journal article·2011-12

Fermi-edge singularity in photoluminescence spectra of modulation-doped AlGaAs/InGaAs/GaAs quantum wells

K. Gopalakrishna Naik, K. S. R. K. Rao, T. Srinivasan, R. Muralidharan

Bulletin of Materials Science· Volume 34· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The photoluminescence study of Fermi-edge singularity (FES) in modulation-doped pseudomorphic AlxGa1−xAs/InyGa1−yAs/GaAs quantum well (QW) heterostructures is presented. In the above QW structures the optical transitions between n = 1 and n = 2 electronic subband to the n = 1 heavy hole subband (E11 and E21 transitions, respectively) are observed with FES appearing as a lower energy shoulder to the E21 transition. The observed FES is attributed to the Fermi wave vector in the first electronic subband under the conditions of population of the second electronic subband. The FES appears at about 10 meV below E21 transition around 4·2 K. Initially it gets stronger with increasing temperature and becomes a distinct peak at about 20 K. Further increase in temperature quenches FES and reaches the base line at around 40 K.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Abbade M L F, Iikawa F, Brum J A, Troster Th., Bemussi A A, Pereira R G and Borghs G 1996 J. Appl. Phys. 80 192510.1063/1.362942 ↗
2. Brown S A, Young J F, Wasilewski Z and Coleridge P T 1997 Phys. Rev. B56 393710.1103/PhysRevB.56.3937 ↗
3. Chen W, Fritze M, Nurmikko A V, Ackley D, Colvard C and Lee H 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 243410.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2434 ↗
4. Chen W, Fritze M, Walecki W, Nurmikko A V, Ackley D, Hong J M and Chang L L 1992 Phys. Rev. B45 846410.1103/PhysRevB.45.8464 ↗
5. Fisher T A, Simmonds P E, Skolnick M S, Martin A D and Smith R S 1993 Phys. Rev. B48 1425310.1103/PhysRevB.48.14253 ↗
6. Hawrylak P 1990 Phys. Rev. B42 898610.1103/PhysRevB.42.8986 ↗
7. Hawrylak P 1991a Phys. Rev. B44 382110.1103/PhysRevB.44.3821 ↗
8. Hawrylak P 1991b Phys. Rev. B44 626210.1103/PhysRevB.44.6262 ↗
9. Hawrylak P 1992 Phys. Rev. B45 423710.1103/PhysRevB.45.4237 ↗
10. Kissel H et al 2000 Phys. Rev. B61 835910.1103/PhysRevB.61.8359 ↗
11. Kissel H et al 2002 Phys. Rev. B65 23532010.1103/PhysRevB.65.235320 ↗
12. Lyo S K and Jones E D 1988 Phys. Rev. B38 411310.1103/PhysRevB.38.4113 ↗
13. Mueller J F 1990 Phys. Rev. B42 189
14. Rodriguez F J and Tejedor C 1993 Phys. Rev. B47 150610.1103/PhysRevB.47.1506 ↗
15. Rodriguez F J and Tejedor C 1996 J. Phys: Condens. Matter 8 171310.1088/0953-8984/8/11/015 ↗
16. Ruckenstein A E and Schmitt-Rink S 1987 Phys. Rev. B35 755110.1103/PhysRevB.35.7551 ↗
17. Skolnick M S, Rorison J M, Nash K J, Mowbray D J, Tapster P R, Bass S J and Pitt A D 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 213010.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2130 ↗
18. Skolnick M S et al 1991 Phys. Rev. B43 735410.1103/PhysRevB.43.7354 ↗
19. Uenoyama T and Sham L J 1989 Phys. Rev. B39 1104410.1103/PhysRevB.39.11044 ↗
20. van der Meulen H P, Santa-Olalla I, Rubio J, Calleja J M, Friedland K J, Hey R and Ploog K 1999 Phys. Rev. B60 489710.1103/PhysRevB.60.4897 ↗
21. Xu S J, Chua S J, Tang X H and Zhang X H 1996 Phys. Rev. B54 17701