Observation of the nano-effect on the SHG in moderately Cu-doped CdI2 thin nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanocrystals take into account the nano-sized quantum-confined effect, where k-space bulk-like dispersion disappears and discrete excitonic-like nanolevels occur within the forbidden energy gap of the material processes. Nanocrystals of cadmium iodide both un-doped and doped with copper, synthesized and grown by the standard Bridgman method, were analysed by scanning electron microscopy for the investigation of the nano-confined effect on the optical nonlinearity. The second harmonic generation (SHG) of the crystals was measured and studied. The second-order optical susceptibilities in dependences of the size of the nanocrystals and of their copper contents within low levels were calculated. The results showed a clear increase in the SHG with the decrease in the thickness of the nanocrystals. The observed size dependence, however, demonstrates the nano-confined effect or nano-effect on the SHG, where the quantum confinement dominates the material’s optical properties. A significant change in the second-order optical response with copper content of the nanocrystals was also observed. The observed results are discussed by exploring the photo-induced electron–phonon anharmonic interaction for the noncentrosymmetry of the nanocrystallite’s process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Nonlinear Optical Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Haug H (ed.) 1988 Optical nonlinearities and instabilities in semiconductors (New York: Academic Press)
2. Born W E (ed.) 1993 Ultrashort processes in condensed matter (New York: Plenum Press)10.1007/978-1-4615-2954-5 ↗
3. Bordas J, Robertson J and Jakobsson A 1978 J. Phys. C 11 260710.1088/0022-3719/11/12/021 ↗
4. Robertson J 1979 J. Phys. C 12 475310.1088/0022-3719/12/22/017 ↗
5. Dorgii Ya O, Kityk I V, Aleksandrov Yu M, Kolobanov V N, Machov V N and Michailin V V 1985 J. Appl. Spectrosc 43 116810.1007/BF00662338 ↗
6. Catalano I M, Cingolani A, Ferrara R and Lepore M 1985 Helv. Phys. Acta 58 329
7. Miah M I 2002 Opt. Mater. 20 27910.1016/S0925-3467(02)00071-X ↗
8. Miah M I 2004 Opt. Mater. 25 35310.1016/j.optmat.2003.08.007 ↗
9. Miah M I 2009 Phys. Lett. A 374 7510.1016/j.physleta.2009.10.019 ↗
10. Miah M I 2010 Mater. Chem. Phys. 119 40210.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.09.013 ↗
11. Kityk I V, Pyroha S A, Mydlarz T, Kasperczyk J and Czerwinski M 1998 Ferroelectrics 205 10710.1080/00150199808228391 ↗
12. Bondar V 2000 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 70 25810.1016/S0921-5107(99)00386-4 ↗
13. Miah M I 2005 In The first conference on advances in optical materials, October 12–15, 2005 (Tucson, Arizona, USA)
14. Herest D and Voolless F 2004 Opt. Lasers Eng. 41 8510.1016/S0143-8166(03)00070-8 ↗
15. Miah M I and Kasperczyk J 2009 Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 053117; Miah M I 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 519910.1016/j.optcom.2011.07.004 ↗
16. Pyroha S A, Metry S, Olekseyuk I D and Kityk I V 2000 Funct. Mater. 7 209
17. Devis C C 1985 Laser and electro-optics, fundamentals and engineering (New York: Cambridge University Press)
18. Arun P 2007 Phys. Lett. A 364 15710.1016/j.physleta.2006.11.069 ↗
19. Salimullah M, Shukla P K, Ghosh S K, Nitta H and Hayashi Y 2003 J. Phys. D 36 95810.1088/0022-3727/36/8/303 ↗
20. McCanny J V, Williams R H, Murray R B and Kemeny P C 1977 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 10 425510.1088/0022-3719/10/21/014 ↗
21. Miah M I J. Appl. Phys. 104 06431310.1063/1.2978224 ↗
22. Krongman K C, Druffel T and Sunkara M K 2005 Nanotechnology 16 5338
23. Karbovnyk I, Lesivtsiv V, Bolesta I, Velgosh S, Rovetsky I, Pankratov V, Balasubramanian C and Popov A I 2013 Physica B 413 1210.1016/j.physb.2012.10.044 ↗