Dependence of cluster growth on the coefficient of restitution in a cooling granular fluid
Source abstract
Abstract
Starting from configurations having homogeneous spatial density, we study kinetics in a two-dimensional system of inelastically colliding hard particles, a popular model for cooling granular matter. Following an initial time period, the system exhibits a crossover to an inhomogeneous regime that is characterized by the formation and growth of particle-rich clusters. We present results on the time dependence of average mass of the clusters and that of average kinetic energy, obtained via event driven molecular dynamics simulations, for a wide range of values for the coefficient of restitution ($e$), by fixing the overall density of particles in the system to a constant number. The time of onset of crossover from homogeneous to the inhomogeneous regime, as is well known, strongly increases as one moves towards the elastic limit. Nevertheless, our presented results suggest that the asymptotic growth is independent of $e$, for uniform definition of cluster, onset of which has a different $e$-dependence than the onset of above mentioned crossover. In other words, not only the exponent but also the amplitude of the power-law growth, which is widely believed to be the form of the evolution, is at the most very weakly sensitive to the choice of $e$. While it is tempting to attribute this fact to the similar feature in the decay of energy, we caution that our current understanding is not matured enough to draw such a connection between cluster growth and energy decay in a meaningful manner.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Granular flow and fluidized beds · Material Dynamics and Properties · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Aranson I S and Tsimring L S 2006 Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 64110.1103/RevModPhys.78.641 ↗
2. Brilliantov N V and Poeschel T 2004 Kinetic theory of granular gases (Oxford: Oxford University Press)10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198530381.001.0001 ↗
3. Brilliantov N, Krapivsky P L, Bodrova A, Spahn F, Hayakawa H, Stadnichuk V et al 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 953610.1073/pnas.1503957112 ↗
4. Mattson L 2016 Planet. Space Sci. 133 10710.1016/j.pss.2016.05.002 ↗
5. Goldhirsch I and Zanetti G 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 161910.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1619 ↗
6. Nie X, Ben-Naim E and Chen S 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 20430110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.204301 ↗
7. Ben-Naim E, Chen S Y, Doolan G D and Redner S 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 406910.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4069 ↗
8. Luding S and Herrmann H J 1999 Chaos 9 67310.1063/1.166441 ↗
9. Brito R and Ernst M H 1998 Europhys. Lett. 43 49710.1209/epl/i1998-00388-9 ↗
10. Haff P K 1983 J. Fluid Mech. 134 40110.1017/S0022112083003419 ↗
11. Bodrova A, Dubey A K, Puri S and Brilliantov N V 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 17800110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.178001 ↗
12. Das S K and Puri S 2003 Europhys. Lett. 61 74910.1209/epl/i2003-00292-4 ↗
13. Das S K and Puri S 2003 Phys. Rev. E 68 01130210.1103/PhysRevE.68.011302 ↗
14. Shinde M, Das D and Rajesh R 2003 Phys. Rev. E 79 02130310.1103/PhysRevE.79.021303 ↗
15. Paul S and Das S K 2014 Europhys. Lett. 108 6600110.1209/0295-5075/108/66001 ↗
16. Paul S and Das S K 2018 Phys. Rev. E 97 03290210.1103/PhysRevE.97.032902 ↗
17. McNamara S and Young W R 1996 Phys. Rev. E 50 R2810.1103/PhysRevE.50.R28 ↗
18. Campbell C S 1990 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22 5710.1146/annurev.fl.22.010190.000421 ↗
19. Luding S and McNamara S 1998 Granular Matter 1 11310.1007/s100350050017 ↗
20. Herbst O, Cafiero R, Zippelius A, Herrmann H J and Luding S 2005 Phys. Fluids 17 10710210.1063/1.2049277 ↗
21. Takada S, Saitoh K and Hayakawa H 2016 Phys. Rev. E 94 01290610.1103/PhysRevE.94.012906 ↗
22. Chen S, Deng Y, Nie X and Tu Y 2000 Phys. Lett. A 269 21810.1016/S0375-9601(00)00243-7 ↗
23. Miller S and Luding S 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 03130510.1103/PhysRevE.69.031305 ↗
24. Bray A J 2002 Adv. Phys. 51 48110.1080/00018730110117433 ↗
25. Binder K 1991 in Phase transformation of materials R W Cahn, P Haasen and E J Kramer (eds) (Weinheim: Wiley VCH), Vol 5, p 405
26. Roy S and Das S K 2013 Soft Matter 9 417810.1039/c3sm50196e ↗
27. Majumder S and Das S K 2011 Europhys. Lett. 95 4600210.1209/0295-5075/95/46002 ↗
28. Shinde M, Das D and Rajesh R 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 23450510.1103/PhysRevLett.99.234505 ↗
29. Carnevale G F, Pomeau Y and Young W R 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 291310.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2913 ↗
30. Paul S and Das S K 2017 Phys. Rev. E 96 01210510.1103/PhysRevE.96.012105 ↗
31. Trizac E and Hansen J-P 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 411410.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4114 ↗
32. Trizac E and Hansen J-P 1996 J. Stat. Phys. 82 134510.1007/BF02183386 ↗
33. Allen M P and Tildesley D J 1987 Computer simulation of liquids (Oxford: Clarendon)
34. Rapaport D C 2004 The art of molecular dynamics simulation (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)10.1017/CBO9780511816581 ↗
35. Fisher M E 1967 Rep. Prog. Phys. 30 61510.1088/0034-4885/30/2/306 ↗
36. Goldenfeld N 1992 Lectures on phase transitions and renormalization group (London: Addison-Wesley)
37. Hummel M, Clewett J P D and Mazza M C 2016 Europhys. Lett. 114 1000210.1209/0295-5075/114/10002 ↗