The alloy theoretic automated toolkit: A user guide
Source abstract
Abstract
Although the formalism that allows the calculation of alloy thermodynamic properties from first-principles has been known for decades, its practical implementation has so far remained a tedious process. The Alloy Theoretic Automated Toolkit (ATAT) drastically simplifies this procedure by implementing decision rules based on formal statistical analysis that frees the researchers from a constant monitoring during the calculation process and automatically "glues" together the input and the output of various codes, in order to provide a high-level interface to the calculation of alloy thermodynamic properties from first-principles. ATAT implements the Structure Inversion Method (SIM), also known as the Connolly-Williams method, in combination with semi-grand-canonical Monte Carlo simulations. In order to make this powerful toolkit available to the wide community of researchers who could benefit from it, this article present a concise user guide outlining the steps required to obtain thermodynamic information from ab initio calculations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Ducastelle · 1991
2. de Fontaine · Solid State Phys. · 1994 · 47 · 3310.1016/S0081-1947(08)60639-6 ↗
3. Zunger · 1994 · Vol. 319 · 361
4. Zunger · MRS Bull. · 1997 · 22 · 2010.1557/S0883769400033364 ↗
5. Wolverton · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2000 · 12 · 274910.1088/0953-8984/12/12/314 ↗
6. Ceder · Modelling Simul. Mater Sci Eng. · 2000 · 8 · 31110.1088/0965-0393/8/3/311 ↗
7. Asta · JOM — Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society · 2001 · 53 · 1610.1007/s11837-001-0062-3 ↗
8. van de Walle · 2001
9. Sanchez · Physica · 1984 · 128A · 33410.1016/0378-4371(84)90096-7 ↗
10. Newman · 1999
11. Binder · 1988
12. Dünweg · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 1418210.1103/PhysRevB.48.14182 ↗
13. Laradji · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 489410.1103/PhysRevB.51.4894 ↗
14. Connolly · Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 27 · 516910.1103/PhysRevB.27.5169 ↗
15. van der Ven · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 297510.1103/PhysRevB.58.2975 ↗
16. Garbulksy · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 6710.1103/PhysRevB.51.67 ↗
17. Ozoliņš · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 642710.1103/PhysRevB.57.6427 ↗
18. Kohan · Comp. Mat. Sci. · 1998 · 9 · 38910.1016/S0927-0256(97)00168-7 ↗
19. Kikuchi · Phys. Rev. · 1951 · 81 · 98810.1103/PhysRev.81.988 ↗
20. van de Walle · Journal of Phase Equilibria · 2002 · 23 · 34810.1361/105497102770331596 ↗
21. van de Walle · Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2002 · 10 · 52110.1088/0965-0393/10/5/304 ↗
22. Ducastelle · Journal of Physics F — Metal Physics · 1976 · 6 · 203910.1088/0305-4608/6/11/005 ↗
23. Turchi · 1995 · Vol. 1 · 21
24. Sluiter · 2000
25. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
26. Kresse · Comp. Mat. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
27. Woodward · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 09410310.1103/PhysRevB.63.094103 ↗
28. Laks · Physical Review B · 1992 · 46 · 1258710.1103/PhysRevB.46.12587 ↗
29. van de Walle · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2002 · 74 · 1110.1103/RevModPhys.74.11 ↗