Characterization of amorphous hydrogenated carbon films deposited by MFPUMST at different ratios of mixed gases
Source abstract
Abstract
Amorphous hydrogenated carbon films (a-C:H) on p-type (100) silicon wafers were prepared with a middle frequency pulsed unbalanced magnetron sputtering technique (MFPUMST) at different ratios of methane–argon gases. The band characteristics, mechanical properties as well as refractive index were measured by Raman spectra, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), nano-indentation tests and spectroscopic ellipsometry. It is found that the sp 3 fraction increases with increasing Ar concentration in the range of 17–50%, and then decreases when Ar concentration exceeds 50%. The nano-indentation tests reveal that nano-hardness and elastic modulus of the films increase with increasing Ar concentration in the range of 17–50%, while decreases with increasing Ar concentration from 50% to 86%. The variations in the nano-hardness and the elastic modulus could be interpreted due to different sp 3 fractions in the prepared a-C:H films. The variation of refractive index with wavelength have the same tendency for the a-C:H films prepared at different Ar concentrations, they decrease with increasing wavelength from 600 to 1700 nm. For certain wavelengths within 600–1700 nm, refractive index has the highest value at the Ar concentration of 50%, and it is smaller at the Ar concentration of 86% than at 17%. The results given above indicate that ratio of mixed gases has a strong influence on bonding configuration and properties of a-C:H films during deposition. The related mechanism is discussed in this paper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Buijnsters J G, Camero M and Vazquez L 2006 Phys. Rev. B74 15541710.1103/PhysRevB.74.155417 ↗
2. Chowdhury S, Laugier M T and Rahman I Z 2004 Thin Solid Films 468 14910.1016/j.tsf.2004.04.006 ↗
3. Clin M, Durand-Drouhin O, Zeinert A and Picot J C 1999 Dia. Relat. Mater. 8 52710.1016/S0925-9635(98)00404-X ↗
4. Dai H Y, Wang L W, Jiang H and Huang N K 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 212210.1088/0256-307X/24/7/093 ↗
5. Dai H Y, Jiang H, Zhan C Y and Huang N K 2009 Surf. Interf. Anal. 41 56010.1002/sia.3060 ↗
6. Dey R M et al 2008 Curr. Appl. Phys. 8 610.1016/j.cap.2007.03.010 ↗
7. Huang Z H, Yang B, Fan X J and Fu D J 2006 Nucl. Sci. Technol. 17 13510.1016/S1001-8042(06)60026-2 ↗
8. Kumari K, Banerjee S, Chini T K and Ray N R 2009 Bull. Mater. Sci. 32 56310.1007/s12034-009-0085-x ↗
9. Lifshitz Y 1996 Dia. Relat. Mater. 5 38810.1016/0925-9635(95)00445-9 ↗
10. Liu Y H, Li J, Liu D P and Ma T C 2006 Surf. Coat. Technol. 200 581910.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.08.123 ↗
11. Myung H S, Park Y S, Lee J W, Hong B and Han J G 2005 Thin Solid Films 475 30310.1016/j.tsf.2004.07.017 ↗
12. Peng X L, Barber Z H and Clyne T W 2001 Surf. Coat. Technol. 138 2310.1016/S0257-8972(00)01139-7 ↗
13. Robertson J 2002 Mater. Sci. Eng. R37 12910.1016/S0927-796X(02)00005-0 ↗
14. Singh S B et al 2008 Bull. Mater. Sci. 31 81310.1007/s12034-008-0129-7 ↗
15. Wang K, Liang H, Martin J M and Mogne T L 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 05191810.1063/1.2767781 ↗
16. Zou Y S, Wang W, Song G H, Du H, Gong J, Huang R F and Wen L S 2004 Mater. Lett. 58 327110.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.017 ↗