Reprogramming endothelial tip cell fate via PI3K-VEGF signaling cascade: a multifunctional adhesive hydrogel for enhanced angiogenesis and infected wound healing
Source abstract
Abstract
Infected skin wounds represent a significant healthcare challenge, affecting millions of patients worldwide and imposing substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Traditional wound dressings and systemic antibiotics face critical limitations including lack of tissue adhesion in wet environments, increasing antibiotic resistance, and inability to promote tissue regeneration, resulting in suboptimal healing outcomes. In this research, we formulated an injectable composite hydrogel comprising dopamine-modified sodium alginate, chondroitin sulfate, and silk fibroin as the primary matrix, with magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles and human umbilical mesenchymal stem cells (hUMSCs)-derived exosomes (Exo) as functional components. The resultant ACS/MgO/Exo hydrogel exhibits effective tissue adhesion, superior hemostatic capability, mild-photothermal therapy (M-PTT)-mediated antibacterial activity, and enhanced angiogenesis. In vitro studies demonstrated that the hydrogel effectively reduced bleeding time, eliminated bacteria through M-PTT, and significantly enhanced endothelial tip cell activation, proliferation, motility, and vascularization through activation of the PI3K-AKT-NF-κB-VEGF signaling cascade. In vivo experiments with infected full-thickness defect model confirmed the composite hydrogel’s ability to accelerate wound closure, eliminate bacterial infection, enhance collagen deposition, and promote vascularization while simultaneously modulating the inflammatory response. This multifunctional hydrogel represents a promising therapeutic platform for complex infected wound management, addressing the critical clinical need for integrated solutions that simultaneously achieve adhesion, hemostasis, infection control, and tissue regeneration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Duane TM, Huston JM, Collom M, Beyer A, Parli S, Buckman S, Shapiro M, Mcdonald A, Diaz J, Tessier JM, Sanders J (2021) Surgical infection society 2020 updated guidelines on the management of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 22(4):383–399. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2020.43610.1089/sur.2020.436 ↗
2. Burillo A, Pulido-Pérez A, Bouza E (2024) Current challenges in acute bacterial skin infection management. Curr Opin Infect Dis 37(2):71–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/qco.000000000000098910.1097/qco.0000000000000989 ↗
3. Martin P, Nunan R (2015) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol 173(2):370–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.1395410.1111/bjd.13954 ↗
4. Uberoi A, Mccready-Vangi A, Grice EA (2024) The wound microbiota: microbial mechanisms of impaired wound healing and infection. J 22(8):507–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-024-01035-z10.1038/s41579-024-01035-z ↗
5. Markiewicz-Gospodarek A, Kozioł M, Tobiasz M, Baj J, Radzikowska-Büchner E, Przekora A (2022) Burn wound healing: clinical complications, medical care, treatment, and dressing types: the current state of knowledge for clinical practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1903133810.3390/ijerph19031338 ↗
6. Goh M, Du M, Peng WR, Saw PE, Chen Z (2024) Advancing burn wound treatment: exploring hydrogel as a transdermal drug delivery system. Drug Deliv 31(1):2300945. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2023.230094510.1080/10717544.2023.2300945 ↗
7. Guo Y, Song G, Sun M, Wang J, Wang Y (2020) Prevalence and therapies of antibiotic-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.0010710.3389/fcimb.2020.00107 ↗
8. Kuo CY, Lin TY, Yeh YC (2023) Hydrogel-based strategies for the management of osteomyelitis. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 9(4):1843–1861. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0105710.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01057 ↗
9. Chen Y, Wang X, Tao S, Wang Q, Ma PQ, Li ZB, Wu YL, Li DW (2023) Research advances in smart responsive-hydrogel dressings with potential clinical diabetic wound healing properties. Mil Med Res 10(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-023-00473-910.1186/s40779-023-00473-9 ↗
10. Yuan N, Shao K, Huang S, Chen C (2023) Chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid and other novel multifunctional hydrogel dressings for wound healing: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 240:124321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12432110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124321 ↗
11. Vivcharenko V, Trzaskowska M, Przekora A (2023) Wound dressing modifications for accelerated healing of infected wounds. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2408719310.3390/ijms24087193 ↗
12. Arabpour Z, Abedi F, Salehi M, Baharnoori SM, Soleimani M, Djalilian AR (2024) Hydrogel-based skin regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2504198210.3390/ijms25041982 ↗
13. Shan BH, Wu FG (2024) Hydrogel-Based Growth Factor Delivery Platforms: Strategies and Recent Advances [J]. Adv Mater 36(5):e2210707. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20221070710.1002/adma.202210707 ↗
14. Zheng A, Wang X, Xin X, Peng L, Su T, Cao L, Jiang X (2023) Promoting lacunar bone regeneration with an injectable hydrogel adaptive to the microenvironment. Bioact Mater 21:403–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.08.03110.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.08.031 ↗
15. Liao W, Duan X, Xie F, Zheng D, Yang P, Wang X, Hu Z (2023) 3D-bioprinted double-crosslinked angiogenic alginate/chondroitin sulfate patch for diabetic wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 236:123952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12395210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123952 ↗
16. Zhang FX, Liu P, Ding W, Meng QB, Su DH, Zhang QC, Lian RX, Yu BQ, Zhao MD, Dong J, Li YL, Jiang LB (2021) Injectable mussel-inspired highly adhesive hydrogel with exosomes for endogenous cell recruitment and cartilage defect regeneration. Biomaterials 278:121169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12116910.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121169 ↗
17. Zhu T, Cai G, Zhao W, Yao X, Zhang Y (2025) Effects of silk fibroin hydrogel degradation on the proliferation and chondrogenesis of encapsulated stem cells. Biomacromolecules 26(2):1305–1319. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.4c0167610.1021/acs.biomac.4c01676 ↗
18. Zong Q, Peng X, Ding Y, Wu H, Lu C, Ye J, Sun W, Zhang J, Zhai Y (2023) Multifunctional hydrogel wound dressing with rapid on-demand degradation property based on aliphatic polycarbonate and chitosan [J]. Int J Biol Macromol 244:125138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12513810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125138 ↗
19. Xiao L, Xie P, Ma J, Shi K, Dai Y, Pang M, Luo J, Tan Z, Ma Y, Wang X, Rong L, He L (2023) A bioinspired injectable, adhesive, and self-healing hydrogel with dual hybrid network for neural regeneration after spinal cord injury. Adv Mater 35(41):e2304896. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20230489610.1002/adma.202304896 ↗
20. Liu Z, Ding Y, Ding Y, Wang W, Mao Z, Yu L (2025) Gelatin-DOPA-knob/fibrinogen hydrogel inspired by fibrin polymerization and mussel adhesion for rapid and robust hemostatic sealing [J]. Biomaterials 317:123038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.12303810.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.123038 ↗
21. Chen X, Zhang H, Liang Y, Lu Y, Xie X, Tu J, Ba L, Zhang X, Liu H (2023) Inflammation-modulating antibacterial hydrogel sustained release asiaticoside for infection wound healing. Biomater Adv 147:213302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.21330210.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213302 ↗
22. Deepankumar K, Guo Q, Mohanram H, Lim J, Mu Y, Pervushin K, Yu J, Miserez A (2022) Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of the Green Mussel Adhesive Protein Pvfp-5 is Regulated by the Post-Translated Dopa Amino Acid [J]. Adv Mater 34(25):e2103828. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20210382810.1002/adma.202103828 ↗
23. Kang S, Baskaran R, Ozlu B, Davaa E, Kim JJ, Shim BS, Yang SG (2020) T(1)-positive Mn(2+)-doped multi-stimuli responsive poly(L-DOPA) nanoparticles for photothermal and photodynamic combination cancer therapy [j]. Biomedicines. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines810041710.3390/biomedicines8100417 ↗
24. Mantry S, Behera A, Pradhan S, Mohanty L, Kumari R, Singh A, Yadav MK (2024) Polysaccharide-based chondroitin sulfate macromolecule loaded hydrogel/scaffolds in wound healing- A comprehensive review on possibilities, research gaps, and safety assessment [J]. Int J Biol Macromol 279(Pt 3):135410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13541010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135410 ↗
25. Federle W, Labonte D (2019) Dynamic biological adhesion: mechanisms for controlling attachment during locomotion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 374(1784):20190199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.019910.1098/rstb.2019.0199 ↗
26. Dompé M, Cedano-Serrano FJ, Heckert O, Van Den Heuvel N, Van Der Gucht J, Tran Y, Hourdet D, Creton C, Kamperman M (2019) Thermoresponsive Complex Coacervate-Based Underwater Adhesive [J]. Adv Mater 31(21):e1808179. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180817910.1002/adma.201808179 ↗
27. Mazurek Ł, Szudzik M, Rybka M, Konop M (2022) Silk fibroin biomaterials and their beneficial role in skin wound healing. Biomolecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom1212185210.3390/biom12121852 ↗
28. Sun W, Gregory DA, Tomeh MA, Zhao X (2021) Silk fibroin as a functional biomaterial for tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2203149910.3390/ijms22031499 ↗
29. Pan X, Li R, Li W, Sun W, Yan Y, Xiang X, Fang J, Liao Y, Xie C, Wang X, Cai Y, Yao X, Ouyang H (2024) Silk fibroin hydrogel adhesive enables sealed-tight reconstruction of meniscus tears. Nat Commun 15(1):2651. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47029-610.1038/s41467-024-47029-6 ↗
30. Mao Z, Bi X, Yu C, Chen L, Shen J, Huang Y, Wu Z, Qi H, Guan J, Shu X, Yu B, Zheng Y (2024) Mechanically robust and personalized silk fibroin-magnesium composite scaffolds with water-responsive shape-memory for irregular bone regeneration [J]. Nat Commun 15(1):4160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48417-810.1038/s41467-024-48417-8 ↗
31. Chen M, Qiao Y, Yu L, Wang W, Wang W, Sun H, Xu Y, Bai J, Zhou J, Geng D (2025) A microenvironment responsive polyetheretherketone implant with antibacterial and osteoimmunomodulatory properties facilitates osseointegration. Bioact Mater 43:273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.09.01710.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.09.017 ↗
32. Agah S, Sutton A, Velander WH, Bajaj SP (2008) Role of Mg2+ in extrinsic and intrinsic coagulation under physiologic conditions. Blood 112(11):2024. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V112.11.2024.202410.1182/blood.V112.11.2024.2024 ↗
33. Yaghoubi Y, Movassaghpour A, Zamani M, Talebi M, Mehdizadeh A, Yousefi M (2019) Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived-exosomes in diseases treatment [J]. Life Sci 233:116733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.11673310.1016/j.lfs.2019.116733 ↗
34. Jo H, Brito S, Kwak BM, Park S, Lee MG, Bin BH (2021) Applications of mesenchymal stem cells in skin regeneration and rejuvenation. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2205241010.3390/ijms22052410 ↗
35. Yang S, Huang S, Feng C, Fu X (2012) Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells: strategies, challenges, and potential for cutaneous regeneration. Front Med 6(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-012-0175-910.1007/s11684-012-0175-9 ↗
36. Li L, Li J, Guan H, Oishi H, Takahashi S, Zhang C (2023) Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in diabetes mellitus and its complications: applications and research advances. Int J Med Sci 20(11):1492–1507. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.8747210.7150/ijms.87472 ↗
37. Yang R, Zhou S, Huang J, Kang D, Chen Y, Wang X, Shi Y, Wang Z (2024) The role of Q10 engineering mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in inhibiting ferroptosis for diabetic wound healing. Burns Trauma 12:tkae054. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae05410.1093/burnst/tkae054 ↗
38. Hu WJ, Wei H, Cai LL, Xu YH, Du R, Zhou Q, Zhu XL, Li YF (2024) Magnetic targeting enhances the neuroprotective function of human mesenchymal stem cell-derived iron oxide exosomes by delivering miR-1228-5p. J Nanobiotechnology 22(1):665. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02941-310.1186/s12951-024-02941-3 ↗
39. Han X, Saengow C, Ju L, Ren W, Ewoldt RH, Irudayaraj J (2024) Exosome-coated oxygen nanobubble-laden hydrogel augments intracellular delivery of exosomes for enhanced wound healing. Nat Commun 15(1):3435. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47696-510.1038/s41467-024-47696-5 ↗
40. Liu X, Wu C, Zhang Y, Chen S, Ding J, Chen Z, Wu K, Wu X, Zhou T, Zeng M, Wei D, Sun J, Fan H, Zhou L (2023) Hyaluronan-based hydrogel integrating exosomes for traumatic brain injury repair by promoting angiogenesis and neurogenesis. Carbohydr Polym 306:120578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12057810.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120578 ↗
41. Song Y, You Y, Xu X, Lu J, Huang X, Zhang J, Zhu L, Hu J, Wu X, Xu X, Tan W, Du Y (2023) Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes biopotentiated extracellular matrix hydrogels accelerate diabetic wound healing and skin regeneration. Adv Sci 10(30):e2304023. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20230402310.1002/advs.202304023 ↗
42. Li W, Wu S, Ren L, Feng B, Chen Z, Li Z, Cheng B, Xia J (2023) Development of an antiswelling hydrogel system incorporating M2-exosomes and photothermal effect for diabetic wound healing [J]. ACS Nano 17(21):22106–22120. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c0922010.1021/acsnano.3c09220 ↗
43. Pan S, Yin Z, Shi C, Xiu H, Wu G, Heng Y, Zhu Z, Zhang J, Gui J, Yu Z, Liang B (2024) Multifunctional Injectable Hydrogel Microparticles Loaded with miR-29a Abundant BMSCs Derived Exosomes Enhanced Bone Regeneration by Regulating Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis [J]. Small 20(16):e2306721. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20230672110.1002/smll.202306721 ↗
44. Zou CY, Lei XX, Hu JJ, Jiang YL, Li QJ, Song YT, Zhang QY, Li-Ling J, Xie HQ (2022) Multi-crosslinking hydrogels with robust bio-adhesion and pro-coagulant activity for first-aid hemostasis and infected wound healing. Bioact Mater 16:388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.03410.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.034 ↗
45. Deng T, Lu W, Zhao X, Wang H, Zheng Y, Zheng A, Shen Z (2024) Chondroitin sulfate/silk fibroin hydrogel incorporating graphene oxide quantum dots with photothermal-effect promotes type H vessel-related wound healing [J]. Carbohydr Polym 334:121972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.12197210.1016/j.carbpol.2024.121972 ↗
46. Guo J, Fang W, Wang F (2023) Injectable fillers: current status, physicochemical properties, function mechanism, and perspectives. RSC Adv 13(34):23841–23858. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra04321e10.1039/d3ra04321e ↗
47. Mehdizadeh M, Weng H, Gyawali D, Tang L, Yang J (2012) Injectable citrate-based mussel-inspired tissue bioadhesives with high wet strength for sutureless wound closure. Biomaterials 33(32):7972–7983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.055 ↗
48. Zhou Y, Nie W, Zhao J, Yuan X (2013) Rapidly in situ forming adhesive hydrogel based on a PEG-maleimide modified polypeptide through Michael addition [J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24(10):2277–2286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4987-110.1007/s10856-013-4987-1 ↗
49. Fan S, Lin W, Huang Y, Xia J, Xu JF, Zhang J, Pi J (2022) Advances and potentials of polydopamine nanosystem in photothermal-based antibacterial infection therapies. Front Pharmacol 13:829712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.82971210.3389/fphar.2022.829712 ↗
50. Chen Y, Gao Y, Chen Y, Liu L, Mo A, Peng Q (2020) Nanomaterials-based photothermal therapy and its potentials in antibacterial treatment. J Control Release 328:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.05510.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.055 ↗
51. He L, Di D, Chu X, Liu X, Wang Z, Lu J, Wang S, Zhao Q (2023) Photothermal antibacterial materials to promote wound healing. J Control Release 363:180–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.09.03510.1016/j.jconrel.2023.09.035 ↗
52. Bhattacharya P, Dey A, Neogi S (2021) An insight into the mechanism of antibacterial activity by magnesium oxide nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B 9(26):5329–5339. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb00875g10.1039/d1tb00875g ↗
53. Nguyen NT, Grelling N, Wetteland CL, Rosario R, Liu H (2018) Antimicrobial activities and mechanisms of magnesium oxide nanoparticles (nMgO) against pathogenic bacteria, yeasts, and biofilms [J]. Sci Rep 8(1):16260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34567-510.1038/s41598-018-34567-5 ↗
54. Curry JM, Eubank TD, Roberts RD, Wang Y, Pore N, Maity A, Marsh CB (2008) M-CSF signals through the MAPK/ERK pathway via Sp1 to induce VEGF production and induces angiogenesis in vivo [J]. PLoS ONE 3(10):e3405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.000340510.1371/journal.pone.0003405 ↗
55. Mavria G, Vercoulen Y, Yeo M, Paterson H, Karasarides M, Marais R, Bird D, Marshall CJ (2006) Erk-mapk signaling opposes Rho-kinase to promote endothelial cell survival and sprouting during angiogenesis. Cancer Cell 9(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2005.12.02110.1016/j.ccr.2005.12.021 ↗
56. Xue C, Xie J, Zhao D, Lin S, Zhou T, Shi S, Shao X, Lin Y, Zhu B, Cai X (2017) The JAK/STAT3 signalling pathway regulated angiogenesis in an endothelial cell/adipose-derived stromal cell co-culture, 3D gel model. Cell Prolif. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.1230710.1111/cpr.12307 ↗
57. Zhang L, Li R, Wu BH, Liang TT, Liu Z, Ju W, Wang Y, Wen YT, Liu MC, Du JH (2022) Leptin activates the JAK/STAT pathway to promote angiogenesis in RF/6A cells in vitro [J]. Int J Ophthalmol 15(4): 554–9 https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2022.04.0510.18240/ijo.2022.04.05 ↗
58. Siekmann AF, Lawson ND (2007) Notch signalling and the regulation of angiogenesis [J]. Cell Adh Migr 1(2):104–106. https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.1.2.448810.4161/cam.1.2.4488 ↗
59. Ramasamy SK, Kusumbe AP, Wang L, Adams RH (2014) Endothelial notch activity promotes angiogenesis and osteogenesis in bone [J]. Nature 507(7492):376–380. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1314610.1038/nature13146 ↗