Oxidation of ZnO thin films during pulsed laser deposition process
Source abstract
Abstract
Pulsed laser deposition of ZnO thin films, using KrF laser, is analysed. The films were deposited on (001) sapphire substrates at 400 °C, at two different oxygen pressures (0·3 and 0·4 mbar) and two different target–substrate distances (30 and 40 mm). It is observed that in order to obtain good quality in the photoluminescence of the films, associated with oxygen stoichiometry, it is needed to maximize the time during which the plasma remains in contact with the growing film (plasma residence time), which is achieved by selecting suitable combinations of oxygen pressures and target to substrate distances. It is also discussed that for the growth parameters used, the higher probability for ZnO films growth results from the oxidation of Zn deposited on the substrate and such process takes place during the time that the plasma is in contact with the substrate. Moreover, it is observed that maximizing the plasma residence time over the growing film reduces the rate of material deposition, favouring the surface diffusion of adatoms, which favours both Zn–O reaction and grain growth.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Carley A F, Davies P R and Roberts M W 2002 Catal. Lett. 80 2510.1023/A:1015314424172 ↗
2. Claeyssens F, Freeman C L, Allan N L, Sun Y, Ashfold M N R and Harding J H 2005 J. Mater. Chem. 15 13910.1039/B414111C ↗
3. Fisher E R, Elkind J L, Clemmer D E, Georgiadis R, Loh S K, Aristov N, Sunderlin L S and Armentrout P B 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 93 267610.1063/1.458906 ↗
4. Fukumura T, Jin Z, Ohtomo A, Koinuma H and Kawasaki M 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 336610.1063/1.125353 ↗
5. Im S, Jim B J and Yi S 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 455810.1063/1.373102 ↗
6. Itikawa Y, Ichimura A, Onda K, Sakimoto K and Takayanagi K 1989 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 18 2310.1063/1.555841 ↗
7. Li Y Z, Li X M, Yang C, Gao X D and He Y 2010 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43 28510110.1088/0022-3727/43/28/285101 ↗
8. Robin R, Cooper A R and Heuer A H 1973 J. Appl. Phys. 44 377010.1063/1.1662839 ↗
9. Shan F K, Liu G X, Lee W J, Lee G H, Kim I S and Shin B C 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 22191010.1063/1.1939078 ↗
10. Shim S, Kang H S, Kang J S, Kim J H and Lee S Y 2002 Appl. Surf. Sci. 186 47410.1016/S0169-4332(01)00746-2 ↗
11. Tang Z K, Wong G K L, Yu P, Kawasaki M, Ohtomo A, Koinuma H and Segawa Y 1998 Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 327010.1063/1.121620 ↗
12. Tobin G, McGlynn E, Henry M O, Mosnier J P, de Posada E and Lunney J G 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 07191910.1063/1.2174107 ↗
13. Tuck C D S, Whitehead M E and Smallman R E 1981 Corros. Sci. 21 33310.1016/0010-938X(81)90071-8 ↗
14. Vasco E, Zaldo C and Vazquez L 2001 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 66310.1088/0953-8984/13/28/102 ↗
15. Wang P R, Zhou Y L, Pan S H, He M, Chen Z H and Yang G Z 1999 Physica C 328 3710.1016/S0921-4534(99)00487-6 ↗
16. Wang R P, Muto H and Kusumori T 2003 Opt. Mater. 23 1510.1016/S0925-3467(03)00052-1 ↗
17. Wu X L, Siu G G, Fu C L and Ong H C 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 228510.1063/1.1361288 ↗
18. Xuan L Z, Pan S H, Chen Z H, Wang R P, Shi W S and Li C L 1998 Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 289610.1063/1.122622 ↗