journal article·2012-12

Phase stability of V–Ta alloy using cluster expansion and Monte Carlo techniques

Ravi Chinnappan

Calphad· Volume 39
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The ground states and the solid state part of the phase diagram of V–Ta alloys are examined by combining the Density Functional Theory based total energy calculations with the cluster expansion and the Monte Carlo techniques. In agreement with experiments, our cluster expansion of V–Ta alloy, based on the bcc lattice, does not find any compound ground state. Cluster expansion of V–Ta, based on C15 Laves lattice, on the other hand, clearly establishes that V 2 Ta is the ground state composition. Phase equilibrium computed by Monte Carlo simulations, using these cluster expansion Hamiltonians, produces phase boundaries in good agreement with CALPHAD and experimental literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. T.B. Massalski, Hiroaki Okamoto, P.R. Subramanian, Lind Kacprzak (Eds.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, vol. 3, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1990.
2. Ravi · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 05420210.1103/PhysRevB.85.054202 ↗
3. Connolly · Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 27 · 516910.1103/PhysRevB.27.5169 ↗
4. Sanchez · Physica A · 1984 · 128 · 33410.1016/0378-4371(84)90096-7 ↗
5. Ferreira · Int. J. Supercomp. Appl. · 1991 · 5 · 3410.1177/109434209100500103 ↗
6. Ceder · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1993 · 1 · 14410.1016/0927-0256(93)90005-8 ↗
7. van de Walle · J. Phase Equilib. · 2002 · 23 · 34810.1361/105497102770331596 ↗
8. van de Walle · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2002 · 10 · 52110.1088/0965-0393/10/5/304 ↗
9. Zunger · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2002 · 10 · 68510.1088/0965-0393/10/6/306 ↗
10. van de Walle · Calphad · 2009 · 33 · 26610.1016/j.calphad.2008.12.005 ↗
11. Sanchez · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 22420210.1103/PhysRevB.81.224202 ↗
12. Ravi · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 10411110.1103/PhysRevB.81.104111 ↗
13. Lu · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 44 · 51210.1103/PhysRevB.44.512 ↗
14. Asta · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 505510.1103/PhysRevB.46.5055 ↗
15. Laks · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 1258710.1103/PhysRevB.46.12587 ↗
16. Ozolins · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 506910.1103/PhysRevB.48.5069 ↗
17. Garbulsky · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 6710.1103/PhysRevB.51.67 ↗
18. Muller · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · R1429
19. Press · 1986
20. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
21. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
22. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
23. Blochl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
24. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
25. Methfessel · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 40 · 361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
26. Monkhorst · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
27. Wolverton · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 576610.1103/PhysRevB.48.5766 ↗
28. de Fontaine · 1994 · vol. 47 · 33
29. Pavlu · Calphad · 2011 · 35 · 10310.1016/j.calphad.2010.12.002 ↗
30. Blum · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 02010310.1103/PhysRevB.69.020103 ↗
31. Blum · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 02010410.1103/PhysRevB.72.020104 ↗
32. Ducastelle · 1991
33. Blum · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 16511310.1103/PhysRevB.72.165113 ↗
34. Lerch · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 17 · 05500310.1088/0965-0393/17/5/055003 ↗
35. Seko · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 16512210.1103/PhysRevB.80.165122 ↗
36. Mueller · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 18410710.1103/PhysRevB.82.184107 ↗