Thermodynamic evaluations of the iron–lutetium and iron–thulium systems

Abstract The iron–lutetium and iron–thulium binary systems needed to be reassessed after the previous thermodynamic evaluation by Konar (2012) [1] because significant discrepancies were observed with the experimental data. Furthermore new thermodynamic data were published in the meantime. In the present work, the modelings were carried out with the help of the CALPHAD (CALculation of PHAse Diagram) method. The seven intermediate phases Fe 23 Lu 6 , Fe 3 Lu, Fe 2 Lu, Fe 17 Tm 2 , Fe 23 Tm 6 , Fe 3 Tm and Fe 2 Tm in these two binary systems have been treated as stoichiometric compounds while the Fe 17 Lu 2 substoichiometric intermetallic compound in Lu, in the Fe–Lu binary system which has a homogeneity range, was treated by a two-sublattice model with convenient substitution in each sublattice (Sundman et al., 1985 [2] ). A solution model has been used for the description of the liquid phase and the (Fe), (Lu) and (Tm) solid solutions. The excess term of the Gibbs energy of the solution phases was assessed with the Redlich–Kister (Redlich and Kister, 1948 [3] ) polynomial equation. The calculations based on the thermodynamic modeling are in good agreement with the phase diagram data and experimental thermodynamic values available in the literature.