Thermodynamic stability of oxide phases of Fe–Cr based ODS steels via quantum mechanical calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Using density functional theory-based calculated formation and reaction enthalpies, we have examined the relative stability of a large number of likely oxide phases of typical ODS steels based on the Fe–Cr–Al–Ti–Y–O system. Calculated formation and reaction enthalpies are in good agreement with available measured values. The relatively more negative formation enthalpies of Y2O3, Y2TiO5, Y4Al2O9, Y2Ti2O7 and YAlO3 oxides show them to be more stable corroborating with their observation in the microstructure of ODS steels. Analysis of reaction enthalpies, guided by convex-hull consideration, gives a mechanism by which reaction of Y2O3 with Al2O3 for the formation of YAlO3, Y4Al2O9, and Y3Al5O12 and reaction of Y2O3 with TiO2 for the formation of Y2TiO5 and Y2Ti2O7 are favored over other likely oxides, such as, those based on Y–Fe–O, Y–Cr–O and Fe–Cr–O.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. Okuda · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1995 · 14 · 160010.1007/BF00455428 ↗
2. Ukai · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 1997 · 34 · 25610.1080/18811248.1997.9733658 ↗
3. Kimura · ISIJ Int. · 1999 · 39 · 17610.2355/isijinternational.39.176 ↗
4. Sagaradze · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 295 · 26510.1016/S0022-3115(01)00511-6 ↗
5. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 77310.1016/S0022-3115(02)01046-2 ↗
6. Ukai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 74910.1016/S0022-3115(02)01043-7 ↗
7. de Castro · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 322 · 22810.1016/S0022-3115(03)00330-1 ↗
8. Miller · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · 353 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00680-9 ↗
9. Alinger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 38210.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.042 ↗
10. Klimiankou · Micron · 2005 · 36 · 110.1016/j.micron.2004.08.001 ↗
11. El-Genk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 340 · 9310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.118 ↗
12. Miller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 351 · 26110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.004 ↗
13. Oka · Mater. Trans. · 2007 · 48 · 256310.2320/matertrans.MD200715 ↗
14. Miao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 20810.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.144 ↗
15. Kasada · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 22210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.141 ↗
16. Sakasegawa · J. Alloys Compd. · 2008 · 452 · 210.1016/j.jallcom.2007.01.177 ↗
17. Marquis · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 18190410.1063/1.3000965 ↗
18. de Castro · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 44910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.136 ↗
19. Kishimoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 53310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.169 ↗
20. Oksiuta · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 05500310.1088/0029-5515/49/5/055003 ↗
21. Alinger · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 39210.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.025 ↗
22. Ratti · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 54010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.171 ↗
23. Ohnuma · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 557110.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.054 ↗
24. Xu · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 02020410.1103/PhysRevB.79.020204 ↗
25. Hsiung · Mater. Lett. · 2010 · 64 · 178210.1016/j.matlet.2010.05.039 ↗
26. Hsiung · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 18410310.1103/PhysRevB.82.184103 ↗
27. Nguyen · Adv. Nat. Sci. · 2010 · 1 · 035009
28. Jiang · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 153610.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.061 ↗
29. J.R. Rieken, I.E. Anderson, FAPMI, M.J. Kramer, Int. J. Powder Metall. 46 (2010) 17.
30. de Castro · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 392710.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.017 ↗
31. Hirata · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 92210.1038/nmat3150 ↗
32. Mao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 428 · 8210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.011 ↗
33. Lee · Front. Energy · 2012 · 6 · 2910.1007/s11708-012-0178-x ↗
34. Wang · J. Alloys Compd. · 2012 · 529 · 9610.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.143 ↗
35. Karak · Philos. Mag. · 2012 · 92 · 51610.1080/14786435.2011.619508 ↗
36. Fu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 22550210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.225502 ↗
37. Jiang · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 06410310.1103/PhysRevB.79.064103 ↗
38. Fang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 05550310.1103/PhysRevLett.105.055503 ↗
39. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
40. Kresses · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
41. Blochl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
42. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
43. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 385610.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
44. Blochl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 1622310.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
45. Monkhorst · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
46. Pearson · 1967 · vol. 2
47. MatNavi, NIMS Materials Database, 〈http://mits.nims.go.jp/index_en.html〉.
48. Gajovic · J. Alloys Compd. · 2008 · 456 · 31310.1016/j.jallcom.2007.02.083 ↗
49. Ramesha · J. Phys. · 2007 · 19 · 102202
50. Errandonea · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 13410910.1103/PhysRevB.83.134109 ↗
51. du Boulay · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1995 · 51 · 92110.1107/S0108768195004010 ↗
52. Matsumoto · Physica B · 1992 · 180–181 · 60310.1016/0921-4526(92)90408-K ↗
53. Abbas · Eur. J. Sci. Res. · 2009 · 36 · 154
54. Diehl · Mat. Res. Bull. · 1975 · 10 · 8510.1016/0025-5408(75)90125-7 ↗
55. Christensen · Acta Chem. Scand. · 1991 · 45 · 22610.3891/acta.chem.scand.45-0226 ↗
56. Xu · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 1053010.1103/PhysRevB.59.10530 ↗
57. Walsh · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 16511910.1103/PhysRevB.76.165119 ↗
58. Hester · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1997 · 53 · 73910.1107/S010876819700551X ↗
59. Mumme · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1968 · 24 · 132710.1107/S0567740868004243 ↗
60. Matteucci · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 222910.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.008 ↗
61. Skala · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2009 · 29 · 6710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.05.037 ↗
62. Wu · J. Solid State Chem. · 2010 · 183 · 248310.1016/j.jssc.2010.08.020 ↗
63. Morosin · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 1978 · 11 · 12110.1107/S0021889878012868 ↗
64. Chevrier · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 07512210.1103/PhysRevB.82.075122 ↗
65. Grimvall · 1999
66. Cox · 1992
67. Atkins · 1990
68. Wang · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 19510710.1103/PhysRevB.73.195107 ↗
69. Hautier · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 15520810.1103/PhysRevB.85.155208 ↗
70. 〈https://www.materialsproject.org/apps/reaction_calculator/〉.
71. Kubaschewski · 1993
72. 〈http://kinetics.nist.gov/janaf/〉.
73. Zhang · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 44 · 1331910.1103/PhysRevB.44.13319 ↗
74. Rollmann · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 16510710.1103/PhysRevB.69.165107 ↗
75. Long · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 10440210.1103/PhysRevB.75.104402 ↗
76. Wu · Bull. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 35 · 25910.1007/s12034-012-0278-6 ↗
77. Ching · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 688310.1063/1.1357837 ↗
78. Xing · Intermetallics · 2012 · 28 · 1610.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.033 ↗
79. Greenwood · 1997
80. The convex-hull construction, based on reaction enthalpies, effectively evaluates the stability of a given compound against any linear combination of compounds that have the same average composition, and is the common procedure to determine the stability of a compound versus decomposition to other products (Ref. [69], and Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 10 (2002) 685).