Variations in first principles calculated defect energies in GaAs and their effect on practical predictions
Source abstract
Abstract
There is an abundant literature on calculations of formation and ionization energies of point defects in GaAs. Since most of these energies, especially the formation energies, are difficult to measure, the calculations are primary means of obtaining their values. However, based on the assumptions of the calculations, the reported values differ greatly among the various calculations. In this paper we discuss the sources of errors and their impact on practical predictions valuable in GaAs device fabrication. In particular, we have compared a large set of computed energies and selected the most appropriate values. Then, in the context of GaAs material quality, we investigated the impact of errors in calculation of formation energies on the performance of the GaAs substrate for device fabrication. We find that in spite of the errors inherent in ab initio calculations, it is possible to correctly predict the behaviour of GaAs substrate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Radiation Effects in Electronics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Bachelet G B, Hamann D R and Schluter M 1982Phys. Rev. B26 419910.1103/PhysRevB.26.4199 ↗
2. Baraff G A and Schluter M 1985Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 132710.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1327 ↗
3. Cheong B-H and Chang K J 1994Phys. Rev. B49 1743610.1103/PhysRevB.49.17436 ↗
4. Deepak and Lakshminarayana N 2001Bull. Mater. Sci. 24 22510.1007/BF02710106 ↗
5. Deepak and Priyadarshi A 2002Mater. Sci. Eng. B94 21
6. Holmes D E, Chen R T, Elliot K R, Kirkpatrick C G and Yu P W 1982IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech. MTT-30 94910.1109/TMTT.1982.1131182 ↗
7. Jansen R W and Sankey O F 1989Phys. Rev. B39 319210.1103/PhysRevB.39.3192 ↗
8. Makov G and Payne M C 1995Phys. Rev. B51 401410.1103/PhysRevB.51.4014 ↗
9. Northrup J E and Zhang S B 1993Phys. Rev. B47 679110.1103/PhysRevB.47.6791 ↗
10. Poykko S, Puska M J and Nieminen R M 1996Phys. Rev. B53 3813
11. Schultz P A 2000Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 194210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1942 ↗
12. Seong H and Lewis L J 1995Phys. Rev. B52 567510.1103/PhysRevB.52.5675 ↗