Differing pressure response of lattice structure in LaTMSb2 (TM = Au or Ag) ternary antimonides
Source abstract
Abstract
Ternary antimonides LaTMSb2 (TM = Au or Ag) share identical lattice symmetry and exhibit the charge density wave (CDW) phenomenon. The CDW is found to be tunable either by physical or chemical pressure, triggering the investigation of the pressure response of these systems. Here, we compare the lattice structure response of the two systems to the hydrostatic pressure. Under hydrostatic pressure, the lattice structure of LaAgSb2 transformed from tetragonal to a mixed tetragonal (>4 GPa) followed by monoclinic (4–9 GPa) and then to a mixed monoclinic and orthorhombic (9–41.8 GPa) phases. In contrast, our synchrotron X-ray diffraction results on LaAuSb2 reveal that the tetragonal structure is stable in the pressure range of 0–12.2 GPa. Our experimental investigation is well supported by the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. We have used DFT to identify the experimental Raman vibrational modes at ambient conditions. We highlight the importance of structural subtleties in the differing pressure response of the ternary antimonides.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron-based superconductors research · Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Akiba K, Nishimori H, Umeshita N and Kobayashi T C 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 08513410.1103/PhysRevB.103.085134 ↗
2. Akiba K, Umeshita N and Kobayashi T C 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 03510810.1103/PhysRevB.105.035108 ↗
3. Balicas L, Nakatsuji S, Lee H, Schlottmann P, Murphy T P and Fisk Z 2006 AIP Conf. Proc. 850 69310.1063/1.2354899 ↗
4. Bud’ko S L, Wiener T A, Ribeiro R A, Canfield P C, Lee Y, Vogt T et al 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 18411110.1103/PhysRevB.73.184111 ↗
5. Du F, Su H, Luo S S, Shen B, Nie Z Y, Yin L C et al 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 14451010.1103/PhysRevB.102.144510 ↗
6. Falkowski M, Doležal P, Andreev A V, Duverger-Nédellec E and Havela L 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 06410310.1103/PhysRevB.100.064103 ↗
7. Fonari A and Stauffer S 2013 https://github.com/raman-sc/VASP/
8. Hasan M Z and Kane C L 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 304510.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 ↗
9. Hase I and Yanagisawa T 2014 Phys. Procedia 58 4210.1016/j.phpro.2014.09.011 ↗
10. Inada Y, Thamizhavel A, Yamagami H, Takeuchi T, Sawai Y, Ikeda S et al 2002 Philos. Mag. B 82 1867
11. Kresse G and Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
12. Kresse G and Furthmüller J 1996 Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
13. Kuo C N, Shen D, Li B S, Quyen N N, Tzeng W Y, Luo C W et al 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 23512110.1103/PhysRevB.99.235121 ↗
14. Lingannan G, Joseph B, Sundaramoorthy M, Kuo C N, Lue C S and Arumugam S 2022 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34 245601
15. Lingannan G, Joseph B, Vajeeston P, Kuo C N, Lue C S, Kalaiselvan G et al 2021 Phys. Rev. B 103 19512610.1103/PhysRevB.103.195126 ↗
16. Lotti P, Milani S, Merlini M, Joseph B, Alabarse F and Lausi A 2020 J. Synchrotron Radiat. 27 22210.1107/S1600577519015170 ↗
17. Neto A C, Guinea F, Peres N M, Novoselov K S and Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
18. Perdew J P, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
19. Richard P, Nakayama K, Sato T, Neupane M, Xu Y M, Bowen J H et al 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 13700110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.137001 ↗
20. Shi X, Richard P, Wang K, Liu M, Matt C E, Xu N et al 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 081105(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.93.081105 ↗
21. Singha R, Samanta S, Bhattacharya T S, Chatterjee S, Roy S, Wang L et al 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 20510310.1103/PhysRevB.102.205103 ↗
22. Song C, Park J, Koo Lee K B, Rhee J Y, Bud’ko S L et al 2003 Phys. Rev. B 68 03511310.1103/PhysRevB.68.035113 ↗
23. Torikachvili M S, Bud’ko S L, Law S A, Tillman M E, Mun E D and Canfield P C 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 23511010.1103/PhysRevB.76.235110 ↗
24. Wang K and Petrovic C 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 15521310.1103/PhysRevB.86.155213 ↗
25. Zhai H F, Tang Z T, Jiang H, Xu K, Zhang K, Zhang P et al 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 06451810.1103/PhysRevB.90.064518 ↗
26. Zhang B, An C, Chen X, Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Yuan Y et al 2021 Chinese Phys. B 30 07620110.1088/1674-1056/abf643 ↗