Thermodynamic assessment of Sn–Cu–Ce system
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Phase relations of Sn–Cu–Ce system are important in understanding metallurgical role of Ce in Sn–Cu based lead-free solder alloys. Thermodynamic assessment of Sn–Cu–Ce ternary system has been done based on experimental data about phase equilibria and thermodynamic properties by using the CALPHAD approach combined with first-principle calculations of formation enthalpy of key compounds. The solution phases (liquid, Fcc_A1, Bcc_A2 and Bct_A5) were treated as substitutional, of which the excess Gibbs energies were modeled by the Redlich–Kister polynomial. Considering its crystal structure and solid solubility range, intermetallic compound Ce11Sn10 was described with a three-sublattice model (Ce)0.429(Sn)0.429(Ce,Cu,Sn)0.142. Other binary and ternary intermetallic compounds were described as stoichiometric phases because of their limited homogeneity ranges. During optimization, Ce–Sn binary system was first assessed; then phase relations in Sn–Cu–Ce ternary system were modeled by combining with the optimized Ce–Cu and Cu–Sn binary systems in literatures. A set of thermodynamic parameters for all known phases were obtained, which can reproduce most experimental data. The Scheil model was used to simulate the process of non-equilibrium solidification for a series of alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys · Metallurgical and Alloy Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang · J. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 20 · 685
2. Wu · J. Electron. Mater. · 2003 · 31 · 92810.1007/s11664-002-0185-5 ↗
3. Xiao · J. Electron. Mater. · 2006 · 35 · 109510.1007/BF02692572 ↗
4. Bo · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 484 · 28610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.083 ↗
5. Shim · Z. Metallkd. · 1996 · 87 · 205
6. Vogel · Z. Anorg. Chem. · 1911 · 72 · 31910.1002/zaac.19110720118 ↗
7. Vogel · Z. Metallkd. · 1943 · 35 · 29
8. Franceschi · J. Therm. Anal. · 1988 · 34 · 45110.1007/BF01913184 ↗
9. Borzone · J. Less-Common Met. · 1982 · 85 · 19510.1016/0022-5088(82)90070-4 ↗
10. Weitzer · J. Less-Common Met. · 1991 · 175 · 33110.1016/0022-5088(91)90019-Z ↗
11. Riani · J. Phase Equil. · 1998 · 19 · 23910.1361/105497198770342256 ↗
12. Colinet · J. Less-Common Met. · 1984 · 102 · 16710.1016/0022-5088(84)90313-8 ↗
13. Borsese · J. Less-Common Met. · 1980 · 70 · 21310.1016/0022-5088(80)90230-1 ↗
14. Mathews · J. Alloys Compd. · 1995 · 228 · 110.1016/0925-8388(95)01608-2 ↗
15. Marazza · Intermetallics · 1996 · 4 · 13110.1016/0966-9795(95)00026-7 ↗
16. Riani · Intermetallics · 1997 · 5 · 50710.1016/S0966-9795(97)00021-6 ↗
17. Komarovskaya · Dokl. AN USSR, Ser. B; Cryst. Struct. Exp. Magn. Prop. · 1984 · 8 · 40
18. Singh · J. Alloys Compd. · 2001 · 317–318 · 56010.1016/S0925-8388(00)01388-8 ↗
19. Kostyantyn Korniyenko, Ternary Alloy Systems Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data Critically Evaluated by MSIT, vol. IV, 2010, pp. 128–151.
20. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
21. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
22. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
23. Kresse · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
24. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
25. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
26. Dinsdale · CALPHAD · 1991 · 15 · 31710.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N ↗
27. Redlich · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 1948 · 40 · 34510.1021/ie50458a036 ↗
28. Fernandez Guillermet · Z. Metallkd. · 1988 · 79 · 88
29. Smith · Acta Crystallogr. · 1967 · 23 · 64010.1107/S0365110X67003329 ↗
30. Scheil · Z. Metallkd. · 1942 · 34 · 70