journal article·2025-10Open access

Scalable, durable, and malleable PVMDMS@PVP aerogel catalyst for CO2 capture and successive gas-phase cycloaddition reaction

Kyung Hoon Min, Byeongseok Kim, Kyoung Tae Park, Kyeongseok Min, Haryeong Choi, Hyung-Ho Park, Yongjin Lee, Sung-Hyeon Baeck, Sang Eun Shim, Yingjie Qian

Abstract

A structurally robust PVMDMS@PVP aerogel catalyst was developed by incorporating polyethyleneimine (PEI) and an ionic liquid, followed by Zn 2+ impregnation, for integrated carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) capture and catalytic conversion. The solvent-resistant framework maintains high CO 2 adsorption capacity and structural integrity across 50 thermal cycles over a broad temperature range (0–130 °C). Breakthrough experiments confirm excellent CO 2 /N 2 selectivity (5078) under mixed-gas flow at 100 °C. Zn 2+ -functionalized aerogels enable gas-phase cycloaddition of CO 2 with epoxides, achieving > 99% selectivity for propylene carbonate over 1978 h of continuous operation. Notably, the carbonate product was directly applied as an electrolyte in lithium-ion batteries, validating its electrochemical utility. The aerogel preserved its pore structure, catalytic activity, and monolithic form even after scale-up, demonstrating superior mechanical and chemical durability. This work presents a scalable, multifunctional aerogel catalyst platform that combines long-term stability, high CO 2 adsorption efficiency, and battery-relevant carbonate production for advanced CO 2 capture and utilization technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Luderer G et al (2018) Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2°C pathways. Nat Clim Change 8:626–63310.1038/s41558-018-0198-6 ↗
2. Hepburn C et al (2019) The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 575:87–9710.1038/s41586-019-1681-6 ↗
3. Bistline J et al (2023) Emissions and energy impacts of the inflation reduction act. Science 380:1324–132710.1126/science.adg3781 ↗
4. Prado A, Mac Dowell N (2023) The cost of permanent carbon dioxide removal. Joule 7:700–71210.1016/j.joule.2023.03.006 ↗
5. Bui M et al (2018) Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ Sci 11:1062–117610.1039/C7EE02342A ↗
6. Kazlou T, Cherp A, Jewell J (2024) Feasible deployment of carbon capture and storage and the requirements of climate targets. Nat Clim Change 14:1047–105510.1038/s41558-024-02104-0 ↗
7. Aleluia Reis L et al (2023) Research and development investment strategy to achieve the Paris climate agreement. Nat Commun 14:358110.1038/s41467-023-38620-4 ↗
8. Siegelman RL et al (2019) Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions. Energy Environ Sci 12:2161–217310.1039/C9EE00505F ↗
9. Gür TM (2022) Carbon dioxide emissions, capture, storage and utilization: review of materials, processes and technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 89:10096510.1016/j.pecs.2021.100965 ↗
10. Sievert K, Schmidt TS, Steffen B (2024) Considering technology characteristics to project future costs of direct air capture. Joule 8:979–99910.1016/j.joule.2024.02.005 ↗
11. Ochedi FO et al (2021) Carbon dioxide capture using liquid absorption methods: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:77–10910.1007/s10311-020-01093-8 ↗
12. Siegelman RL, Kim EJ, Long JR (2021) Porous materials for carbon dioxide separations. Nat Mater 20:1060–107210.1038/s41563-021-01054-8 ↗
13. Pardakhti M et al (2019) Trends in solid adsorbent materials development for CO2 capture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:34533–3455910.1021/acsami.9b08487 ↗
14. Zhang Z et al (2022) Emerging trends in sustainable CO2-management materials. Adv Mater 34:220154710.1002/adma.202201547 ↗
15. Li WL, Shuai Q, Yu J (2024) Recent advances of carbon capture in metal-organic frameworks: a comprehensive review. Small 20:240278310.1002/smll.202402783 ↗
16. Mandal C et al (2019) Experimental deconvolution of depressurization from capillary shrinkage during drying of silica wet-gels with SCF CO2 why aerogels shrink? J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 92:662–68010.1007/s10971-019-05124-x ↗
17. Cui B et al (2024) Aerogel-based carbon capture materials: research progress and application prospects. Sep Purif Technol 128794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.12879410.1016/j.seppur.2024.128794 ↗
18. Gonthier J, Scoppola E, Rilling T, Gurlo A, Fratzl P, Wagermaier W (2024) Solvent cavitation during ambient pressure drying of silica aerogels. Langmuir 40:1910.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00497 ↗
19. Gonthier J, Scoppola E, Gurlo A et al (2024) Plastic deformation and heat-enabled structural recovery of monolithic silica aerogels. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 111:1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-024-06494-710.1007/s10971-024-06494-7 ↗
20. Jones CW (2023) Recent developments in CO2 capture and conversion. JACS Au 3:1536–153810.1021/jacsau.3c00304 ↗
21. Asrafali SP, Periyasamy T, Bari GAKM (2025) Advances in carbon-based aerogels for CO2 capture: fundamental design strategies and technological progress. Gels 11:36110.3390/gels11050361 ↗
22. Emmanuel O, Rozina R, Ezeji TC (2025) Advances in carbon dioxide capture and conversion technologies: industrial integration for sustainable chemical production. Nat X Sustain 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2025.10010810.1016/j.nxsust.2025.100108 ↗
23. Li J, Yue C, Ji W, Feng B, Wang M-Y, Ma X (2023) Recent advances in cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides: halogen-free catalysis and mechanistic insights. Front Chem Sci Eng 17:1879–189410.1007/s11705-023-2354-4 ↗
24. Sun H, Sun S, Liu T, Zeng J, Wang Y, Yan Z, Wu C (2024) Integrated CO2 capture and utilization: selection, matching, and interactions between adsorption and catalytic sites. ACS Catal 14(20):12987–1300810.1021/acscatal.4c03861 ↗
25. Mishra V, Peter SC (2024) A comprehensive overview of the catalytic pathway for CO2 utilization with epoxide to cyclic carbonate. Chem Catal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2023.10079610.1016/j.checat.2023.100796 ↗
26. Choi S et al (2013) Synthesis of silica-coated graphite by enolization of polyvinylpyrrolidone and its thermal and electrical conductivity in polymer composites. Carbon 60:254–26510.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.034 ↗
27. Sun L, Gao M, Tang S (2021) Porous amino acid-functionalized poly(ionic liquid) foamed with supercritical CO2 and its application in CO2 adsorption. Chem Eng J 412:12876410.1016/j.cej.2021.128764 ↗
28. Zick ME et al (2022) Carbon dioxide capture at nucleophilic hydroxide sites in oxidation-resistant cyclodextrin-based metal-organic frameworks. Angew Chem 134:e20220671810.1002/ange.202206718 ↗
29. Hu Y et al (2023) New-generation anion-pillared metal–organic frameworks with customized cages for highly efficient CO2 capture. Adv Funct Mater 33:221391510.1002/adfm.202213915 ↗
30. Evans HA et al (2022) Aluminum formate, Al(HCOO)3: an earth-abundant, scalable, and highly selective material for CO2 capture. Sci Adv 8:eade147310.1126/sciadv.ade1473 ↗
31. Kim EJ et al (2020) Cooperative carbon capture and steam regeneration with tetraamine-appended metal–organic frameworks. Science 369:392–39610.1126/science.abb3976 ↗
32. Lin J-B et al (2021) A scalable metal-organic framework as a durable physisorbent for carbon dioxide capture. Science 374:1464–146910.1126/science.abi7281 ↗
33. Choi HJ et al (2021) The origin of selective adsorption of CO2 on merlinoite zeolites. Angew Chem Int Ed 60:4307–431410.1002/anie.202012953 ↗
34. Li Qi et al (2019) Space-confined synthesis of ZIF-67 nanoparticles in hollow carbon nanospheres for CO2 adsorption. Small 15:180487410.1002/smll.201804874 ↗
35. Liu M et al (2024) Capture and in-situ conversion of low-concentration CO2 over robust poly(ionic liquid)@porous carbon nanocomposites under green, co-catalyst- and solvent-free conditions. Chem Eng J 500:15709910.1016/j.cej.2024.157099 ↗
36. Ullah H et al (2025) Solvent free ambient pressure CO2 cycloaddition catalyzed by cobalt-impregnated 2D-nanofibrous COFs. ChemSusChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20240104610.1002/cssc.202401046 ↗
37. Ema T et al (2014) Bifunctional porphyrin catalysts for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and CO2: structural optimization and mechanistic study. J Am Chem Soc 136:15270–1527910.1021/ja507665a ↗
38. Zhou Z et al (2015) Metal–organic polymers containing discrete single-walled nanotube as a heterogeneous catalyst for the cycloaddition of carbon dioxide to epoxides. J Am Chem Soc 137:15066–1506910.1021/jacs.5b07925 ↗
39. Chen H et al (2022) Nanoporous {Y2}-organic frameworks for excellent catalytic performance on the cycloaddition reaction of epoxides with CO2 and deacetalization–knoevenagel condensation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:18589–1859910.1021/acsami.2c02929 ↗
40. Zhou W et al (2020) Enhanced carbon dioxide conversion at ambient conditions via a pore enrichment effect. Nat Commun 11:448110.1038/s41467-020-18154-9 ↗
41. Zhang X et al (2024) Nanoporous {Co3}-organic framework for efficiently seperating gases and catalyzing cycloaddition of epoxides with CO2 and knoevenagel condensation. J Colloid Interface Sci 656:127–13610.1016/j.jcis.2023.11.064 ↗
42. Li C et al (2023) Robust fluorine-functionalized {Ln5}-organic frameworks for excellent catalytic performance on cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides and knoevenagel condensation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:35052–3506110.1021/acsami.3c06804 ↗
43. Li F et al (2024) Hydrazino-containing Zr-MOF for enhanced Lewis acid-base catalysis of CO2 fixation into cyclocarbonate. J Environ Chem Eng 12:11431110.1016/j.jece.2024.114311 ↗
44. Sandru M et al (2022) An integrated materials approach to ultrapermeable and ultraselective CO2 polymer membranes. Science 376:90–9410.1126/science.abj9351 ↗
45. Zheng W et al (2023) Mesopore engineering of ZIF-8 by [Bmim][Tf2N] positioning into nanocage for enhanced CO2 capture. Chem Eng Sci 280:11899810.1016/j.ces.2023.118998 ↗
46. He R et al (2019) Porous graphene oxide/porous organic polymer hybrid nanosheets functionalized mixed matrix membrane for efficient CO2 capture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:4338–434410.1021/acsami.8b17599 ↗
47. Chen D et al (2023) Process parametric investigation of graphene-oxide-embedded composite membranes for boosting CO2/N2 separation. Energy Fuels 37:11187–1119610.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c01927 ↗
48. Liu J et al (2019) Highly polar but amorphous polymers with robust membrane CO2/N2 separation performance. Joule 3:1881–189410.1016/j.joule.2019.07.003 ↗
49. Zhou F et al (2017) Ultrathin graphene oxide-based hollow fiber membranes with brush-like CO2-philic agent for highly efficient CO2 capture. Nat Commun 8:210710.1038/s41467-017-02318-1 ↗
50. Cao J et al (2019) Ordered porous poly(ionic liquid) crystallines: spacing confined ionic surface enhancing selective CO2 capture and fixation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:6031–604110.1021/acsami.8b19420 ↗
51. Qiao Z et al (2019) Metal-induced ordered microporous polymers for fabricating large-area gas separation membranes. Nat Mater 18:163–16810.1038/s41563-018-0221-3 ↗
52. Li J-R et al (2013) porous materials with pre-designed single-molecule traps for CO2 selective adsorption. Nat Commun 4:153810.1038/ncomms2552 ↗
53. Fan S-T et al (2021) Ultrahigh carbon dioxide-selective composite membrane containing a γ-CD-MOF layer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:13034–1304310.1021/acsami.0c18861 ↗
54. Ramli NA, Hashim NA, Aroua MK (2020) Supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs) as a contactor for selective absorption of CO2/O2 by aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA). Sep Purif Technol 230:11584910.1016/j.seppur.2019.115849 ↗
55. Zhou Z et al (2021) A plant leaf-mimetic membrane with controllable gas permeation for efficient preservation of perishable products. ACS Nano 15:8742–875210.1021/acsnano.1c00997 ↗