Design of ESR slag for remelting 9CrMoCoB steel through experiments and thermodynamic calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To control the chemically active boron (B) in 9CrMoCoB within a narrow target range, thermodynamic calculations using FactSage 7.2 and equilibrium reaction experiments were conducted between slag and steel. First, equilibrium reaction experiments between 9CrMoCoB and slag of 55%CaF2–20%CaO–3%MgO–22%Al2O3–x%B2O3 (x ≤ 3) were conducted to supplement and optimize the Henrian activity coefficient γ (lgγ = A/T + C, where A and C are constants) of B2O3 in the solution phase of FToxid-OXYL in FactSage 7.2. Second, the equilibrium reactions between 9CrMoCoB steel and slag of 55%CaF2–20%CaO–3%MgO–22%Al2O3–x%SiO2–y%B2O3 (x ≤ 3, y ≤ 3) were calculated by using FactSage 7.2 to study the effects of B2O3, SiO2, and O2 in the atmosphere on the contents of B, Si, and O in steel. Then, equilibrium reaction experiments were conducted to validate the calculated results. Finally, suitable slag was designed, and electroslag remelting (ESR) experiments were conducted for verification. Results showed that A = −6582 and C = 0 in the Henrian activity coefficient equation were suitable to the slag of 55%CaF2–20%CaO–3%MgO–22%Al2O3–x%SiO2–y%B2O3 (x ≤ 3, y ≤ 3), and the appropriate slag for ESR remelting the 9CrMoCoB steel was 55%CaF2–20%CaO–3%MgO–22%Al2O3–1%SiO2–1%B2O3. The volume percent of O2 had a stronger influence on the Si content, compared with B content. The volume percent of O2 should be less than 0.05% to produce the qualified 9CrMoCoB ingot when using the designed proper slag.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Viswanathan · Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip. · 2006 · 83 · 77810.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.08.006 ↗
2. Viswanathan · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2005 · 14 · 28110.1361/10599490524039 ↗
3. Blaes · Energy Mater · 2007 · 2 · 20710.1179/174892408X382879 ↗
4. Kim · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2010 · 654 · 39810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.398 ↗
5. Masuyama · ISIJ Int. · 2001 · 41 · 61210.2355/isijinternational.41.612 ↗
6. Knabl · BHM · 2018 · 163 · 355
7. Beeley · 2005 · 45
8. Mitchell · J-STAGE · 1984 · 24 · 547
9. Sawa · Tetsu-To-Hagane · 1977 · 63 · 219810.2355/tetsutohagane1955.63.13_2198 ↗
10. Reyes-Carmona · ISIJ Int. · 1992 · 32 · 52910.2355/isijinternational.32.529 ↗
11. Pateisky · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1972 · 9 · 131810.1116/1.1317029 ↗
12. Medina · ISIJ Int. · 1993 · 33 · 124410.2355/isijinternational.33.1244 ↗
13. Fedko · Ironmak. Steelmak. · 1989 · 16 · 116
14. Hou · MTB · 2016 · 47 · 146510.1007/s11663-015-0530-8 ↗
15. Hou · MTB · 2019 · 1
16. Bale · Calphad · 2009 · 33 · 29510.1016/j.calphad.2008.09.009 ↗
17. Bale · Calphad · 2016 · 55 · 110.1016/j.calphad.2016.07.004 ↗
18. Mohanasundaram · T. Indian I. Metals · 2019 · 72 · 111110.1007/s12666-019-01585-4 ↗
19. van Dyk · Fuel · 2009 · 88 · 6710.1016/j.fuel.2008.07.034 ↗
20. Ren · Ironmak. Steelmak. · 2017 · 44 · 49710.1080/03019233.2016.1216632 ↗
21. Huang · 1981 · 309