journal article·2021-12

Boltzmann equation for the modelling of formation of silver nanoparticles using trisodium citrate as the reducing agent

Jadhav Pankaj Nagnath, Delphy Davis, P Ovia, SamDavid Swaminathan, Kannan Deepa

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The kinetics of formation of silver nanoparticles using trisodium citrate as the reducing agent was studied in order to evaluate the rate constants and the rate expression. The inability to measure the concentration of the reactant (precursor silver salt) at millimolar concentrations using conventional spectrophotometric techniques renders the studies of kinetics cumbersome. An attempt was made to study the kinetics of this reaction by measuring the concentration of silver nanoparticles instead of the silver ions as a function of time. The initial concentration of the reducing agent (trisodium citrate) was taken to be nearly 20 times that of the initial concentration of the silver ions. Hence, the reaction could be modelled as pseudo-first-order kinetics, considering the bimolecular nature of the reaction. The final second-order rate constant was evaluated using integral method of analysis as 0.254 l (g min)–1. The key steps in the formation of silver nanoparticles (i.e., reduction, nucleation, growth and saturation) were modelled as a sigmoidal plot using Boltzmann equation. A very good fit of experimental data (R2 ≈ 0.99) was observed with the model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Sondi I, Goia D V and Matijević E 2003 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 260 7510.1016/S0021-9797(02)00205-9 ↗
2. Rai M, Yadav A and Gade A 2009 Biotechnol. Adv. 27 7610.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 ↗
3. Lara H H, Ixtepan-Turrent L, Jose Yacaman M and Lopez-Ribot J 2020 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 2118310.1021/acsami.9b20708 ↗
4. Sivakumar M, Surendar S, Jayakumar M, Seedevi P, Sivasankar P, Ravikumar M et al 2020 J. Cluster Sci. 1 1
5. Atabaev T S 2018 Mater. Sci. 12 207
6. Sanzone G, Zimbone M, Cacciato G, Ruffino F, Carles R, Privitera V et al 2018 Superlattices Microstruct. 123 39410.1016/j.spmi.2018.09.028 ↗
7. Rafiquee M Z A, Siddiqui M R, Ali M S, Al-Lohedan H A and Al-Othman Z A 2015 Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 38 71110.1007/s00449-014-1311-5 ↗
8. Deshpande J B and Kulkarni A A 2018 Chem. Eng. Technol. 41 15710.1002/ceat.201700035 ↗
9. Htwe Y Z N, Chow W S, Suda Y and Mariatti M 2019 Mater. Today 17 568
10. Luty-Blocho M, Pacławski K, Jaworski W, Streszewski B, Fitzner K 2011 in V Starov and K Procházka (eds) Trends in colloid and interface science XXIV (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer) p 3910.1007/978-3-642-19038-4_7 ↗
11. Rashid M U, Bhuiyan M K H and Quayum M E 2013 Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 12 29
12. Levenspiel O 1998 Chemical reaction engineering (New York: John Wiley & Sons) p 44
13. Šileikaitė A, Puišo J, Prosyčevas I and Tamulevičius S 2009 Mater. Sci. (Medžiagotyra) 15 21