A DFT investigation of performance of metal-doped nanotubes as acceptable catalysts to SiO oxidation
Source abstract
Abstract
The Fe-doped nanotubes can be considered as novel catalysts to SiO oxidation. The information of SiO oxidation on nano-catalysts is not clear. In this study, the SiO oxidation on Fe-carbon nanotube (CNT) and Fe-boron nitride nanotube (BNNT) is examined through Langmuir-Hinshelwood (LH) and Eley-Rideal (ER) paths. The SiO joins in the Fe atom of Fe-surface- $$\hbox {O}_{\mathrm {2}}$$ * and Fe-surface-O* to create important structures with minor barrier energy. Cis-Fe-surface-OSiOO* in the ER is more stable than structures in LH pathway. In the LH and ER mechanisms the one and two $$\hbox {SiO}_{\mathrm {2}}$$ are released at normal temperature, respectively. The abilities of Fe-CNT and Fe-BNNT to oxidation of SiO is investigated, and Fe-CNT and Fe-BNNT as novel metal-doped catalysts are proposed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Ganster P 2010 Phys. Chem. B81 5315
2. Kim B H 2011 J. Appl. Chem.110 513
3. Kajihara K 2015 J. Chem. Phys.98 29
4. Bongiorno A 2014 Phys. Rev. B70 19531210.1103/PhysRevB.70.195312 ↗
5. Itoh M 2008 J. Appl. Phys.103 02610110.1063/1.2831293 ↗
6. Takahashi Y 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett.84 876
7. Robinson J A 2016 Nano Lett.11 61747
8. Cho K 2013 Nano Lett.2 3513
9. Snow E 2015 Science3 71942
10. Peng S 2014 Chem. Phys. Lett.12 387271
11. Yeung C S 2018 J. Phys. Chem. C11 27401
12. Yoosefian M 2014 Struct. Chem.3 259
13. Star A 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B6 11021014
14. Haruta M 2013 Chem. Rec.4 375
15. Anderson W 2008 Nano Lett.3 8195
16. Zhou X 2007 J. Mol. Struct.11 82265
17. Castellino P 2006 Chem. Select1 40
18. Wei M 2010 Chem. Phys.41 96
19. Arnaldsson N 2014 J. Phys. Chem.1 57
20. Kishimoto T 2017 Chem. Lett.17 581
21. Munoz J 2016 Phys. Chem.14 28
22. Yang Q 2016 Catal. Chem.98 2210.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.060 ↗
23. Artyushkova K 2013 Chem. Catal.18 41
24. Gao M 2016 Nano Lett.5 321
25. Tan Z and Li H 2019 J. Mater. Chem. A7 160710.1039/C8TA09589B ↗
26. Sun M and Zhang G 2015 Sci. China Mater.58 68310.1007/s40843-015-0082-x ↗
27. Liu B and Wei L 2015 J. Cryst. Growth277 29310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.12.175 ↗
28. Sharghi H and Aboonajmi J 2018 Adv. Organomet. Chem.3 412410.1002/aoc.4124 ↗
29. Kizuka T and Miyazawa K 2017 J. Nanotechnol.3 613746
30. Chen Y 2019 Chem. Phys.152 894
31. Li D 2007 Nano Scale19 118
32. Jaifi F 2003 J. Chem. Phys.8 28
33. Broda M A 2011 J. Mol. Phys.67 209
34. Kupka T 2012 J. Mol. Phys.38 241
35. Kupka T and Kaminsky J 2012 Vibr. Spectrosc.63 43210.1016/j.vibspec.2012.09.005 ↗
36. Taylor M 2006 Chem. Spect.24 636