journal article·2021-09

Modeling and simulation of temperature nano-probes for nano-devices with variable powers

Chengfeng Zhou, Yixuan Cui, Xiangfu Wang, Yanyan Bu

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The shape of the temperature nano-probes is a significant factor to evaluate the temperature measurement accuracy in the nanoscale temperature detection. Based on the finite element numerical simulation method, the temperature nano-probe model is established for nano-devices with variable powers. The temperature nano-probes with different shapes of sphere, rod, tube and disk are designed and studied. It is found that the heat transfer process between the nano-device and the temperature nano-probes is affected by the shape of nano-probes. Additionally it is dependent on the size of the device and the gap distance between the nano-device and nano-probes. The high stability and accuracy in the temperature measurement process is obtained in case of the nano-probe with the shape of nano-disk. The temperature error can be minimized through controlling the side length of the disk.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor Technologies Research · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Samson B, Aigouy L, Löw P, Bergaud C, Kim B J, Mortier M et al 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 02310110.1063/1.2832673 ↗
2. Lee J and Kotov N A 2007 Nano Today 2 4810.1016/S1748-0132(07)70019-1 ↗
3. Brites C D, Lima P P, Silva N J, Millán A, Amaral V S, Palacio F et al 2010 Adv. Mater. 22 449910.1002/adma.201001780 ↗
4. Yue Y and Wang X 2012 Nano Rev. 3 1158610.3402/nano.v3i0.11586 ↗
5. Bahmani B, Bacon D and Anvari B 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 110.1038/srep02180 ↗
6. Guo J, Wang X and Wang T 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 06353710.1063/1.2714679 ↗
7. Spiece J, Evangeli C, Lulla K, Robson A, Robinson B, Kolosov O et al 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 01510110.1063/1.5031085 ↗
8. Majumdar A 1999 Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 29 50510.1146/annurev.matsci.29.1.505 ↗
9. Gomès S, Assy A and Chapuis P O 2015 Phys. Status Solidi A 212 47710.1002/pssa.201400360 ↗
10. Christofferson J, Maize K, Ezzahri Y, Shabani J, Wang X and Shakouri A 2008 J. Electron. Packag. 130 04110110.1115/1.2993145 ↗
11. Kim K, Jeong W, Lee W and Reddy P 2012 ACS Nano 6 424810.1021/nn300774n ↗
12. Menges F, Mensch P, Schmid H, Riel H, Stemmer A and Gotsmann B 2016 Nat. Commun. 1 1
13. Hammiche A, Pollock H M, Song M and Hourston D J 1996 Meas. Sci. Technol. 7 14210.1088/0957-0233/7/2/004 ↗
14. Kittel A, Müller-Hirsch W, Parisi J, Biehs S-A, Reddig D and Holthaus M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 22430110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.224301 ↗
15. Tovee P, Pumarol M, Zeze D, Kjoller K and Kolosov O 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 11431710.1063/1.4767923 ↗
16. Shi L and Majumdar A 2002 J. Heat Transfer 124 32910.1115/1.1447939 ↗
17. Park K, Cross G L, Zhang Z M and King W P 2008 J. Heat Transfer 130 10240110.1115/1.2953238 ↗
18. Chapuis P O, Greffet J J, Joulain K and Volz S 2006 Nanotechnology 17 297810.1088/0957-4484/17/12/026 ↗
19. Raeisi-Fard H, Becker N, Hess A, Pashayi K, Proslier T, Pellin M et al 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 19310910.1063/1.4829138 ↗
20. Wang J, Wang M and Li Z 2007 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 46 22810.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.04.012 ↗
21. Shanks H R, Maycock P D, Sidles P H and Danielson G C 1963 Phys. Rev. 130 174310.1103/PhysRev.130.1743 ↗
22. Rhim W K and Ohsaka K 2000 J. Cryst. Growth 208 31310.1016/S0022-0248(99)00437-6 ↗
23. Wilson A A and Borca-Tasciuc T 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 07490310.1063/1.4991017 ↗
24. Mecklenburg M, Hubbard W A, White E R, Dhall R, Cronin S B, Aloni S et al 2015 Science 347 62910.1126/science.aaa2433 ↗
25. Klein P H and Croft W J 1967 J. Appl. Phys. 38 160310.1063/1.1709730 ↗
26. Aggarwal R L, Ripin D J, Ochoa J R and Fan T Y 2005 in Solid state lasers XIV: technology and devices (International Society for Optics and Photonics) p 165
27. Pollnau M, Hardman P J, Kern M A, Clarkson W A and Hanna D C 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 1607610.1103/PhysRevB.58.16076 ↗
28. Ahmadi A, Avazpour A, Nadgaran H and Mousavi M 2018 Laser Phys. 28 10500210.1088/1555-6611/aad288 ↗
29. Bai Z A, Fan Z W, Bai Z X, Lian F Q, Kang Z J, Lin W R et al 2015 Appl. Sci. 5 35910.3390/app5030359 ↗
30. Huang Z, Feng J and Pan W 2012 J. Solid State Chem. 185 4210.1016/j.jssc.2011.10.050 ↗
31. Mamedov B A, Eser E, Koç H and Askerov I M 2009 Int. J. Thermophys. 30 104810.1007/s10765-009-0601-7 ↗
32. Florescu D I, Mourokh L G, Pollak F H, Look D C, Cantwell G, Li X et al 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 91 89010.1063/1.1426234 ↗
33. Jeong J, Li C, Kwon Y, Lee J, Kim S H, Yun R et al 2013 Int. J. Refrig. 36 223310.1016/j.ijrefrig.2013.07.024 ↗