Hyperpolarizability studies of some nonconjugated twin donor-acceptor molecules
Source abstract
Abstract
Extensive theoretical calculation on the effects of spacer length enhancement on the second-order NLO properties of twin donor acceptor molecules having two amide units bridged by the CH2 spacers was performed. The role of such aliphatic bridges on the Donor-Acceptor groups was computed by ZINDO/CV quantum chemical formalism. The odd-even effects were observed in twin donor acceptor systems (with two aliphatic units) linked by an alkyl spacer of varying length from n = 1 to n = 12. The system considered for the present study was N,N′-alkane-(1, n) diyl bis-4-hydroxy hexanamides. For an odd number of CH2 spacers, the β value was an order of magnitude higher than that for the even number of CH2 spacers. The origin for such oscillation is attributed to the similar oscillations in the dipole moment difference between the ground state and the dipole allowed state and to some extent on the variation in the oscillator strength.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Research · Chemical synthesis and pharmacological studies · Structural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Albert I D L and Ramasesha S 1990 J. Phys. Chem. 94 654010.1021/j100380a006 ↗
2. Bishop D M 1998 Adv. Chem. Phys. 104 110.1002/9780470141632.ch1 ↗
3. Datta A and Pati S K 2004 J. Phys. Chem. A108 32010.1021/jp030801z ↗
4. Datta A, Pati S K, Davis D and Sreekumar K 2005 J. Phys. Chem. A109 411210.1021/jp045449j ↗
5. Datta A and Pati S K 2005a J. Molecular Structure, Theochem. 756 9710.1016/j.theochem.2005.08.025 ↗
6. Datta A and Pati S K 2005b Chem. Eur. J. 11 496110.1002/chem.200401205 ↗
7. Datta A and Pati S K 2006 Chem. Soc. Rev. 35 130510.1039/b605478a ↗
8. Davis D, Sreekumar K and Pati S K 2005 Synth. Met. 155 38410.1016/j.synthmet.2005.09.019 ↗
9. Dewar M J S, Zoebisch E G, Healy E F and Stewart J J P 1985 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 390210.1021/ja00299a024 ↗
10. Elizabeth C V and Sreekumar K 2008 Proceedings SAMPADA-2008, Pune, India
11. Gaussian 03 Revision B.05 Gaussian Inc. Pittsburgh P A 2003
12. Guass J 2000 Modern methods and algorithms of quantum chemistry, Proceedings, 2nd edn 3 541
13. Gunter P 2000 Nonlinear Optical Effects Mater. 72 11
14. Kanis D R, Ratner M A and Marks T J 1994 Chem. Rev. 94 19510.1021/cr00025a007 ↗
15. Li Z, Yu G, Wu W, Liu Y, Ye C, Qin J and Li Z 2009 Macromolecules 42 386410.1021/ma900471t ↗
16. Ouder J L and Chemla D S 1977 J. Chem. Phys. 66 266410.1063/1.434213 ↗
17. Ouder J L and Zyss J 1982 Phys. Rev. A26 201610.1103/PhysRevA.26.2016 ↗
18. Pal S, Manna A K and Pati S K 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 20430110.1063/1.3020335 ↗
19. Park G, Jung W S and Ra C S 2004 Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 25 142710.5012/bkcs.2004.25.9.1427 ↗
20. Pati S K, Marks T J and Ratner M A 2001 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 728710.1021/ja0033281 ↗
21. Pati S K, Ramasesha S, Shuai Z and Bredas J L 1999 Phys. Rev. B59 1482710.1103/PhysRevB.59.14827 ↗
22. Ramasesha S and Albert I D L 1990 Phys. Rev. B42 858710.1103/PhysRevB.42.8587 ↗
23. Ramasesha S, Shuai Z and Bredas J L 1995 Chem. Phys. Lett. 245 22410.1016/0009-2614(95)00993-E ↗
24. Robert W and Boyd J 2009 Biomed. Opt. 14 2990210.1117/1.3115345 ↗
25. Simpson G J 2004 Chem. Phys. Chem. 5 130110.1002/cphc.200300959 ↗
26. Yongjun L, Ying L, Xianghe K, Min X and Chengbu L 2000 Theoret. Exp. Chem. 36 333