Multi-factor analysis on thermal conductive property of metal-polymer composite microstructure heat exchanger
Source abstract
Abstract
With the rapid development of highly integrated electronic systems, microstructure heat exchangers have attracted more and more attentions according to their advantage of space saving, which can be utilized for the thermal dissipation in high power consumption systems with space limitation. As an important part of microstructure heat exchangers, the research on metal-polymer composite heat exchangers are still not systemic enough. Herein, the influences of several factors, including surface roughness, heating power, structural type of junction surface, thermal conductivity, and installation direction, on thermal conductive properties (e.g., thermal resistance, thermal dissipation performance) of metal-polymer composite microstructure heat exchangers are studied systematically based on the thermodynamic theory. The microstructure heat exchangers provide same thermal dissipation performance using only one-fifth spatial volume of the conventional heat exchangers. Both numerical and experimental methods are performed in this study, and the results are in good agreement. The metal-polymer composite microstructure heat exchangers could become good substitutes of conventional ones attributed to their smaller space requirement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Heat Transfer and Optimization · Thermal properties of materials · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Chang L et al (2010) Small-volume solution current-time behavior study for application in reverse iontophoresis-based non-invasive blood glucose monitoring. Sci China Chem 54(1):223–23010.1007/s11426-010-4130-9 ↗
2. Sun J et al (2018) Highly stretchable and ultrathin nanopaper composites for epidermal strain sensors. Nanotechnology 29(35):35530410.1088/1361-6528/aacc59 ↗
3. Sun J et al (2018) Nanofiller reinforced biodegradable PLA/PHA composites: current status and future trends. Polymers 10(5):50510.3390/polym10050505 ↗
4. Zhang D et al (2020) Overview of ultrasonic assisted manufacturing multifunctional carbon nanotube nanopaper based polymer nanocomposites. Engineered Science10.30919/es5e1002 ↗
5. Kormakov S et al (2018) A mathematical model for predicting conductivity of polymer composites with a forced assembly network obtained by SCFNA method. Polym Compos 40(5):1819–182710.1002/pc.24942 ↗
6. Harris C et al (2002) Fabrication, modeling, and testing of micro-cross-flow heat exchangers. J Microelectromech Syst 11(6):726–73510.1109/JMEMS.2002.806025 ↗
7. Wang S et al (2020) Optimal analysis for thermal conductivity variation of EVA/SCF composites prepared by spatial confining forced network assembly. Mater Today Commun 25:10120610.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101206 ↗
8. Liu H et al (2019) Application of biodegradable and biocompatible nanocomposites in electronics: current status and future directions. Nanomaterials 9(7):95010.3390/nano9070950 ↗
9. Sun J et al (2017) Thermal dissipation performance of metal-polymer composite heat exchanger with V-shape microgrooves: a numerical and experimental study. Appl Therm Eng 121:492–50010.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.104 ↗
10. Zhuang J et al (2016) Influence of factors on heat dissipation performance of composite metal–polymer heat exchanger with rectangular microstructure. Appl Therm Eng 102:1473–148010.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.007 ↗
11. Si W et al (2020) Enhancing thermal conductivity via conductive network conversion from high to low thermal dissipation in polydimethylsiloxane composites. J Mater Chem C 8(10):3463–347510.1039/C9TC06968B ↗
12. Sun, J et al (2018) Biomimetic moth-eye nanofabrication: enhanced antireflection with superior self-cleaning characteristic. Sci Rep 2018. 8(1)10.1038/s41598-018-23771-y ↗
13. Oleksiienko SV, Novomlynets OO, Yushchenko SM (2016) Diffusion bonding technique concerning production of microchannel heat exchangers. p 57–6010.1109/ELNANO.2016.7493009 ↗
14. Huang Y et al (2019) Conductive polymer composites from renewable resources: an overview of preparation, properties, and applications. Polymers 11(2):18710.3390/polym11020187 ↗
15. Yovanovich MM (2005) Four decades of research on thermal contact, gap, and joint resistance in microelectronics. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 28(2):182–20610.1109/TCAPT.2005.848483 ↗
16. Prasher RS, Matayabas JC (2004) Thermal contact resistance of cured gel polymeric thermal interface material. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 27(4):702–70910.1109/TCAPT.2004.838883 ↗
17. Camilleri R, McCulloch MD, Howey DA (2014) Experimental investigation of the thermal contact resistance in shrink fit assemblies with relevance to electrical machines. p 0444–044410.1049/cp.2014.0472 ↗
18. Admasu BT, Luo X (2013) Effects of thermal contact resistance and thomson heating on the outputs of solar thermoelectric power generation system. p 1260–1263
19. Sun H, Qian C (2013) Study of the heat transfer and flow resistance of large and small hole (LASH) baffle heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng 54(2):536–54010.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.01.037 ↗
20. Arsenyeva OP et al (2013) Accounting for the thermal resistance of cooling water fouling in plate heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 61(1):53–5910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.02.045 ↗
21. Sun J et al (2019) Highly elastic and ultrathin nanopaper-based nanocomposites with superior electric and thermal characteristics. J Mater Sci 54(11):8436–844910.1007/s10853-019-03472-1 ↗
22. He X et al (2018) Improved thermal conductivity of polydimethylsiloxane/short carbon fiber composites prepared by spatial confining forced network assembly. J Mater Sci 53(20):14299–1431010.1007/s10853-018-2618-4 ↗
23. Chen S et al (2020) Optimal scaling analysis of polymeric microneedle length and its effect on transdermal insulin delivery. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol 56:10154710.1016/j.jddst.2020.101547 ↗
24. Zhuang J et al (2018) Fabrication and testing of metal/polymer microstructure heat exchangers based on micro embossed molding method. Microsyst Technol 25(2):381–38810.1007/s00542-018-3988-x ↗
25. Jingyao S et al (2018) Rapid fabrication of micro structure on polypropylene by plate to plate isothermal hot embossing method. Polym Eng Sci 58(6):952–96010.1002/pen.24651 ↗
26. Wu D et al (2017) Rapid fabrication of microstructure on PMMA substrate by the plate to plate Transition-Spanning isothermal hot embossing method nearby glass transition temperature. Polym Eng Sci 57(3):268–27410.1002/pen.24408 ↗
27. Su F et al (2019) Efficient preparation of PDMS-based conductive composites using self-designed automatic equipment and an application example. J Polym Eng 39(10):892–90110.1515/polyeng-2019-0086 ↗
28. Zhuang J et al (2019) Edge effect in hot embossing and its influence on global pattern replication of polymer-based microneedles. Int Polym Proc 34(2):231–23810.3139/217.3726 ↗
29. Sun J et al (2018) Numerical simulation and experimental study of filling process of micro prism by isothermal hot embossing in solid-like state. Adv Polym Technol 37(6):1581–159110.1002/adv.21815 ↗
30. Sun J et al (2019) Simple and affordable way to achieve polymeric superhydrophobic surfaces with biomimetic hierarchical roughness. ACS Omega 4(2):2750–275710.1021/acsomega.8b03138 ↗