journal article·2009-02

Wavelength dependent laser-induced etching of Cr-O doped GaAs: Morphology studies by SEM and AFM

B. Joshi, S. S. Islam, H. S. Mavi, Vinita Kumari, T. Islam, A. K. Shukla, Harsh

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 32· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The laser induced etching of semi-insulating GaAs 〈100〉 is carried out to create porous structure under super- and sub-bandgap photon illumination (h v). The etching mechanism is different for these separate illuminations where defect states play the key role in making distinction between these two processes. Separate models are proposed for both the cases to explain the etching efficiency. It is observed that under sub-bandgap photon illumination the etching process starts vigorously through the mediation of intermediate defect states. The defect states initiate the pits formation and subsequently pore propagation occurs due to asymmetric electric field in the pore. Formation of GaAs nanostructures is observed using scanning electron (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Cha C, Han B Y and Weaver J H 1997 Surf. Sci. 381 L63610.1016/S0039-6028(97)00128-3 ↗
2. Han B Y, Cha C and Weaver J H 1998 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A16 49010.1116/1.581048 ↗
3. Mavi H S, Islam S S, Rath S, Chauhan B S and Shukla A K 2004a Mater. Chem. & Phys. 86 41410.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.04.010 ↗
4. Mavi H S, Shukla A K, Chauhan B S and Islam S S 2004b Mater. Sci. & Engg. B107 14810.1016/j.mseb.2003.10.101 ↗
5. Ross F M, Oskam G, Searson P C, Maculay J M and Liddle J A 1997 Philos. Mag. A75 52510.1080/01418619708205156 ↗
6. Simkiene A, Sabataityte T, Karpus V, Reza A, Babonas G J, Cechavicious B and Suchodolskis 2003 Mater. Sci. & Engg. C23 97710.1016/j.msec.2003.09.093 ↗
7. Svorick V and Rtybka V 1989 Chem. Phys. Lett. 164 54910.1016/0009-2614(89)85255-8 ↗
8. Svorick V, Rtybka V and Myslick V 1989 Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 39010.1016/0009-2614(89)87268-9 ↗
9. Svorick V, Rtybka V and Myslick V 1997 Chem. Phys. Lett. 144 54810.1016/0009-2614(88)87312-3 ↗
10. Syvenkyy Yu, Kotlyarchuk B, Zaginey A and Sahraoui B 2005 Opt. Commun. 256 34210.1016/j.optcom.2005.06.061 ↗
11. Veiko V P, Kieu Q K, Nikonorov N V, Shur V Ya, Luches A and Rho S 2005 Appl. Surf. Sci. 248 23110.1016/j.apsusc.2005.03.090 ↗
12. Yamamoto A and Yano S 1975 J. Electrochem. Soc.: Solid State Sci. & Technol. 122 26010.1149/1.2134192 ↗
13. Yi E H and Parker M A 2006 J. Electrochem. Soc. 153 49610.1149/1.2200297 ↗