energy absorption in metal foams. Mater Sci Forum 941:1552–1557. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/MSF.941.155210.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/MSF.941.1552 ↗
10. Menç B, Özçatalbaş Y (2024) Manufacturing and characterization of open-cell aluminum foam by powder metallurgy. Mater Sci Technol 40(17):1355–1365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267083624129126710.1177/02670836241291267 ↗
11. Hassan A, Alnaser IA (2024) A review of different manufacturing methods of metallic foams. ACS Omega 9(6):6388–6409. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c0861310.1021/acsomega.3c08613 ↗
12. Srivastava SK, Patle GT, Gupta S, Joshi TC, Rajak DK, Sanskrita SKJ, Mondal D, Srivastava AK (2023) Insight into classifications and manufacturing processes of metallic foams: a review. Proc Institution Mech Eng Part E: J Process Mech Eng 238(5):2418–2434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408923119055110.1177/09544089231190551 ↗
13. Madgule M, Cg S, Gc MP, L A, Singhal P, Pandit D, Malik V (2022) Influence of foaming agents on mechanical and microstructure characterization of AA6061 metal foams. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408922109753410.1177/09544089221097534 ↗
14. Pandey R, Singh P, Khanna M, Murtaza Q (2021) Metal foam manufacturing, mechanical properties and its designing aspects—A review. In Advances in Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering (pp. 735–746). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8542-5_6610.1007/978-981-15-8542-5_66 ↗
15. Tan KT (2021) Review on manufacturing of metal foams. ASM Sci J 15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.32802/ASMSCJ.2021.79410.32802/ASMSCJ.2021.794 ↗
16. Yang X, Yang X, Yang X, Yang X, Yang X (2024) Supramolecular metallic foams with ultrahigh specific strength and sustainable recyclability. Nat Commun 15(1):4805. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49091-610.1038/s41467-024-49091-6 ↗
17. Bassi S, Scafè M, Leoni E, Mingazzini C, Bhatia NJ, Rossi A (2021) Development of recyclable fibre metal laminates (FML), their mechanical characterization and FE modelling, aiming at structural application in aeronautics. MATEC Web of Conferences, 349, 01010. https://doi.org/10.1051/MATECCONF/20213490101010.1051/MATECCONF/202134901010 ↗
18. Lefebvre L-P, Banhart J, Dunand DC (2008) Metallic foams: functional properties. Adv Eng Mater 10(9):775–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20089002310.1002/ADEM.200890023 ↗
19. Ashby MF, Evans AG, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG, Delale F (2001) Metal foams: a design guide. Appl Mech Rev 54(6):B105–B106. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.142111910.1115/1.1421119 ↗
20. Degischer H-P, Kriszt B (2002) Handbook of cellular metals: Production, processing, applications. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/352760055810.1002/3527600558 ↗
21. Galatanu SV, Marsavina L, Kováčik J, Linul E (2024) Influence of density and loading speed on static and impact properties of closed-cell metallic foams. Eng Fail Anal 160:108297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10829710.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108297 ↗
22. Abouei Mehrizi V, Karbakhsh Ravari B (2019) Metallic foams, new generation of the environmental-friendly materials. J Environ Friendly Mater 3(2):33–39
23. Sangeetha M, Prakash S, Sridharraja KS, Muralimano J (2020) Development, testing and microstructural study of aluminum foam in automobile application. Int J Ambient Energy 43(1):2408–2414. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2020.172369010.1080/01430750.2020.1723690 ↗
24. Kumar A, Čep R, Maitra S, Salau AO, Zurek-Mortka M, Logesh K (2024) Analyzing the performance impact on metallic foams: a comprehensive overview. Mater Res Express 11(12):122001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad966c10.1088/2053-1591/ad966c ↗
25. Liu E, Bai Y, Li J, Hu Y, Hao H (2024) Preparation of bi-continuous interpenetrated AF/ZAlSi9Cu2Mg with excellent energy absorption capacity via in situ method. Mater Lett 357:135872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2024.13587210.1016/j.matlet.2024.135872 ↗
26. Li R, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Yan L, Jiang J, Liu C, Miao X, Kim D-H, Xu F (2024) Porous NiO/Ni foam composites for improved impedance match and electromagnetic wave absorption through a simple in-situ calcination process. J Magn Magn Mater 604:172259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.17225910.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172259 ↗
27. Galatanu SV, Linul E, Kováčik J, Marsavina L (2024) The anisotropy behavior of metallic foams under Charpy impact tests. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2692(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2692/1/01200510.1088/1742-6596/2692/1/012005 ↗
28. Ren J-W, Zhou Y, Qiang L, Gao W, Meng H, Zhao Z (2023) Enhancing impact resistance of metallic foam core sandwich constructions through encasing high-strength fibrous composites. Thin Walled Struct 194:111546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.11154610.1016/j.tws.2023.111546 ↗
29. Tang Q, He Q, Chen X (2023) Numerical simulation study on mesoscopic metallic foam core sandwich panels under hypervelocity impact. Thin Walled Struct 193:111440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.11144010.1016/j.tws.2023.111440 ↗
30. Smyrnaios E, Tegos C, Stergioudi F, Maliaris G, Michailidis N (2023) Insights into building a digital twin of closed-cell aluminum foam during impact loading: microstructural, experimental and finite element investigations. J Mater Res Technol 27:3607–3623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.09410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.094 ↗
31. Marx J, Portanova M, Rabiei A (2020) Performance of composite metal foam armors against various threat sizes. J Compos Sci 4(4):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCS404017610.3390/JCS4040176 ↗
32. Rabiei A, Lattimer BY, Bearinger E (2021) Recent advances in the analysis, measurement, and properties of composite metal foams. In Minerals, Metals and Materials Series (pp. 143–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65249-4_1310.1007/978-3-030-65249-4_13 ↗
33. Al-Mezrakchi R, Al-Ramthan A, Alam S (2020) Designing and modeling new generation of advanced hybrid composite sandwich structure armors for ballistic threats in defense applications. AIMS Mater Sci 7(5):608–626. https://doi.org/10.3934/MATERSCI.2020.5.60810.3934/MATERSCI.2020.5.608 ↗
34. Gaitanaros S, Kyriakides S (2015) On the effect of relative density on the crushing and energy absorption of open-cell foams under impact. Int J Impact Eng 82:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2015.03.01110.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2015.03.011 ↗
35. Kim J-H, Kim D, Lee M-G, Han HN (2016) Multiscale analysis of open-cell aluminum foam for impact energy absorption. J Mater Eng Perform 25(9):3977–3984. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11665-016-2187-010.1007/S11665-016-2187-0 ↗
36. Tan W, Zhang B, Chen S, Li Y (2021) Fabrication, properties, and applications of open-cell aluminum foams: a review. J Mater Sci Technol 62:11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMST.2020.05.03910.1016/J.JMST.2020.05.039 ↗
37. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Fan J, Xu X, Ma H (2018) Mesoscopic investigation of layered graded metallic foams under dynamic compaction. Adv Struct Eng 21(11):1735–1746. https://doi.org/10.1177/136943321876694110.1177/1369433218766941 ↗
38. Fang Q, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wu H, Gong Z (2015) Mesoscopic investigation of closed-cell aluminum foams on energy absorption capability under impact. Compos Struct 124:409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2015.01.00110.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2015.01.001 ↗
39. Xu P, Zhao N, Shi K, Ren H, Jing L (2023) Experiment and numerical study on the dynamic response of foam sandwich panels under near-field blast loading. Metals 13(10):1745. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1310174510.3390/met13101745 ↗
40. Ding Y, Wang S, Zheng Z, Yang L, Yu J (2023) Dynamic crushing of cellular materials: a unified framework of plastic shock wave models. Int J Solids Struct 282:112555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11255510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112555 ↗
41. Stanev L, Kolev M, Drenchev B, Drenchev L (2016) Open-cell metallic porous materials obtained through space holders—Part II: structure and properties. A review. J Manuf Sci Eng 139:050802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403444010.1115/1.4034440 ↗
42. Patel P, Bhingole PP, Makwana D (2018) Manufacturing, characterization and applications of lightweight metallic foams for structural applications: review. Mater Today Proc 5(9):20391–20402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.41410.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.414 ↗
43. Mudge A, Morsi K (2024) Fabrication of uniform and rounded closed-cell aluminum foams using novel foamable precursor particles (FPPs). Metals 14(1):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1401012010.3390/met14010120 ↗
44. Marx J, Rabiei A (2017) Overview of composite metal foams and their properties and performance. Adv Eng Mater 19(10):1600776. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20160077610.1002/ADEM.201600776 ↗
45. Sharma A, Ravindran S, Gupta A (2023) Fabrication and mechanical properties of tri-layer B₄C-reinforced Al-Zn functionally graded foam having higher energy absorption efficiency. Adv Eng Mater 25(7):2201734. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20220173410.1002/adem.202201734 ↗
46. Sun Y, Zhang Q, Li QM, Scarpa F (2016) In-plane compression behavior and energy absorption of hierarchical triangular lattice structures. Mater Des 100:280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2015.09.10910.1016/J.MATDES.2015.09.109 ↗
47. Jalilzadeh E, Rohani Nejad S, Khiabani A, Azarakhsh S (2024) Mechanical response of open-cell metal foams with single and multi-layer shell during uniaxial compression test. Adv Eng Mater 26(8):2301995. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20230199510.1002/adem.202301995 ↗
48. Rajak DK, Kumaraswamidhas LA, Das S, Kumaran SS (2016) Characterization and analysis of compression load behaviour of aluminium alloy foam under diverse strain rate. J Alloys Compd 656:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2015.09.25510.1016/J.JALLCOM.2015.09.255 ↗
49. Rajak DK, Mahajan NN, Linul E (2019) Crashworthiness performance and microstructural characteristics of foam-filled thin-walled tubes under diverse strain rate. J Alloys Compd 775:675–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2018.10.16010.1016/J.JALLCOM.2018.10.160 ↗
50. Rajak DK, Mahajan NN, Selvaraj SK (2020) Fabrication and experimental investigation on deformation behaviour of AlSi10Mg foam-filled mild steel tubes. Trans Indian Inst Met 73(4):1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12666-020-01879-Y10.1007/S12666-020-01879-Y ↗
51. Rajak DK, Gawande SA, Kumaraswamidhas LA (2018) Evaluation of mild steel hollow and foam filled circular tubes under axial loading. Adv Mater Lett 9(6):433–438. https://doi.org/10.5185/AMLETT.2018.204110.5185/AMLETT.2018.2041 ↗
52. Rajak DK, Das S (2015) Energy absorption capabilities of aluminium foam-filled square tubes. Adv Mater Lett 6(1):80–85. https://doi.org/10.5185/AMLETT.2015.560510.5185/AMLETT.2015.5605 ↗
53. Rajak DK, Gupta M (2020) Applications of metallic foams. In Metallic Foams: Fundamentals and Applications (pp. 27–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_210.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_2 ↗
54. Kumar S, Kumar S, Nagpal PK, Kumar V (2023) Development of the Al12SiCuFe alloy foam composites with ZrSiO₄ reinforcements at different foaming temperatures. Metals 13(4):685. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1304068510.3390/met13040685 ↗
55. Rajak DK, Gupta M (2020) Acoustic, damping, thermal and electrical properties of metal foams. In Metallic Foams: Fundamentals and Applications (pp. 133–158). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_610.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_6 ↗
56. Kim J, Ha T, Lee Y, Kang C (2024) Heat dissipation of open-cell-type aluminum foams manufactured by replication-casting process. Metals 14(2):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1402020610.3390/met14020206 ↗
57. Ferraris S, Santostefano A, De Marco F, Rossella F (2022) Co-casting of Al and Al-foams. Adv Eng Mater 24(8):2200116. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20220011610.1002/adem.202200116 ↗
58. Farahat AIZ, Taha MR, Elshaer RN (2023) Enhancement of quasi-static compression strength for aluminum closed cell foam blocks shielded by aluminum tubes. Sci Rep 13(1):7088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33750-710.1038/s41598-023-33750-7 ↗
59. Rajak DK, Gupta M (2020) Introduction to metallic foams. In Metallic Foams: Fundamentals and Applications (pp. 1–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_110.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_1 ↗
60. Rajak DK, Gupta M (2020) Yielding, fatigue, and creep response of metal foams. In Metallic Foams: Fundamentals and Applications (pp. 109–132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_510.1007/978-981-15-9069-6_5 ↗
61. Sharma V, Zivic F, Grujovic N, Babcsan N, Babcsan J (2022) Aluminium metal foam production methods, properties and applications—a review. Mater Today Proc 62:3199–3206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.13610.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.136 ↗
62. He S, Zhang Y, Dai G, Jiang J (2020) Preparation of density-graded aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng A 772:138658. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2019.13865810.1016/J.MSEA.2019.138658 ↗
63. Sharma A, Kanyadhan Vijayaraghavan SS, Gupta A, Kumar R (2022) B₄C-reinforced Al-Zn foams having superior energy absorption efficiency. Adv Eng Mater 24(11):2200810. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20220081010.1002/adem.202200810 ↗
64. Kumar A, Kumar S, Mukhopadhyay NK, Yadav A (2022) Application of metallic foam in vehicle structure: a review. Mater Today Proc 62:5199–5205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.20110.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.201 ↗
65. Rajak DK, Linul E (2021) Crushing response of composite metallic foams: density and high strain rate effects. J Alloy Compd 871:159614. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2021.15961410.1016/J.JALLCOM.2021.159614 ↗
66. Zhang B, Lin Y, Li S, Zhai D, Wu G (2016) Quasi-static and high strain rates compressive behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foams. Compos Part B Eng 98:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2016.05.03410.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2016.05.034 ↗
67. Manova D (2022) Comparison of energy absorption performance and mechanical response of metal fiber porous materials under two strain rates. Adv Eng Mater 24(12):2201465. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20220146510.1002/adem.202201465 ↗
68. Sebaey TA, Rajak DK, Mehboob H (2021) Internally stiffened foam-filled carbon fiber reinforced composite tubes under impact loading for energy absorption applications. Compos Struct 255:112910. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.11291010.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.112910 ↗
69. Shi S, Sun W, Zhang X, Ma Y (2022) Compressive property and energy absorption capacity of Mg-ceramic-Ni foams at various temperatures. Metals 12(4):689. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1204068910.3390/met12040689 ↗
70. Linul E, Pietras D, Sadowski T, Marsavina L, Rajak DK, Kovacik J (2021) Crashworthiness performance of lightweight composite metallic foams at high temperatures. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 149:106516. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2021.10651610.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2021.106516 ↗
71. Bi X, Xu Y (2018) Gas expansion molding method. Patent
72. García-Moreno F, Mukherjee M, Jimenez C, Banhart J (2015) Pressure-induced foaming of metals. JOM: J Minerals Met Mater Soc 67(5):1030–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11837-015-1331-X10.1007/S11837-015-1331-X ↗
73. Atwater MA, Atwater MA, Darling KA, Tschopp MA (2014) Towards reaching the theoretical limit of porosity in solid state metal foams: Intraparticle expansion as a primary and additive means to create porosity. Adv Eng Mater 16(2):190–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADEM.20130043110.1002/ADEM.201300431 ↗
74. Surace R, De Filippis LAC, Niini E, Ludovico AD, Orkas J (2009) Morphological investigation of foamed aluminum parts produced by melt gas injection. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2009:506024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/50602410.1155/2009/506024 ↗
75. Popoola OO, Jahn R, McCune RC (2000) Forming metal foam structures. U.S. Patent No. US6464933B1
76. Barragan De Los Rios GA, Salazar Martínez SA, Mendoza Fandiño E, Fernández-Morales P (2024) Numerical simulation of aluminum foams by space holder infiltration. International Journal of Metalcasting 18(4):3176–3189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-024-01287-810.1007/s40962-024-01287-8 ↗
77. Carranza JC, Casas BY, Figueroa IA, Carranza LE, Alfonso I (2023) Design, fabrication and operation of a device for manufacturing metal foams and composites by infiltration. Int J Metalcast 17(3):2179–2193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-023-00979-x10.1007/s40962-023-00979-x ↗
78. Niroumand B, Jazini Dorcheh A (2023) Influence of melt infiltration parameters on structural and mechanical properties of Al-4.3wt.%Cu-EP syntactic foam. Metals 13(8):1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1308134510.3390/met13081345 ↗
79. Sunar T, Cetin M (2018) An experimental study on boron carbide reinforced open cell aluminum foams produced via infiltration technique. Eng Technol Appl Sci Res 8(6):3672–3677. https://doi.org/10.48084/ETASR.241910.48084/ETASR.2419 ↗
80. Lias I, Azaiauddin AMM, Ismail MH, Mamat MAI (2016) Thermal conductivity and microstructure of aluminum foam tube produce (AFTP) using infiltration method with vacuum-gas. Imp J Interdiscip Res 2(12):1556–1560
81. Kobashi M, Kanetake N (2012) Self-propagating foaming process of Al-Ti reactive precursor for fabricating long scale porous materials. In 13th International Conference on Aluminum Alloys (ICAA 13) (pp. 989–994). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48761-8_14910.1007/978-3-319-48761-8_149 ↗
82. Nakatani Y, Naito H (1996) Manufacture of reactive injection foamed molded product. Japanese Patent No. JP-0137020
83. Li J, Graeter H, Meller M (2008) Side feeding of reactive additives to improve reactive foam extrusion. Eur Patent No EP 2103411:A1
84. Jarema C, Niebylski L (1971) Method of making metal foams by sequential expansion. U.S. Patent No. US3790365A
85. Singh DK (2024) Powder metallurgy. In Fundamentals of Manufacturing Engineering (pp. 483–506). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8767-2_2110.1007/978-981-99-8767-2_21 ↗
86. Eessaa AK, Elkady OA, El-Shamy AAM (2023) Powder metallurgy as a perfect technique for preparation of Cu-TiO₂ composite by identifying their microstructure and optical properties. Scientific Reports 13(1):8732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33999-y10.1038/s41598-023-33999-y ↗
87. Kantoríková E (2023) Dodatočné spracovanie spekaných materiálov [Additional processing of sintered materials]. Technológ 15(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.26552/tech.c.2023.1.110.26552/tech.c.2023.1.1 ↗
88. Choi S, Lee SH, Jung J-G, Lee S-J, Ahn TY, Choi Y, Son SB (2024) Investigation on the structural and mechanical properties of Al foam manufactured by spark plasma sintering and compression molding methods. Korean J Met Mater 62(7):533–543. https://doi.org/10.3365/kjmm.2024.62.7.53310.3365/kjmm.2024.62.7.533 ↗
89. Mohammed AA, Hussein HA (2024) Fabrication and evaluation of mechanical and tribological properties of Al-foam produced by powder metallurgy route. Key Eng Mater 977:25–33. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-bh7i4s10.4028/p-bh7i4s ↗
90. Neu TR, Heim K, Seeliger W, Kamm PH, García-Moreno F (2024) Aluminum foam sandwiches: a lighter future for car bodies. JOM: The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 76(5):2364–2375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06460-210.1007/s11837-024-06460-2 ↗
91. Rakesh M (2024) Numerical investigation on deformation behavior of aluminium foams with in situ composite particles. Mater Res Proc 44:27–35. https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644903094-610.21741/9781644903094-6 ↗
92. Donat MG, Pépin J-L (2022) Effect of Mg powder’s particle size on structure and mechanical properties of Ti foam synthesized by space holder technique. Materials 15(24):8863. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1524886310.3390/ma15248863 ↗
93. Hong K, Park H, Um T, Choe H (2020) Magnesium-based alloy foam. U.S. Patent No. US11913092B2
94. Agbedor S-O, Yang D, Cao J, Chen J, Saleh B, Chao Q, Wang L, Jiang J, Ma A (2021) Recent progress in porous Mg-based foam preparation approaches: effect of processing parameters on structure and mechanical property. J Iron Steel Res Int 28(12):1607–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42243-021-00671-610.1007/S42243-021-00671-6 ↗
95. Bhosale D, Devikar AR, Sasikumar S, Vinod Kumar GS (2021) Foaming Mg alloy and composite using MgCO₃ blowing agent. Metall Mater Trans B 52(2):1041–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11663-021-02066-010.1007/S11663-021-02066-0 ↗
96. Wang N, Wang J, Xia X, Zhao W (2019) Fabrication of closed-cell magnesium composite foam with fine and high roundness pore structure. Sci Res 7(4):86–92. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.SR.20190704.1210.11648/J.SR.20190704.12 ↗
97. Çıbıkçı KÇ, Yaman M (2024) Experimental investigation of compressive behavior and vibration properties of layered hybrid foam formed by aluminum foam/EPS-filled syntactic foam. J Mater Sci 59(13):5659–5680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09393-y10.1007/s10853-024-09393-y ↗
98. Abedin R, Konlan J, Feng X, Mensah P, Li G (2022) Hybrid shape memory polymer filled metallic foam composite: shape restoring, strain sensing, Joule heating, strengthening, and toughening. Smart Mater Struct 31(8):085028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ac7d7d10.1088/1361-665x/ac7d7d ↗
99. Sarrafan S (2023) Shape memory polymer-based multifunctional syntactic foams [Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University]. LSU Digital Commons. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.613610.31390/gradschool_dissertations.6136 ↗
100. Yao S, Chen Z, Xu P, Li Z, Zhao Z (2021) Experimental and numerical study on the energy absorption of polyurethane foam-filled metal/composite hybrid structures. Metals 11(1):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET1101011810.3390/MET11010118 ↗