Oscillatory interlayer magnetic coupling and induced magnetism in Fe/Nb multilayers
Source abstract
Abstract
We present anab initiocalculation of interlayer magnetic coupling for Fe/Nb multilayers using the self-consistent full-potential linearized augmented-plane-wave (FLAPW) method. For this calculation, we have constructed supercells consisting ofbccFe and Nb multilayers in Fe/Nb/Fe sandwich geometry stacked along (001) direction. In the supercells two Fe layers are separated by Nb layers ranging from 1 to 11 layers. We have calculated the total energy of the system as a function of Nb spacer layer thickness. For each spacer layer thickness, we have done three calculations corresponding to para, ferro and antiferromagnetic ordering of Fe atoms. The interlayer magnetic coupling is obtained from the energy difference of the systems in which Fe layers are antiferromagnetically and ferromagnetically ordered. We find that the interlayer magnetic coupling oscillates with increasing Nb spacer thickness in agreement with the experimental results. The induced magnetic moment is also found to be oscillating with increasing Nb spacer layer thickness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Blaha P, Schwarz K and Luitz J 1999WIEN97, A full potential linearized augmented plane wave package for calculating crystal properties (ed.) Karlheinz Schwarz (Wien, Austria: Techn. Universitat) ISBN 3-9501031-0-4
2. Bruno P and Chappert C 1991Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 160210.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1602 ↗
3. Bruno P and Chappert C 1992Phys. Rev. B46 26110.1103/PhysRevB.46.261 ↗
4. Grunberg P, Schreiber R, Pang Y, Brodsky MB and Sowers H 1986Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 244210.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2442 ↗
5. Lang P, Nordstrom L, Zeller R and Dederichs P H 1993Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 192710.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1927 ↗
6. Mattson J E, Sowers C H, Berger A and Bader S D 1992Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 325210.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3252 ↗
7. Mirbt S, Eriksson O, Johansson B and Skriver H L 1995Phys. Rev. B52 1507010.1103/PhysRevB.52.15070 ↗
8. Niklasson A M N, Mirbt S, Skriver H L and Johansson B 1996Phys. Rev. B53 8509
9. Parkin S S P, More N and Roche K P 1990Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 230410.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2304 ↗
10. Purcell S Tet al 1991Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 90310.1103/PhysRevLett.67.903 ↗
11. Sticht J, Herman F and Kubler J 1991 inPhysics of transition metals (eds) P M Oppener and J Kubler (Singapore: World Scientific) Vol 1, pp 456–459
12. Stoeffler D, Ounadjela K, Sticht J and Gautier F 1994Phys. Rev. B49 29910.1103/PhysRevB.49.299 ↗
13. Unguris J, Celotta R J and Pierce D T 1991Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 14010.1103/PhysRevLett.67.140 ↗
14. Williams A R, Kubler J and Gelatt C D Jr 1979Phys. Rev. B19 609410.1103/PhysRevB.19.6094 ↗
15. Yoshihara A, Wang JT, Takanashi K, Himi K, Kawazoe Y, Fujimori H and Grunberg P 2001Phys. Rev. B63 100405(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.63.100405 ↗