journal article·2013-12

Thermodynamic assessment of Sn–Cu–Ce system

Juan Li, Xiaoma Tao, Sisi Dong, Feng Yang, Huashan Liu, Zhanpeng Jin, Feng Zheng

Calphad· Volume 43
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Phase relations of Sn–Cu–Ce system are important in understanding metallurgical role of Ce in Sn–Cu based lead-free solder alloys. Thermodynamic assessment of Sn–Cu–Ce ternary system has been done based on experimental data about phase equilibria and thermodynamic properties by using the CALPHAD approach combined with first-principle calculations of formation enthalpy of key compounds. The solution phases (liquid, Fcc_A1, Bcc_A2 and Bct_A5) were treated as substitutional, of which the excess Gibbs energies were modeled by the Redlich–Kister polynomial. Considering its crystal structure and solid solubility range, intermetallic compound Ce11Sn10 was described with a three-sublattice model (Ce)0.429(Sn)0.429(Ce,Cu,Sn)0.142. Other binary and ternary intermetallic compounds were described as stoichiometric phases because of their limited homogeneity ranges. During optimization, Ce–Sn binary system was first assessed; then phase relations in Sn–Cu–Ce ternary system were modeled by combining with the optimized Ce–Cu and Cu–Sn binary systems in literatures. A set of thermodynamic parameters for all known phases were obtained, which can reproduce most experimental data. The Scheil model was used to simulate the process of non-equilibrium solidification for a series of alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys · Metallurgical and Alloy Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang · J. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 20 · 685
2. Wu · J. Electron. Mater. · 2003 · 31 · 92810.1007/s11664-002-0185-5 ↗
3. Xiao · J. Electron. Mater. · 2006 · 35 · 109510.1007/BF02692572 ↗
4. Bo · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 484 · 28610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.083 ↗
5. Shim · Z. Metallkd. · 1996 · 87 · 205
6. Vogel · Z. Anorg. Chem. · 1911 · 72 · 31910.1002/zaac.19110720118 ↗
7. Vogel · Z. Metallkd. · 1943 · 35 · 29
8. Franceschi · J. Therm. Anal. · 1988 · 34 · 45110.1007/BF01913184 ↗
9. Borzone · J. Less-Common Met. · 1982 · 85 · 19510.1016/0022-5088(82)90070-4 ↗
10. Weitzer · J. Less-Common Met. · 1991 · 175 · 33110.1016/0022-5088(91)90019-Z ↗
11. Riani · J. Phase Equil. · 1998 · 19 · 23910.1361/105497198770342256 ↗
12. Colinet · J. Less-Common Met. · 1984 · 102 · 16710.1016/0022-5088(84)90313-8 ↗
13. Borsese · J. Less-Common Met. · 1980 · 70 · 21310.1016/0022-5088(80)90230-1 ↗
14. Mathews · J. Alloys Compd. · 1995 · 228 · 110.1016/0925-8388(95)01608-2 ↗
15. Marazza · Intermetallics · 1996 · 4 · 13110.1016/0966-9795(95)00026-7 ↗
16. Riani · Intermetallics · 1997 · 5 · 50710.1016/S0966-9795(97)00021-6 ↗
17. Komarovskaya · Dokl. AN USSR, Ser. B; Cryst. Struct. Exp. Magn. Prop. · 1984 · 8 · 40
18. Singh · J. Alloys Compd. · 2001 · 317–318 · 56010.1016/S0925-8388(00)01388-8 ↗
19. Kostyantyn Korniyenko, Ternary Alloy Systems Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data Critically Evaluated by MSIT, vol. IV, 2010, pp. 128–151.
20. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
21. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
22. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
23. Kresse · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
24. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
25. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 46 · 667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
26. Dinsdale · CALPHAD · 1991 · 15 · 31710.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N ↗
27. Redlich · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 1948 · 40 · 34510.1021/ie50458a036 ↗
28. Fernandez Guillermet · Z. Metallkd. · 1988 · 79 · 88
29. Smith · Acta Crystallogr. · 1967 · 23 · 64010.1107/S0365110X67003329 ↗
30. Scheil · Z. Metallkd. · 1942 · 34 · 70